Changes in Risky Benefits and in Risky Costs: A Question of the Right Order

References

• Arrow KJ (1963) Liquidity preference. Lecture Notes for Economics 285, The Economics of Uncertainty (Stanford University, Stanford, CA), 33–53.Google Scholar
• Athey S (2002) Monotone comparative statics under uncertainty. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):187–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockett PL, Golden LL (1987) A class of utility functions containing all the common utility functions. Management Sci. 33(8):955–964.Link, Google Scholar
• Caballé J, Pomansky A (1996) Mixed risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 71(2):485–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng H-C, Magill MJ, Shafer WJ (1987) Some results on comparative statics under uncertainty. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28(2):493–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu H, Eeckhoudt L, Rey B (2012) On relative and partial risk attitudes: Theory and implications. Econom. Theory 50(1):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crainich D, Eeckhoudt L, Trannoy A (2013) Even (mixed) risk lovers are prudent. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1529–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denuit M, De Vylder E, Lefevre C (1999) Extremal generators and extremeal distributions for the continuous s-convex stochastic ordering. Insurance Math. Econom. 24(3):201–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denuit M, Lefevre C, Shaked M (1998) The s-convex orders among real random variables, with applications. Math. Inequalities Appl. 1(4):585–613.Google Scholar
• Dionne G, Gollier C (1992) Comparative statics under multiple sources of risk with applications to insurance demand. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory Issues Practice 17(1):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C (1993) Increases in risk and linear payoffs. Internat. Econom. Rev. 34(2):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S (2013) Even (mixed) risk lovers are prudent. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1536–1537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S (2020) Decision making when things are only a matter of time. Oper. Res. 68(5):1564–1575.Link, Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Nocetti DC, Schlesinger H (2018) Greater mutual aggravation. Management Sci. 64(6):2809–2811.Link, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):280–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2008) Changes in risk and the demand for saving. J. Monetary. Econom. 55(7):1329–1336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (2005) Economic and Financial Decisions Under Risk (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekern S (1980) Increasing nth degree risk. Econom. Lett. 6(4):329–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P, Porter R (1976) Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: Effects of changes in rate of return and risk. Management Sci. 22(10):1064–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Hadar J, Seo TK (1990) The effects of shifts in a return distribution on optimal portfolios. Internat. Econom. Rev. 31(3):721–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadar J, Seo TK (1992) A note on beneficial changes in random variables. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory Issues Practice 17(2):171–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jouini E, Napp C, Nocetti D (2013) Economic consequences of nth-degree risk increases and nth-degree risk attitudes. J. Risk Uncertainty 47(2):199–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim I, Ryu S (2020) General stochastic dominance rules. Hosoe M, Kim I, eds. Applied Economic Analysis of Information and Risk (Springer, Berlin), 127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L (2014) Precautionary saving in the large: nth degree deterioration in future income. J. Math. Econom. 52(2014):169–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Meyer J (2017) The increasing convex order and the trade-off of size for risk. J. Risk Insurance 84(3):881–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menegatti M (2001) On the conditions for precautionary saving. J. Econom. Theory 98(1):189–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menegatti M (2015) New results on high-order risk changes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(2):678–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menegatti M, Peter R (2020) Risk effects on optimal decision making—a question of the right order. Preprint, submitted May 22, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3585380.Google Scholar
• Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(5):921–932.Google Scholar
• Menezes CF, Wang XH (2005) Increasing outer risk. J. Math. Econom. 41(7):875–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J (1992) Beneficial changes in random variables under multiple sources of risk and their comparative statics. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory Issues Practice 17(1):7–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mossin J (1968) Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J. Political Econom. 46(4):553–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocetti D (2016) Robust comparative statics of risk changes. Management Sci. 62(5):1381–1392.Link, Google Scholar
• Pratt J (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1–2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1970) Increasing risk. I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1971) Increasing risk. II. Its economic consequences. J. Econom. Theory 3(1):66–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandmo A (1971) On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61(1):65–73.Google Scholar
• Schlesinger H (2013) The theory of insurance demand. Dionne G, ed. Handbook of Insurance (Springer, Berlin), 167–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott RC, Horvath PA (1980) On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. J. Finance 35(4):915–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Stochastic Orders (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith V (1968) Optimal insurance coverage. J. Political Econom. 76(1):68–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis D (1978) Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. 26(2):305–321.Link, Google Scholar