The (In)Elasticity of Moral Ignorance

References

• Adena M, Huck S (2020) Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance. Management Sci. 66(2):722–743.Link, Google Scholar
• Albrecht K, Krämer F, Szech N (2017) Animal welfare and human ethics: A personality study. CESifo Working Paper No. 6609, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Kessler JB (2019) The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(1):236–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (2016) New research finds vast majority of americans concerned about farm animal welfare, confused by food labels and willing to pay more for better treatment. Press release, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York City.Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Australian Public Service Commission (2018) Reflect: APS values and code of conduct: Decision-making model. Australian Government. Accessed June 2, 2021, https://legacy.apsc.gov.au/reflect-aps-values-and-code-conduct-decision-making-model.Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2016) Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves (Worth Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Engl F, Weber RA (2014) Does willful ignorance deflect punishment? An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70:512–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhanot SP (2018) Isolating the effect of injunctive norms on conservation behavior: New evidence from a field experiment in California. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 163:30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Dimant E (2019) Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice, ePub ahead of print July 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Xiao E (2009) Do the right thing: But only if others do so. J. Behav. Decision Making 22(2):191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bomey N (2017) Ex-VW CEO: ‘I would have stopped’ the cheating but ‘I wasn’t informed.’” USA Today Online (January 19), https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/01/19/volkswagen-martin-winterkorn/96764832/.Google Scholar
• Broberg T, Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2007) Is generosity involuntary? Econom. Lett. 94(1):32–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwitschaft [German Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture] (2016) Deutscher Ernährungsreport [German nutrition report], Bonn (Germany).Google Scholar
• Cain DM, Dana J (2012) Paying people to look at the consequences of their actions. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York City).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrick R (2017) A frank discussion of your excuses for not giving to charity. The Globe and Mail Online (December 5), https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/household-finances/a-frank-discussion-of-your-excuses-for-not-giving-to-charity/article37196754/.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Samek A, van de Ven J (2020) What is deception in experimental economics? A survey. Working paper, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, He Y (2021) Information acquisition and provision in school choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Christie R, Geis FL (1970) Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CNN.com (2000) Manhattan museum plans to issue Holocaust looted-art study. Accessed April 6, 2021, http://www.cnn.com/2000/STYLE/arts/03/02/holocaust.art.reut/.Google Scholar
• d’Adda G, Gao Y, Golman R, Tavoni M (2018) It’s so hot in here: Information avoidance, moral wiggle room, and high air conditioning usage. Working paper, Universitá degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Dana J (2006) Strategic ignorance and ethical behavior in organizations. Tenbrunsel AE, ed. Ethics in Groups: Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 8 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Cain DM, Dawes RM (2006) ‘What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in a dictator game. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(2):193–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Schotter A (2010) Paying for confidence: An experimental study of the demand for non-instrumental information. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):304–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Mohlin E (2019) Decency. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Exley C (2015) Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):587–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley C (2020) Using charity performance metrics as an excuse not to give. Management Sci. 66(2):553–563.Link, Google Scholar
• Exley C, Petrie R (2018) The impact of a surprise donation ask. J. Public Econom. 158:152–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Szech N (2013) Morals and markets. Sci. 340(6133):707–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Szech N (2019) Competing image concerns: Pleasures of skills and moral values. Working paper, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Falk A, Neuber T, Szech N (2020) Diffusion of being pivotal and immoral outcomes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(5):2205–2229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feiler L (2014) Testing models of information avoidance with binary choice dictator games. J. Econom. Psych. 45:253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felgendreher S (2018) Do consumers choose to stay ignorant? The role of information in the purchase of ethically certified products. Working paper, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong CM, Oberholzer-Gee F (2011) Truth in giving: Experimental evidence on the welfare effects of informed giving to the poor. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):436–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freddi E (2021) Do people avoid morally relevant information? Evidence from the refugee crisis. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganguly AR, Tasoff J (2017) Fantasy and dread: The demand for information and the consumption utility of the future. Management Sci. 63(12):4037–4060.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Saccardo S, Serra-Garcia M, van Veldhuizen R (2020) Bribing the self. Games Econom. Behav. 120:311–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2017) Information avoidance. J. Econom. Literature 55(1):96–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z (2014) Strategic ignorance and the robustness of social preferences. Management Sci. 60(11):2659–2665.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z, van der Weele JJ (2017) Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(1):173–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guerrero AA (2007) Don’t know, don’t kill: Moral ignorance, culpability, and caution. Philos. Stud. 136:59–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M, List J, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I (2017) The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econom. 148:14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Engel C (2016) Homo ignorans: Deliberately choosing not to know. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 11(3):359–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hestermann N, Le Yaouanq Y, Treich N (2020) An economic model of the meat paradox. Eur. Econom. Rev. 129:103569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho E, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2020) Measuring information preferences. Management Sci. 67(1):126–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Szech N, Wenner L (2018) More effort with less pay: On information avoidance, optimistic beliefs and performance. Working paper, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany.Google Scholar
• Jackall R (1988) Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Internat. J. Politics Culture Soc. 1(4):598–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kajackaite A (2015) If I close my eyes, nobody will get hurt: The effect of ignorance on performance in a real-effort experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:518–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krawczyk M (2019) What should be regarded as deception in experimental economics? Evidence from a survey of researchers and subjects. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 79:110–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games. Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson T, Capra CM (2009) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment Decision Making 4(6):467–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Malmendier U, Weber RA (2012) Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(1):136–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind JT, Nyborg K, Pauls A (2019) Save the planet or close your eyes? Testing strategic ignorance in a charity context. Ecological Econom. 161:9–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2016) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49:433–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthey A, Regner T (2011) Do I really want to know? A cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior. Games 2(1):114–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 67(4):371–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller SM (1987) Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(2):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Momsen K, Ohndorf M (2020) When do people exploit moral wiggle room? An experimental analysis of information avoidance in a market setup. Ecological Econom. 169:106479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onwezen MC, van der Weele CN (2016) When indifference is ambivalence: Strategic ignorance about meat consumption. Food Quality Preference 52:96–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) Behavioural insights for public integrity harnessing the human factor to counter corruption. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Oster E, Shoulson I, Dorsey ER (2013) Optimal expectations and limited medical testing: Evidence from Huntington disease. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):804–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner S (2012) Uncomfortable knowledge: The social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses. Econom. Soc. 41(1):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen G (2003) Culpability and ignorance. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 103(1):61–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2007) Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(3):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serra-Garcia M, Szech N (2020) Demand for COVID-19 antibody testing, and why it should be free. CESifo Working Paper No. 8340, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. (London) 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Sicherman N, Loewenstein G, Seppi DJ, Utkus SP (2016) Financial attention. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):863–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiekermann K, Weiss A (2016) Objective and subjective compliance: A norm-based explanation of “moral wiggle room.” Games Econom. Behav. 96:170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stüber R (2020) The benefit of the doubt: Willful ignorance and altruistic punishment. Experiment. Econom. 23(3):848–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• te Velde H, Aarts N, van Woerkum C (2002) Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. J. Agricultural Environ. Ethics 15:203–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zane DM, Irwin JR, Reczek RW (2016) Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. J. Consumer Psych. 26(3):337–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57(298):348–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MJ (1997) Moral responsibility and ignorance. Ethics 107(3):410–426.Crossref, Google Scholar