Consistency as a Means to Comparability: Theory and Evidence

References

• Arya A, Glover J, Mittendorf B (2006) Hierarchical reporting, aggregation, and information cascades. Management Decision Econom. 27:355–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh H, Pincus M (2001) Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. J. Accounting Res. 39:417–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae KH, Tan H, Welker M (2008) International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. Accounting Rev. 83:593–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball R, Kothari SP, Robin A (2000) The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 29:1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball R, Robin A, Wu JS (2003) Incentives vs. standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. J. Accounting Econom. 36:235–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Landsman WR, Lang M, Williams C (2012) Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? J. Accounting Econom. 54:68–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Marinovic I (2016) A theory of hard and soft information. Accounting Rev. 91:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer A (2013) Conservatism and aggregation: The effect on cost of equity capital and the efficiency of debt contracts. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81:637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black DE, Christensen TE, Ciesielski JT, Whipple BC (2018) Non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice. J. Bus. Finance Account. 45:259–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black DE, Christensen TE, Ciesielski JT, Whipple BC (2020) Non-GAAP earnings: A consistency and comparability Crisis? Working Paper, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MT, Miller GS (2008) Will harmonizing accounting standards really harmonize accounting? Evidence from non-US firms adopting US GAAP. J. Accounting Audit Finance 23:233–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MT, Bushee BJ, Miller GS (2004) Accounting choice, home bias, and US investment in non-US firms. J. Accounting Res. 42:795–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caskey J, Hughes JS (2011) Assessing the impact of alternative fair value measures on the efficiency of project selection and continuation. Accounting Rev. 87:483–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CW, Collins DW, Kravet TD, Mergenthaler R (2018) Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Contemp. Accounting Res. 35:164–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Lewis TR, Schipper K, Zhang Y (2017) Uniform vs. discretionary regimes in reporting information with unverifiable precision and a coordination role. J. Accounting Res. 55:153–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Franco G, Kothari SP, Verdi RS (2011) The benefits of financial statement comparability. J. Accounting Econom. 49:895–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM (1994) Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. J. Accounting Econom. 18:3–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM, Kothari SP, Watts RL (1998) The relation between earnings and cash flows. J. Accounting Econom. 25:133–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond M, Hu X, Hung M, Li S (2011) The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. J. Accounting Econom. 51:240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye RA, Sridhar SS (2004) Reliability-relevance trade-offs and the efficiency of aggregation. J. Accounting Res. 42:51–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye RA, Sridhar SS (2008) A positive theory of flexibility in accounting standards. J. Accounting Econom. 46:312–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye RA, Verrecchia RE (1995) Discretion vs. uniformity: Choices among GAAP. Accounting Rev. 70:389–415.Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Zhang XJ (2012) Accounting conservatism, aggregation, and information quality. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29:38–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang VW, Maffett M, Zhang B (2015) Foreign institutional ownership and the global convergence of financial reporting practices. J. Accounting Res. 53:593–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Li Y, Xin B, Zhang W (2016) Financial statement comparability and debt contracting: Evidence from the syndicated loan market. Accounting Horizons 30:277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FASB (1980) Statement of financial accounting concepts No. 2: Qualitative characteristics of accounting information.Google Scholar
• FASB (2010) Statement of financial accounting concepts No. 8: Conceptual framework for financial reporting.Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1915) Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10:507–521.Google Scholar
• Jiang JX, Wang IY, Wangerin D (2018) How does the FASB make decisions? Agenda setting, individual board members, and fair value accounting. Accounting Organ. Soc. 71:30–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JB, Li L, Lu L, Yu Y (2016) Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk. J. Accounting Econom. 61:294–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A (2018) Discussion of “financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions.”. Contemporary Accounting Res. 35:203–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang M, Stice-Lawrence L (2015) Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. J. Accounting Econom. 60:110–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorek KS, Willinger GL (1996) A multivariate time-series prediction model for cash-flow data. Accounting Rev. 71:81–102.Google Scholar
• Lorek KS, Willinger GL (2011) Multi-step-ahead quarterly cash-flow prediction models. Accounting Horizons 25:71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorek KS, Schaefer TF, Willinger GL (1993) Time-series properties and predictive ability of funds flow variables. Accounting Rev. 68:151–163.Google Scholar
• Rogers JL, Skinner DJ, Van Buskirk A (2009) Earnings guidance and market uncertainty. J. Accounting Econom. 48:90–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104:655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunder S (2010) Adverse effects of uniform written reporting standards on accounting practice, education, and research. J. Accounting Public Policy 29:99–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SB (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J. Finance Econom. 99:1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C (2014) Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. J. Accounting Res. 52:955–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C (2015) Financial statements comparability: Definition and implication for equity valuation. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Young D, Guenther D (2003) Financial reporting environments and international capital mobility. J. Accounting Res. 41:553–579.Crossref, Google Scholar