Crowdsourcing Ideas Using Product Prototypes: The Joint Effect of Prototype Enhancement and the Product Design Goal on Idea Novelty

References

• Althuizen N, Reichel A (2016) The effects of IT-enabled cognitive stimulation tools on creative problem solving: A dual pathway to creativity. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):11–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Althuizen N, Wierenga B (2014) Supporting creative problem solving with a case-based reasoning system. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):309–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B (2013) Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Sci. 59(1):226–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Besemer SP, O’Quin K (1986) Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. J. Creative Behav. 20(2):115–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burroughs JE, Mick DG (2004) Exploring antecedents and consequences of consumer creativity in a problem-solving context. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):402–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi I, Koo M, Choi JA (2007) Individual differences in analytic vs. holistic thinking. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(5):691–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psych. Rev. 82(6):407–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Moreau CP (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. 39(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean DL, Hender JM, Rodgers TL, Santanen EL (2006) Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 7(10):646–698.Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):739–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis A, Meurs T (2006) Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness Cognition 15(1):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eysenck HJ (1942) The experimental study of the good gestalt: A new approach. Psych. Rev. 49(4):344–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke RA (1995) Creative realism. Smith SM, Ward TB, Finke RA, eds. The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press Cambridge, MA), 27–52.Google Scholar
• Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs C, Prandelli E, Schreier M, Dahl DW (2013) All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. J. Marketing 77(5):75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Heath TB, McCarthy MS, Mothersbaugh DL (1994) Spokesperson fame and vividness effects in the context of issue-relevant thinking: The moderating role of competitive setting. J. Consumer Res. 20(4):520–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hildebrand C, Häubl G, Herrmann A (2014) Product customization via starting solutions. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollins B, Pugh S (1990) Successful Product Design (Butterworths, London).Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product idea under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Design Stud. 12(1):3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koffka K (1935) Principles of Gestalt Theory (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2014) The importance of the raw idea in innovation: Testing the sow’s ear hypothesis. J. Marketing Res. 51(1):14–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson B (1983) How Designers Think (East-View Editions, Westfield, NJ).Google Scholar
• Marsh RL, Landau JD, Hicks JL (1996) How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory Cognition 24(5):669–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masuda T, Nisbett RE (2001) Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(5):922–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovan S, Goldenberg J, Chattopadhyay A (2011) The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28(2):109–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monga AB, John DR (2007) Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: The influence of analytic vs. holistic thinking. J. Consumer Res. 33(4):529–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monga AB, John DR (2008) When does negative publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytical vs. holistic thinking. J. Consumer Psych. 18(4):320–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Herd KB (2010) To each his own? How comparisons with others influence consumers’ evaluations of their self-designed products. J. Consumer Res. 36(5):806–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muth C, Carbon C (2013) The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica 144(1):25–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psych. 9(3):353–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):186–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2002) Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(6):535–544.Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, De Dreu CKW, Rietzschel EF, Baas M (2010) The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 21(1):34–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Noren-Zayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psych. Rev. 108(2):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishikawa H, Schreier M, Ogawa S (2013) User-generated vs. designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(2):160–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1727–1746.Link, Google Scholar
• Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Product Innovation Management 29(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2007) Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(6):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin E (1915) Synsoplevede Figurer (Gyldendalske Boghandel, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
• Sacchi S, Riva P, Aceto A (2016) Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 65(July):68–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreier M, Fuchs C, Dahl DW (2012) The innovation effect of user design: Exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. J. Marketing 76(5):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sellier A, Dahl DW (2011) Focus! Creative success is enjoyed through restricted choice. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):996–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull. 86(2):420–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Netzer O (2017) Idea generation, creativity, and prototypicality. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward TB (1994) Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psych. 27(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weston NJ, Perfect TJ, Schooler JW, Dennis I (2008) Navon processing and verbalisation: A holistic/featural distinction. Eur. J. Cognitive Psych. 20(3):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar