Distributionally Robust Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Wasserstein Distances
Published Online:30 Dec 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4155
References
- (2018) Approaching mean-variance efficiency for large portfolios. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2890–2919.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Robust linear optimization under general norms. Oper. Res. Lett. 32(6):510–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Continuous-time mean–variance portfolio selection with bankruptcy prohibition. Math. Finance 15(2):213–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Distributionally robust groupwise regularization estimator. Preprint, submitted May 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04241.Google Scholar
- (2019) Quantifying distributional model risk via optimal transport. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):565–600.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Robust Wasserstein profile inference and applications to machine learning. Preprint, submitted October 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05627.Google Scholar
- (2019) Confidence regions in Wasserstein distributionally robust estimation. Preprint, submitted June 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01614.Google Scholar
- (2017) Data-driven optimal transport cost selection for distributionally robust optimization. Preprint, submitted May 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07152.Google Scholar
- (2002) Robust portfolio selection using linear-matrix inequalities. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 26(6):889–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection with finite transactions. Zhang T, Zhou X, eds. Stochastic Analysis and Applications to Finance, Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences, vol. 13 (World Scientific, Singapore), 77–98.Google Scholar
- (2010) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) “Dice”-sion–making under uncertainty: When can a random decision reduce risk? Management Sci. 65(7):3282–3301.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal vs. naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/n portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(5):1915–1953.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Robust portfolio optimization. J. Portfolio Management 33(3):40–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2):427–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) High-dimensional covariance matrix estimation in approximate factor models. Ann. Statist. 39(6):3320–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with wasserstein distance. Preprint, submitted April 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.02199.Google Scholar
- (2017) Wasserstein distributional robustness and regularization in statistical learning. Preprint, submitted December 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06050.Google Scholar
- (2003) Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. 51(4):543–556.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Oper. Res. 58(4):595–612.Google Scholar
- (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. 28(1):1–38.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) On the role of norm constraints in portfolio selection. Comput. Management Sci. 8:323–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) An interior-point method for a class of saddle-point problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 116:559–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Robustness (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distributionally robust optimization. Optimization Online. https://asset-pdf.scinapse.io/prod/2562747313/2562747313.pdf.Google Scholar
- Idzorek T (2007) A step-by-step guide to the Black-Litterman model: Incorporating user-specified confidence levels. Satchell S, ed. Forecasting Expected Returns in the Financial Markets, Quantitative Finance Series (Academic Press, London), 17–38.Google Scholar
- (2016) Data-drive chance constrained stochastic program. Math. Programming 158:291–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1942) On the transfer of masses. (in Russian) Comptes Rendus (Doklady) de I'Académie des Sciences de I'URSS 37(7–8):227–229.Google Scholar
- (2000) The worst-case risk of a portfolio. Accessed July 1, 2018, https://web.stanford.edu/∼boyd/papers/pdf/risk_bnd.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
- (1781) Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais (Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris, Paris).Google Scholar
- (2018) Technical note—A robust perspective on transaction costs in portfolio optimization. Oper. Res. 66(3):733–739.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Optimal shrinkage covariance matrix estimation under random sampling from elliptical distribution. Preprint, submitted August 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.10188.Google Scholar
- (2000) Minimax optimal control of stochastic uncertain systems with relative entropy constraints. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 45(3):398–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Ambiguity in portfolio selection. Quant. Finance 7(4):435–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Topics in Optimal Transportation. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58 (American Mathematics Society, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) A framework for optimization under ambiguity. Ann. Oper. Res. 193:21–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Data-driven risk-averse stochastic optimization with Wasserstein metric. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(2):262–267.Crossref, Google Scholar

