Valuation Effects of Norway’s Board Gender-Quota Law Revisited

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:1291–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Akyol AC, Verwijmeren P (2018) Director skill sets. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):641–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar A (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berner E, Mjøs A, Olving M (2013) Norwegian corporate accounts. Working Paper 42/13, Center for Applied Research at NHH, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Bernile G, Bhagwat V, Yonker S (2018) Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 127(3):588–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
• Betton S, Eckbo BE, Thorburn KS (2008) Corporate takeovers. Eckbo BE, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 291–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beuselinck C, Cao L, Deloof M, Xia X (2017) The value of government ownership during the global financial crisis. J. Corporate Finance 42:481–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bøhren Ø, Staubo S (2014) Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. J. Corporate Finance 28:152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1980) Measuring security price performance. J. Financial Econom. 8(3):205–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carhart MM (1997) On the persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2007) Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of the 2002 governance rules. J. Finance 62(4):1789–1825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Bodt E, Eckbo BE, Roll R (2020) Corporate rivalry and stock return comovement. Working paper, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Matsusaka J, Ozbas O (2010) When are outside directors effective? J. Financial Econom. 96(2):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE (2014) Corporate takeovers and economic efficiency. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 6:51–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz RM (2010) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97:12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 43:3–56.Google Scholar
• Fich E (2005) Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. J. Business 78(5):1943–1971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French KR (1980) Stock returns and the weekend effect. J. Financial Econom. 8(1):55–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Ishii JL, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gormley TA, Matsa DA (2014) Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(2):617–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene D, Intintoli VJ, Kahle KM (2020) Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill no. 826. J. Corporate Finance 60:101526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Shivdasani A, Simintzi E (2018) Mandating women on boards: Evidence from the United States. Research paper 18–34, Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
• Kang S, Kim EH, Lu Y (2018) Does independent directors’ CEO experience matter? Rev. Finance 22(3):905–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):267–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolari JW, Pynnönen S (2010) Event-study testing with cross-sectional correlation of abnormal stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(11):3998–4025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Warner JB (2007) Econometrics of event studies. Eckbo BE, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuzmina O, Melentyeva V (2020) Gender diversity in corporate boards: Evidence from quota-implied discontinuities. Discussion paper DP14942, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Mobbs S (2011) Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. J. Finance 66(3):823–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller A (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller AR (2018) Women and leadership. Averett SL, Argys LM, Hoffman SD, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy (Oxford University Press, New York), 539–560.Google Scholar
• Næs R, Skjeltorp J, Ødegaard BA (2008) Hvilke faktorer driver kursutviklingen på Oslo Børs? Norsk Økonomisk Tidskrift 122:36–81.Google Scholar
• Scholes M, Williams J (1977) Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. J. Financial Econom. 5(3):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwert GW (1981) Using financial data to measure the effect of regulation. J. Law Econom. 24(1):121–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sefcik SE, Thompson R (1986) An approach to statistical inference in cross-sectional models with security abnormal returns as dependent variable. J. Account. Res. 24:316–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson B (2010) Beyond the classroom: Using Title IX to measure the return to high school sports. Rev. Econ. Stat. 92:284–301.Crossref, Google Scholar