Consumer Online Search with Partially Revealed Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4104

References

  • Brockett PL, Charnes A, Cooper WW, Learner D, Phillips FY (1995) Information theory as a unifying statistical approach for use in marketing research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 84(2):310–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplin A (2016) Measuring and modeling attention. Annual Rev. Econom. 8(1):379–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2016) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4446.Google Scholar
  • Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane MP (2014) A simple method to estimate the roles of learning, inventories and category consideration in consumer choice. J. Choice Modelling 13:60–72.Google Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Manage. Sci. 60(7):1632–1654.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hajivassiliou VA, Ruud PA (1994), Chapter 40 classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation. Handbook of Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier BV, Amsterdam), 2383–2441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herniter JD (1976) An Entropy Model of Brand Purchase Behavior, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. (Springer Nature, London), 76–81.Google Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2017) The probit choice model under sequential search with an application to online retailing. Management Sci. 63(11):3911–3929.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Matějka F, McKay A (2015) Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):272–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Mark. Res. 28(4):429–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(3):379–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tehrani SS, Ching AT (2019) A heuristic approach to explore: The value of perfect information, Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Paper (19-05).Google Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong E (2017) Simplicity in design: 4 ways to achieve simplicity in your designs. Accessed November 2017, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/simplicity-in-design-4-ways-to-achieve-simplicity-in-your-designsGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.