More Women in Tech? Evidence from a Field Experiment Addressing Social Identity

References

• Adams RB, Barber BM, Odean T (2018) STEM parents and women in finance. Financial Anal. J. 74(2):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera N, Lee SS (2016) Do-gooders and go-getters: Career incentives, selection, and performance in public service delivery. Working paper, International Growth Centre, London.Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Ferrer R (2017) Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1306–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Sci. 335(6068):583–586.Google Scholar
• Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J (2019) Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 134(2):647–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4, part B (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1545–1592.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Kamenica E, Pan J (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. Quart. J. Econom. 130(2):571–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanton H, Jaccard J, Klick J, Mellers B, Mitchell G, Tetlock PE (2009) Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):567–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ (1987) Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(4):531–553.Google Scholar
• Breda T, Grenet J, Monnet M, Van Effenterre C (2018) Can female role models reduce the gender gap in science? Evidence from classroom interventions in French high schools. PSE Working Papers No. 2018-06, Paris School of Economics, Paris.Google Scholar
• Carlana M (2019) Implicit stereotypes: Evidence from teachers’ gender bias. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1163–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Page ME, West JE (2010) Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1101–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Handron C, Hudson L (2013) The stereotypical computer scientist: gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69(1-2):58–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Siy JO, Vichayapai M, Drury BJ, Kim S (2011) Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 2(6):656–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó E, Finan F, Rossi MA (2013) Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):1169–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennehy TC, Dasgupta N (2017) Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(23):5964–5969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Huffman DB, Sunde U (2016) The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9674, IZA, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Friedrich C (2011) Gender sorting at the application interface. Indust. Relations 50(4):591–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Lourdes Sosa M (2005) Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):859–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory J, Leibbrandt A, List J (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gee LK (2019) The more you know: Information effects on job application rates in a large field experiment. Management Sci. 65(5):2077–2094.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Wilmuth CA, Brooks AW (2015) Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(40):12354–12359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good C, Aronson J, Inzlicht M (2003) Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. J. Appl. Developmental Psych. 24(6):645–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(6):1464–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR (2009) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test. III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh C-T, Hurst E, Jones CI, Klenow PJ (2019) The allocation of talent and U.S. economic growth. Econometrica 87(5):1439–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2017) Stereotypes are only a threat when beliefs are reinforced: On the sensitivity of gender differences in performance under competition to information provision. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 135(C):99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawakami K, Amodio DM, Hugenberg K (2017) Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 55:1–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinescu I, Wolthoff R (2016) Opening the black box of the matching function: The power of words. NBER Working Paper No. 22508, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Miller DI, Eagly AH, Linn MC (2015) Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. J. Ed. Psych. 107(3):631–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niessen-Ruenzi A, Ruenzi S (2019) Sex matters: Gender bias in the mutual fund industry. Management Sci. 65(7):3001–3025.Link, Google Scholar
• Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE (2013) Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 105(2):171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Green DP (2009) Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Rev. Psych. 60(1):339–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter C, Serra D (2020) Gender differences in the choice of major: The importance of female role models. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(3):226–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Econom. Papers 3(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):797–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Sci. 330(6004):686–688.Google Scholar