The Role of Feedback in Dynamic Crowdsourcing Contests: A Structural Empirical Analysis

References

• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aksin Z, Ata B, Emadi SM, Su CL (2013) Structural estimation of callers’ delay sensitivity in call centers. Management Sci. 59(12):2727–2746.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2019) Innovation and crowdsourcing contests. Hu M, ed. Invited Book Chapter in Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 379–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M (2010) Information feedback in a dynamic tournament. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):242–260. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Chernozhukov V, Hong H, Nekipelov D (2015) Identification and efficient semiparametric estimation of a dynamic discrete game. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
• Balogh E, Nass SJ, Patlak M (2010) Extending the Spectrum of Precompetitive Collaboration in Oncology Research: Workshop Summary (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356. Abstract, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Elmaghraby WJ, Moon K, Zhang W (2020) Managing market thickness in online business-to-business markets. Management Sci. 66(12):5783–5822.Link, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2015) “Open” disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Res. Policy 44(1):4–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank-order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Dai T, Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Sahin O, Tang CS, Xiao S (2020) OM forum-innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Dechenaux E, Kovenock D, Sheremeta RM (2015) A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):609–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Gilbert R, Stiglitz J, Tirole J (1983) Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. Eur. Econom. Rev. 22(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Goltsman M, Mukherjee A (2011) Interim performance feedback in multistage tournaments: The optimality of partial disclosure. J. Labor Econom. 29(2):229–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross DP (2017) Performance feedback in competitive product development. RAND J. Econom. 48(2):438–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halac M, Kartik N, Liu Q (2017) Contests for experimentation. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1523–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He P, Zheng F, Belavina E, Girotra K (2021) Customer preference and station network in the London bike-share system. Management Sci. 67(3):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2020) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. 67(5):2711–2728.Link, Google Scholar
• Igami M (2017) Estimating the innovator’s dilemma: Structural analysis of creative destruction in the hard disk drive industry, 1981–1998. J. Political Econom. 125(3):798–847. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Management Sci. 66(9):3803–3824.Link, Google Scholar
• Keane MP, Wolpin KI (1994) The solution and estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models by simulation and interpolation: Monte Carlo evidence. Rev. Econom. Stat. 76(4):648–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho SH (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalir IE (2017) Contest among contest organizers. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2020) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(8).Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on TaskCN. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Lowe DG (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proc. Seventh IEEE Internat. Conf. Comput. Vision, September 20–27 1999, vol. 2 (IEEE, Kerkyra), 1150–1157.Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576. Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1985) Distributional strategies for games with incomplete information. Math. Oper. Res. 10(4):619–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JW, Sweeting A (2016) Bailouts and the preservation of competition: The case of the federal timber contract payment modification act. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 8(3):257–288.Google Scholar
• Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeting A (2009) The strategic timing incentives of commercial radio stations: An empirical analysis using multiple equilibria. RAND J. Econom. 40(4):710–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y (2015) Estimating a war of attrition: The case of the US movie theater industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2204–2241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017a) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017b) The impact of visibility in innovation tournaments: Evidence from field experiments. Working paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar