Resource Allocation Among Competing Innovators

References

• Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Harris C, Howitt P, Vickers J (2001) Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(3):467–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2014) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. GSIA Working Paper No. 2014-E17, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Li D (2020) Scientific grant funding. NBER Working Paper No. 26889, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Kouvelis P (2018) Introduction to the special issue on research at the interface of finance, operations, and risk management (iFORM): Recent contributions and future directions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Hege U (2005) The financing of innovation: Learning and stopping. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):719–752.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Valimaki J (2006) Bandit problems. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Sakakibara M (2002) When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(1):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budish E, Roin BN, Williams H (2015) Do firms underinvest in long-term research? Evidence from cancer clinical trials. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2044–2085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caballero RJ, Jaffe AB (1993) How high are the giants’ shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. NBER Macroconomics Annual 8:15–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Stylianos K, Gaimon C (2009) Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives, and new product development portfolio management. Management Sci. 55(9):1556–1569.Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Gale IL (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1996) Preemptive R&D, rent dissipation, and the “leverage theory.” Quart. J. Econom. 111(4):1153–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Ren L, Zhang D (2018) Financing small and medium-size enterprises via retail platforms. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Du TCT (2018) The rise and fall of bike-sharing platforms: A lesson in e-commerce. Perspectives@SMU working paper.Google Scholar
• Eldar O, Grennan J, Waldock K (2020) Common ownership and startup growth. Working Paper No. 2019-42.Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Lerner J (1998) What drives venture capital fundraising? Brookings Papers Microeconomics 1998:149–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1994) Managing innovation in the information age. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(1):100–105.Google Scholar
• Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1136–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2017) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2892683, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
• Igami M (2017) Estimating the innovator’s dilemma: Structural analysis of creative destruction in the hard disk drive industry, 1981–1998. J. Political Econom. 125(3):798–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2011) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J. Public Econom. 95(9-10):1168–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Strömberg PE (2004) Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. J. Finance 59(5):2177–2210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitch EW (1977) The nature and function of the patent system. J. Law Econom. 20(2):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R, Rammer C (2014) Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 35(2):246–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Le TT, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, Roman RG, Tollefsen S, Saville M, Mayhew S (2020) The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 19(5):305–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1999) The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. J. Bus. 72(3):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2012) Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed—and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Marshall G, Parra A (2019) Innovation and competition: The role of the product market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 65:221–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1961) Uncertainty, learning, and the economics of parallel research and development efforts. Rev. Econom. Statist. 43(4):351–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J. Political Econom. 104(4):724–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ning J, Babich V (2017) R&D investments in the presence of knowledge spillover and debt financing: Can risk shifting cure free riding? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(1):97–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Pérez-Castrillo D, Wettstein D (2016) Discrimination in a model of contests with incomplete information about ability. Internat. Econom. Rev. 57(3):881–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1982) A dynamic game of R and D: Patent protection and competitive behavior. Econometrica 50(3):671–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1983) Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(4):741–748.Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1985) Innovation and industry evolution. Quart. J. Econom. 100(1):81–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Thursby M (2005) University–incubator firm knowledge flows: Assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Res. Policy 34(3):305–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlapp J, Oraiopoulos N, Mak V (2015) Resource allocation decisions under imperfect evaluation and organizational dynamics. Management Sci. 61(9):2139–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 4th ed. (George Allen & Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (2000) Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Innovation Policy Econom. 1:119–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV (1984) A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Sci. 30(9):1051–1066.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhou J (2015) Information disclosure in contests: A Bayesian persuasion approach. Econom. J. 126(597):2197–2217.Google Scholar