Bargaining at Retail Stores: Evidence from Vienna

References

• Backus M, Blake T, Larsen B, Tadelis S (2020) Sequential bargaining in the field: Evidence from millions of online bargaining interactions. Quart. J. Econom. 135:1319–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P (2001) Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77(3):623–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2014) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Management Sci. 60(12):2859–2885.Link, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Delmastro M (1999) Some stylized facts on organization and its evolution. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 40(3):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cragg JG (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39(5):829–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frenzen H, Hansen A-K, Krafft M, Mantrala MK, Schmidt S (2010) Delegation of pricing authority to the sales force: An agency-theoretic perspective of its determinants and impact on performance. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(1):58–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen A-K, Joseph K, Krafft M (2008) Price delegation in sales organizations: An empirical investigation. Bus. Res. 1(1):94–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg C, Jensen O, Hahn A (2012) How to organize pricing? Vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion of pricing authority. J. Marketing 76(5):49–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard V (2015) From Main Street to Mall: The Rise and Fall of the American Department Store (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Jindal P, Newberry P (2018) To bargain or not to bargain: The role of fixed costs in price negotiations. J. Marketing Res. 55(6):832–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph K (2001) On the optimality of delegating pricing authority to the sales force. J. Marketing 65(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kent SA (1983) The Quaker ethic and the fixed price policy: Max Weber and beyond. Sociol. Inquiry 53(1):16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kräkel M, Schöttner A (2020) Delegating pricing authority to sales agents: The impact of kickbacks. Management Sci. 66(6):2686–2705.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R (1986) Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. 5(2):159–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2016) Bargaining in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(10):3039–3058.Link, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ham SH (2014) Relationship organization and price delegation: An experimental study. Management Sci. 60(3):586–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Lo D, Dessein W, Ghosh M, Lafontaine F (2016) Price delegation and performance pay: Evidence from industrial sales forces. J. Law Econom. Organ. 32(3):508–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Prasad A (2004) Centralized pricing versus delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. 23(1):21–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Prasad A (2005) Delegating pricing decisions in competitive markets with symmetric and asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 24(3):490–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Ortega J (2009) Why do employers give discretion? Family versus performance concerns. Industry Relations 48(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Şimşek AS, Van Ryzin G (2015) The effectiveness of field price discretion: Empirical evidence from auto lending. Management Sci. 61(8):1741–1759.Link, Google Scholar
• Qian Y (1994) Incentives and loss of control in an optimal hierarchy. Rev. Econom. Stud. 61(3):527–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J (2014) Why do salespeople spend so much time lobbying for low prices? Marketing Sci. 33(6):796–808.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephenson PR, Cron WL, Frazier GL (1979) Delegating pricing authority to the sales force: The effects on sales and profit performance. J. Marketing 43(2):21–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg CB (1975) An optimal commission plan for salesmen’s control over price. Management Sci. 21(8):937–943.Link, Google Scholar