The Role of Participation in Innovation Contests

References

• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Chawla S, Hartline JD, Sivan B (2019) Optimal crowdsourcing contests. Games Econom. Behav. 113(2019):80–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S (2017) Making the best idea better: The role of idea pool structure. Production Oper. Management 26(10):1946–1959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton RL, McAfee RP (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (1997) Does implementing an effective TQM program actually improve operating performance? Empirical evidence from firms that have won quality awards. Management Sci. 43(9):1258–1274.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2008) The effect of product introduction delays on operating performance. Management Sci. 54(5):878–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao RO (2014) Tolerance for failure and incentives for collaborative innovation. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1265–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchison-Krupat J, Kavadias S (2015) Strategic resource allocation: Top-down, bottom-up, and the value of strategic buckets. Management Sci. 61(2):391–412.Link, Google Scholar
• Hutchison-Krupat J, Kavadias S (2017) Organizational enablers for npd portfolio selection. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 65(1):59–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Kireyev P (2020) Markets for ideas: Prize structure, entry limits, and the design of ideation contests. RAND J. Econom. 51(2):563–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2018) Know when to run: Recommendations in crowdsourcing contests. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB, Wärneryd K (2006) Population uncertainty in contests. Econom. Theory 27(2):469–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nittala L, Krishnan V (2016) Designing internal innovation contests. Working Paper, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Sisak D (2009) Multiple-prize contests–the optimal allocation of prizes. J. Econom. Surveys 23(1):82–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Erat S, Lichtendahl KC Jr (2020) Prizes on crowdsourcing platforms: An equilibrium analysis of competing contests. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 875–876.Google Scholar
• Taylor CR (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2009) Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2016) Free Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar