Using Response Times to Infer Others’ Private Information: An Application to Information Cascades

References

• Achtziger A, Alós-Ferrer C (2013) Fast or rational? A response-times study of Bayesian updating. Management Sci. 60(4):923–938. 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1793Link, Google Scholar
• Agranov M, Ortoleva P (2017) Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. J. Political Econom. 12(1):40–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agranov M, Caplin A, Tergiman C (2015) Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(2):146–157. 10.1007/s40881-015-0003-5Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alós-Ferrer C, Fehr E, Netzer N (2018) Time will tell: Recovering preferences when choices are noisy. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7333, CESifo Group, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Alós-Ferrer C, Granić Ð-G, Kern J, Wagner AK (2016) Preference reversals: Time and again. J. Risk Uncertainity 52(1):65–97. 10.1007/s11166-016-9233-zCrossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, Holt CA (1997) Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(5):847–862.Google Scholar
• Avery C, Zemsky P (1998) Multidimensional uncertainty and herd behavior in financial markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 724–748.Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Google Scholar
• Bartels L (1988) Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Battaglini M, Morton R, Palfrey T (2007) Efficiency, equity, and timing of voting mechanisms. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 101(3):409–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker WJ, Connolly T, Slaughter JE (2010) The effect of job offer timing on offer acceptance, performance, and turnover. Personnel Psych. 63(1):223–241. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01167.xCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Google Scholar
• Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen JD (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psych. Rev. 113(4):700–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bossaerts P, Frydman C, Ledyard J (2014) The speed of information revelation and eventual price quality in markets with insiders: Comparing two theories. Rev. Finance 18(1):1–22. 10.1093/rof/rfs049Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psych. Rev. 100(3):432–459. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callander S (2007) Bandwagons and momentum in sequential voting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):653–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weigelt K (1991) Information mirages in experimental asset markets. J. Bus. 64(4):463–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chabris CF, Morris CL, Taubinsky D, Laibson D, Schuldt JP (2009) The allocation of time in decision-making. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):628–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamley C, Gale D (1994) Information revelation and strategic delay in a model of investment. Econometrica 1065–1085.Google Scholar
• Cipriani M, Guarino A (2005) Herd behavior in a laboratory financial market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1427–1443.Google Scholar
• Clithero JA (2018) Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 148(April):344–375. 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.007Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Karol D, Noel H, Zaller J (2009) The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Coricelli G, Nagel R (2009) Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(23):9163–9168. 10.1073/pnas.0807721106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007) Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica 75(6):1721–1770. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00810.xCrossref, Google Scholar
• Dekel E, Piccione M (2000) Sequential voting procedures in symmetric binary elections. J. Political Econom. 108(1):34–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Martino B, O’Doherty JP, Ray D, Bossaerts P, Camerer C (2013) In the mind of the market: Theory of mind biases value computation during financial bubbles. Neuron 79(6):1222–1231. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickhaut J, Rustichini A, Smith V (2009) A neuroeconomic theory of the decision process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(52):22145–22150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drehmann M, Oechssler J, Roider A (2005) Herding and contrarian behavior in financial markets: An internet experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1403–1426.Google Scholar
• Echenique F, Saito K (2017) Response time and utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 139(July):49–59. 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.008Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Rubinstein A (2014) A model of boundedly rational ‘neuro’ agents. Econom. Theory 57(3):515–528. 10.1007/s00199-014-0834-yCrossref, Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Rabin M (2010) Naïve herding in rich-information settings. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 2(4):221–243. 10.1257/mic.2.4.221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Rabin M (2014) Extensive imitation is irrational and harmful. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1861–1898. 10.1093/qje/qju021Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Rabin M, Weizsacker G (2015) An experiment on social mislearning. Preprint, submitted December 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2704746.Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Nave G (2017) Extrapolative beliefs in perceptual and economic decisions: Evidence of a common mechanism. Management Sci. 63(7):2340–2352. 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2453Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Strack P, Strzalecki T (2018) Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(12):3651–3684. 10.1257/aer.20150742Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giglio S, Shue K (2014) No news is news: Do markets underreact to nothing? Rev. Financial Stud. 27(12):3389–3440. 10.1093/rfs/hhu052Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse VL (2017) Using response times to measure strategic complexity and the value of thinking in games. Preprint, submitted January 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2902411.Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Palfrey TR, Rogers BW, McKelvey RD (2007) Self-correcting information cascades. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):733–762. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00438.xCrossref, Google Scholar
• Guarino A, Harmgart H, Huck S (2011) Aggregate information cascades. Games Econom. Behav. 73(1):167–185.Google Scholar
• Gul F, Lundholm R (1995) Endogenous timing and the clustering of agents’ decisions. J. Political Econom. 103(5):1039–1066.Google Scholar
• Herrera H, Hörner J (2013) Biased social learning. Games Econom. Behav. 80:131–146.Google Scholar
• Karing A (2021) Social signaling and childhood immunization: A field experiment in Sierra Leone. Working paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Krajbich I (2019) Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times. Judgment Decision Making 14(4):381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Krajbich I (2020) Decision times reveal private information in strategic settings: Evidence from bargaining experiments. Preprint, submitted September 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3023640.Google Scholar
• Kool W, Botvinick M (2014) A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(1):131–141. 10.1037/a0031048Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A (2010) Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience 13(10):1292–1298. 10.1038/nn.2635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Oud B, Fehr E (2014) Benefits of neuroeconomic modeling: New policy interventions and predictors of preference.† Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):501–506. 10.1257/aer.104.5.501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kübler D, Weizsäcker G (2004) Limited depth of reasoning and failure of cascade formation in the laboratory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):425–441. 10.1111/0034-6527.00290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kübler D, Weizsäcker G (2005) Are longer cascades more stable? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2–3):330–339. 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee IH (1993) On the convergence of informational cascades. J. Econom. Theory 61(2):395–411. 10.1006/jeth.1993.1074Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayew WJ, Venkatachalam M (2012) The power of voice: Managerial affective states and future firm performance. J. Finance 67(1):1–43. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01705.xCrossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1995) Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):6–38. 10.1006/game.1995.1023Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moffatt PG (2005) Stochastic choice and the allocation of cognitive effort. Experiment. Econom. 8(4):369–388. 10.1007/s10683-005-5375-6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mormann MM, Malmaud J, Huth A, Koch C, Rangel A (2010) The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judgment Decision Making 5(6):437–449.Google Scholar
• Mosteller F, Nogee P (1951) An experimental measurement of utility. J. Political Econom. 59(5):371–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paravisini D, Schoar A (2013) The incentive effect of scores: Randomized evidence from credit committees. NBER Working Paper No. 19303, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Penczynski S (2017) The nature of social learning: Experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 94:148–165.Google Scholar
• Philiastides MG, Ratcliff R (2013) Influence of branding on preference-based decision making. Psych. Sci. 24(7):1208–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanía R, Krajbich I, Grueschow M, Ruff CC (2014) Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making. Neuron 82(3):709–720. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.014Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez CA, Turner BM, McClure SM (2014) Intertemporal choice as discounted value accumulation. PLoS One 9(2):e90138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2016) A typology of players: Between instinctive and contemplative. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):859–890. 10.1093/qje/qjw008Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Trevino I (2020) Is response time predictive of choice? An experimental study of threshold strategies. Experiment. Econom., ePub ahead of print March 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09651-1.Google Scholar
• Spiliopoulos L, Ortmann A (2017) The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom. 21(2018):383–433.Google Scholar
• Stahl II DO, Wilson PW (1994) Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25(3):309–327. 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turocy TL, Cason TN (2015) Bidding in first-price and second-price interdependent-values auctions: A laboratory experiment. Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science Working Paper No. 15-23, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
• Van de Calseyde PP, Keren G, Zeelenberg M (2014) Decision time as information in judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):113–122.Google Scholar
• Wald A (1945) Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann. Math. Statist. 16(2):117–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb R (2018) The (neural) dynamics of stochastic choice. Management Sci. 65(1):230–255. 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2931Link, Google Scholar
• Weizsäcker G (2010) Do we follow others when we should? A simple test of rational expectations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2340–2360. 10.1257/aer.100.5.2340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I (1992) Sequential sales, learning, and cascades. J. Finance 47(2):695–732. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04406.xCrossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I (2000) Herding among security analysts. J. Financial Econom. 58(3):369–396. 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00076-3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox NT (1993) Lottery choice: Incentives, complexity and decision time. Econom. J. 103(421):1397–1417. 10.2307/2234473Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodford M (2014) Stochastic choice: An optimizing neuroeconomic model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):495–500. 10.1257/aer.104.5.495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (1997) Strategic delay and the onset of investment cascades. RAND J. Econom. 28(1):188–205.Crossref, Google Scholar