The Value of Price Discrimination in Large Social Networks

References

• Aiello W, Chung F, Lu L (2001) A random graph model for power law graphs. Experiment. Math. 10(1):53–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akbarpour M, Malladi S, Saberi A (2017) Just a few seeds more: Value of network information for diffusion. Preprint, submitted November 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062830.Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Chen N, Kim SH, Manshadi V (2018) Impact of network structure on new service pricing. Preprint, submitted August 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3236225.Google Scholar
• Arthur D, Motwani R, Sharma A, Xu Y (2009) Pricing strategies for viral marketing on social networks. The Fifth Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom., 101–112.Google Scholar
• Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM), 44–54.Google Scholar
• Ballester C, Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2006) Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player. Econometrica 74(5):1403–1417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Chandrasekhar AG, Duflo E, Jackson MO (2013) The diffusion of microfinance. Sci. 341(6144):1236498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Sci. 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch F, Quérou N (2013) Pricing in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 80:243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell A (2013) Word-of-mouth communication and percolation in social networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2466–2498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Chamley C (2004) Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Zenou Y, Zhou J (2018) Competitive pricing strategies in social networks. RAND J. Econom. 49(3):672–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhary V, Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rajan U (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Sci. 51(7):1120–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung F, Lu L (2002) The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(25):15879–15882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung F, Lu L, Vu V (2004) The spectra of random graphs with given expected degrees. Internet Math. 1(3):257–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Harsha P (2020) Designing price incentives in a network with social interactions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):292–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Crapis D, Ifrach B, Maglaras C, Scarsini M (2016) Monopoly pricing in the presence of social learning. Management Sci. 63(11):3586–3608.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis TA, Hu Y (2011) The University of Florida sparse matrix collection. ACM Trans. Math. Software 38(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domingos P, Richardson M (2001) Mining the network value of customers. Proc. Seventh ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM), 57–66.Google Scholar
• Du C, Cooper WL, Wang Z (2016) Optimal pricing for a multinomial logit choice model with network effects. Oper. Res. 64(2):441–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Elmachtoub AN, Gupta V, Hamilton M (2021) The value of personalized pricing. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3821.Google Scholar
• Erdos P, Rényi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publication Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. 5(1):17–60.Google Scholar
• Fainmesser IP, Galeotti A (2015) Pricing network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):165–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fainmesser IP, Galeotti A (2020) Pricing network effects: Competition. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 12(3):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan K (1950) On a theorem of Weyl concerning eigenvalues of linear transformations II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36(1):31–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(1):70–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol MA, Garriga E (2009) Number of walks and degree powers in a graph. Discrete Math. 309(8):2613–2614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Goyal S, Jackson MO, Vega-Redondo F, Yariv L (2010) Network games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(1):218–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haghpanah N, Immorlica N, Mirrokni V, Munagala K (2013) Optimal auctions with positive network externalities. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 1(2):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartline J, Mirrokni V, Sundararajan M (2008) Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM), 189–198.Google Scholar
• Janson S, Knuth DE, Łuczak T, Pittel B (1993) The birth of the giant component. Random Structures Algorithms 4(3):233–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. Ninth ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM), 137–146.Google Scholar
• Kimber A (1983) A note on Poisson maxima. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verwandte Geb. 63(4):551–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krivelevich M, Sudakov B (2003) The largest eigenvalue of sparse random graphs. Combin. Probab. Comput. 12(1):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network data set collection. Accessed May 23, 2018, http://snap.stanford.edu/data.Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Lang KJ, Dasgupta A, Mahoney MW (2009) Community structure in large networks: Natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters. Internet Math. 6(1):29–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DA, Peres Y (2017) Counting walks and graph homomorphisms via Markov chains and importance sampling. Amer. Math. Monthly 124(7):637–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molloy M, Reed B (1995) A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random Structures Algorithms 6(2–3):161–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Momot R, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) The use and value of social information in selective selling of exclusive products. Management Sci. 66(6):2610–2627.Link, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Sci. 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman ME (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2):167–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman ME, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ (2001) Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E 64(2):026118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obama White House Report (2015) Big data and differential pricing. Accessed February 15, 2018, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/docs/Big_Data_Report_Nonembargo_v2.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14):3200–3203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preciado VM, Rahimian MA (2017) Moment-based spectral analysis of random graphs with given expected degrees. IEEE Trans. Network Sci. Engrg. 4(4):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson M, Domingos P (2002) Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. Proc. Eighth ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM), 61–70.Google Scholar
• Richardson M, Agrawal R, Domingos P (2003) Trust management for the semantic web. Internat. Semantic Web Conf. (Springer), 351–368.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1976) New product adoption and diffusion. J. Consumer Res. 2(4):290–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2007) Local network effects and complex network structure. BE J. Theoretical Econom. 7(1):1–37.Google Scholar
• Takac L, Zabovsky M (2012) Data analysis in public social networks. International Scientific Conference and International Workshop Present Day Trends of Innovations, vol. 1. https://snap.stanford.edu/data/soc-pokec.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wang R, Wang Z (2017) Consumer choice models with endogenous network effects. Management Sci. 63(11):3944–3960.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Chen YJ (2018) Technical note—Optimal pricing with sequential consumption in networks. Oper. Res. 66(5):1218–1226.Link, Google Scholar