Temporal Risk: Utility vs. Probability Weighting

References

• Abdellaoui M, Diecidue E, Öncüler A (2011) Risk preferences at di?erent time periods: An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 57(5):975–987.Google Scholar
• Ahlbrecht M, Weber M (1997) Preference for gradual resolution of uncertainty. Theory Decision 43(2):167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal R, Yaron A (2014) Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. J. Finance 59(4):1481–1509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH, Veira R (1998) Configural weighting in judgments of two-and four-outcome gambles. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 24(1):216–226.Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2010) Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica 78(4): 1375–1412.Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Ho JL (1994) Hope: An empirical study of attitude toward the timing of uncertainty resolution. J. Risk Uncertainty 8:267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epper T, Fehr-Duda H (2018) The missing link: Unifying risk taking and time discounting. Working Paper No. 96, University of Zurich Department of Economics, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Epstein LG (2008) Living with risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1121–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Zin SE (1989) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57(4):937–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Zin SE (1991) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 99(2):263–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Farhi E, Strzalecki T (2014) How much would you pay to resolve long-run risk? Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2680–2697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganguly A, Tasoff J (2017) Fantasy and dread: The demand for information and the consumption utility of the future. Management Sci. 63(12):4037–4060.Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38:129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Li Z, van Dolder D, Wakker PP (2021) Prince: An improved method for measuring incentivized preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 62(11):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Porteus EL (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46:185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• L’Haridon O, Vieider F (2019) All over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferences. Quant. Econom. 10(1):185–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Kahneman D (2000) Living with uncertainty: Attractiveness and resolution timing. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(2):179–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Orhun Y, Raymond C (2018) Intrinsic information and skewness. Preprint, submitted August 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3232350.Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM (1988) Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory. J. Math. Psych. 32(4):357–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mossin J (1969) A note of uncertainty and preference in a temporal context. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59:172–174.Google Scholar
• Nielsen K (2020) Preferences for the resolution of uncertainty and the timing of information. J. Econom. Theory 189:105090.Google Scholar
• Noussair C, Wu P (2006) Risk tolerance in the present and the future: An experimental study. Managerial Decision Econom. 27(6): 401–412.Google Scholar
• Peel DA, Zhang J (2009) The expo-power value function as a candidate for the work-horse specification in parametric versions of cumulative prospect theory. Econom. Lett. 105:326–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal U (1987) The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28:175–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal U (1990) Two-stage lotteries without the reduction axiom. Econometrica 58:349–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M, Zeckhauser RJ (1972) The effect of the timing of consumption decisions and the resolution of lotteries on the choice of lotteries. Econometrica 40:401–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Winden F, Krawczyk M, Hopfensitz A (2011) Investment, resolution of risk, and the role of affect. J. Econom. Psych. 32(6):918–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Gaudecker H-M, van Soest A, Wengstrom E (2011) Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):664–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G (1999) Anxiety and decision making with delayed resolution of uncertainty. Theory Decision 46:159–198.Crossref, Google Scholar