No Magic for Market Entry in the Field: Evidence from Taxi Markets
Published Online:28 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4099
References
- (2021) Spatial equilibrium, search frictions and dynamic efficiency in the taxi industry. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. NBER Working Paper 23296, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2002) Testing mixed-strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: The case of penalty kicks in soccer. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1138–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) A generalized cognitive hierarchy model of games. Games Econom. Behav. 99:257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. J. Econom. Lit. 51(1):5–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Uniform pricing in us retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Coordination, “magic,” and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games Econom. Behav. 23(2):146–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Frictions in a competitive, regulated market: Evidence from taxis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2954–2992.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in US local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3130–3161.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Are all managers created equal? J. Marketing Res. 46(5):612–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Learning by driving: Productivity improvements by New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(1):70–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Labor market equilibration: Evidence from Uber. Working paper, Uber Technologies, San Francisco. https://eng.uber.com/research/labor-market-equilibration-evidence-from-uber/.Google Scholar
- (2020) Earn more by driving less. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
- (2019) Does strategic ability affect efficiency? Evidence from electricity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(12):4302–4342.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) An analysis of the market for taxicab rides in New York City. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(2):423–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2390–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organ. Sci. 18(3):440–454.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Professionals play minimax. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):395–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Equilibrium play in large group market entry games. Management Sci. 44(1):119–141.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Do firms maximize? Evidence from professional football. J. Polit. Econom. 114(2):340–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) eBay’s crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Sci. 56(7):1060–1073.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Daily labor supply and adaptive reference points. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(8):2417–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar

