Customer Review Provision Policies with Heterogeneous Cluster Preferences

References

• Acemoglu D, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2018) Informational braess’ paradox: The effect of information on traffic congestion. Oper. Res. 66(4):893–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Alonso R, Câmara O (2016) Persuading voters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3590–3605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Android Developers Blog (2015) Creating better user experiences on google play. Accessed March 12, 2020, https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2015/03/creating-better-user-experiences-on.html.Google Scholar
• App Review (2020) Apple app review. Accessed March 12, 2020, https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Papanastasiou Y (2021). Seeding the herd: Pricing and welfare effects of social learning manipulation. Management Sci. 67(11):6734–6750. Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Tang CS (2015) The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1441–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S (2010) The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):944–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho S-H, Tang CS (2013) Advance selling in a supply chain under uncertain supply and demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):305–319.Link, Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (2005) Optimal Statistical Decisions, vol. 82 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ely JC (2017) Beeps. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(1):31–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2018) Surprise! Most consumers look at reviews before a purchase. Accessed March 12, 2020, https://www.emarketer.com/content/surprise-most-consumers-look-at-reviews-before-a-purchase.Google Scholar
• Feldman P, Papanastasiou Y, Segev E (2019) Social learning and the design of new experience goods. Management Sci. 65(4):1502–1519.Link, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M, Kamenica E (2014) Costly persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):457–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M, Kamenica E (2016) Competition in persuasion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):300–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Guo H (2015) Design of consumer review systems and product pricing. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):714–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2011) Social learning and dynamic pricing of durable goods. Marketing Sci. 30(5):851–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Kolotilin A, Mylovanov T, Zapechelnyuk A, Li M (2017) Persuasion of a privately informed receiver. Econometrica 85(6):1949–1964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lobel I, Sadler E (2016) Preferences, homophily, and social learning. Oper. Res. 64(3):564–584.Link, Google Scholar
• Müller A (2001) Stochastic ordering of multivariate normal distributions. Ann. Institute Statist. Math. 53(3):567–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Savva N (2017) Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Management Sci. 63(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu C, Che H, Chan TY, Lu X (2015) The economic value of online reviews. Marketing Sci. 34(5):739–754.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu M, Debo L, Kapuscinski R (2016) Strategic waiting for consumer-generated quality information: Dynamic pricing of new experience goods. Management Sci. 62(2):410–435.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang S, Narayan V, Zhao Y (2013) Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Sci. 32(1):153–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Fan X, Chen Y-J, Tang CS (2021) Information provision and farmer welfare in developing economies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):230–245.Link, Google Scholar