Quality Regulation on Two-Sided Platforms: Exclusion, Subsidization, and First-Party Applications

References

• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Kemerer CF (1989) Scale economies in new software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 15(10):1199–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2019) Managing competition on a two‐sided platform. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A 2009. Platform rules: multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elger Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2015) Investment Incentives in Open-Source and Proprietary Two-Sided Platforms. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):306–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu D (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Annunzio A (2017) Vertical integration in the TV market: Exclusive provision and program quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 53(July):114–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):92–101.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2009) Opening platforms: how, when and why? Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elger Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 131–162.Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):28–35.Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009a) Quantity vs. quality and exclusion by two-sided platforms. Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 09-094, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009b) Two-sided platforms: product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(2):71–80.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu D (2013) Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Sci. 59(1):102–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeon DS, Rochet JC (2010) The pricing of academic journals: a two-sided market perspective. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(2):222–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Prince J, Qiu C (2014) Indirect network effects and the quality dimension: A look at the gaming industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 37(November):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland HE (1979) Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. J. Political Econom. 87(6):1328–1346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Li S, Whinston AB (2011) Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2):171–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2017) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci. 64(7):3015–3032.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two‐sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronnen U (1991) Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. RAND J. Econom. 22(4):490–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song P, Xue L, Rai A, Zhang C (2018) The ecosystem of software platform: A study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance. MIS Quart. 42(1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stennek J (2014) Exclusive quality — why exclusive distribution may benefit the TV-viewers. Inform. Econom. Policy 26(March):42–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Kaiser H (2013) Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers’ market. Appl. Econom. 45(23):3360–3369.Crossref, Google Scholar