Chasing Diamonds and Crowns: Consumer Limited Attention and Seller Response

References

• Anderson M, Magruder J (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. (London) 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2003) Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens GW (2017) The econometrics of randomized experiments. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (Elsevier, New York), 73–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2003) The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from ebay auctions. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):329–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2004) Economic insights from Internet auctions. J. Econom. Literature 42(2):457–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Isaac H, Tadelis S (2008) Seller reputation. Foundations Trends Microeconom. 4(4):273–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P, Chen Y, Godes D (2008) Buyer-initiated vs. seller-initiated information revelation. Management Sci. 54(6):1104–1114.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2015) Competition for attention. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):481–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J, Hossain T, Morgan J (2010) Shrouded attributes and information suppression: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):859–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2009) The Economics of Reputation and Trust: A Primer (Work in Progress) (New York University, New York).Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2012) Reputation on the Internet. Peitz M, Waldfogel J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 343–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Hortacsu A (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from ebay. J. Industrial Econom. 58(1):54–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cui TH (2013) The benefit of uniform price for branded variants. Marketing Sci. 32(1):36–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Iyer G, Pazgal A (2010) Limited memory, categorization, and competition. Marketing Sci. 29(4):650–670.Link, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehaene S (1992) Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44(1-2):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehaene S (2011) The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics (OUP USA).Google Scholar
• Dehaene S, Spelke E, Pinel P, Stanescu R, Tsivkin S (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Sci. 284(5416):970–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2018) Auctions vs. posted prices in online markets. J. Political Econom. 126(1):178–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Kuchler T, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2015) Assessing sale strategies in online markets using matched listings. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(2):215–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Fisman R, McManus B (2012) Charity as a substitute for reputation: Evidence from an online marketplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(4):1441–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison SF, Snyder C, Zhang H (2018) Costs of managerial attention and activity as a source of sticky prices: Structural estimates from an online market. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Ju J, Xiao M (2016) Reputation premium and reputation management: Evidence from the largest e-commerce platform in china. Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 46:63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A (2009) E-ztax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):969–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Keil FC (2018) The binary bias: A systematic distortion in the integration of information. Psych. Sci. 29(11):1846–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Ho T-H, Amaldoss W, Brown AL, Chen Y, Cui TH, Galasso A, et al. (2012) Behavioral models of managerial decision-making. Marketing Lett. 23(2):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorodnichenko Y, Talavera O (2017) Price setting in online markets: Basic facts, international comparisons, and cross-border integration. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(1):249–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubb MD (2015) Behavioral consumers in industrial organization: An overview. Rev. Industrial Organ. 47(3):247–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2015) Inequity aversion and fair selling. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. J. Econometrics 93(2):345–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen BE (2000) Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica 68(3):575–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hörner J (2002) Reputation and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):644–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Morgan J (2006) …plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non)equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy 6:63–91.Google Scholar
• Isaac MS, Schindler RM (2014) The top-ten effect: Consumers’ subjective categorization of ranked lists. J. Consumer Res. 40(6):1181–1202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Kato A (2006) Price, quality, and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):983–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2013) On the near impossibility of measuring the returns to advertising.Google Scholar
• Li KJ, Jain S (2015) Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Management Sci. 62(9):2705–2721.Link, Google Scholar
• Livingston JA (2005) How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(3):453–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Lee YH (2011) The bidder’s curse. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):749–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M (2016) Competing for attention : Is the showiest also the best? Econom. J. (London) 128(609):827–844.Google Scholar
• Overgaard PB (1993) Price as a signal of quality: A discussion of equilibrium concepts in signalling games. Eur. J. Political Econom. 9(4):483–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pandelaere M, Briers B, Lembregts C (2011) How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. J. Consumer Res. 38(2):308–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pei Z (2011) Regression discontinuity design with measurement error in the assignment variable. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Princeton, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Pope DG, et al. (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from america’s best hospitals. J. Health Econom. 28(6):1154–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saeedi M (2019) Reputation and adverse selection: Theory and evidence from ebay. RAND J. Econom. 50(4):822–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santana S, Thomas M, Morwitz VG (2020) The role of numbers in the customer journey. J. Retailing 96(1):138–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schindler RM, Kibarian TM (1996) Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. J. Retailing 72(2):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schindler RM, Kirby PN (1997) Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):192–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard RN, Kilpatric DW, Cunningham JP (1975) The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psych. 7(1):82–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Medin DL (1981) Categories and Concepts, vol. 9 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stango V, Zinman J (2014) Limited and varying consumer attention: Evidence from shocks to the salience of bank overdraft fees. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(4):990–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S (2016) Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Rev. Econom. 321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Morwitz V (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanhuele M, Laurent G, Dreze X (2006) Consumers’ immediate memory for prices. J. Consumer Res. 33(2):163–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Q (2015) Fixed-effect panel threshold model using stata. Stata J. 15(1):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2013) The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Sci. 32(6):860–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Dukes AJ (2017) Prominent attributes under limited attention. Marketing Sci. 36(5):683–698.Link, Google Scholar