Bunching with the Stars: How Firms Respond to Environmental Certification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4169

References

  • Ackerberg DA, Rysman M (2005) Unobserved product differentiation in discrete-choice models: Estimating price elasticities and welfare effects. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):771–788.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H, Sweeney RL (2016) The role of sales agents in information disclosure: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 63(1):21–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amacher GS, Koskela E, Ollikainen M (2004) Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling. J. Environ. Econom. Management 47(2):284–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amano T (2017) Ratcheting, competition, and the diffusion of technological change: The case of televisions under an energy efficiency program. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  • Berto Villas-Boas S (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):625–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P, Kalra A, Zhang W (2008) Research note—should consumers use the halo to form product evaluations? Management Sci. 54(1):217–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bonroy O, Constantatos C (2014) On the economics of labels: How their introduction affects the functioning of markets and the welfare of all participants. Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 97(1):239–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis LW, Metcalf GE (2016) Does better information lead to better choices? Evidence From energy-efficiency labels. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econom. 3(3):589–625.Google Scholar
  • Fischer C, Lyon TP (2014) Competing environmental labels. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(3):692–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GAO (2010) ENERGY STAR Program: Covert testing shows the ENERGY STAR program certification process is vulnerable to fraud and abuse. Report to congressional requesters, GAO-10-470, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • GAO (2011) ENERGY STAR providing opportunities for additional review of EPA’s decisions could strengthen the program. Report to congressional requesters, GAO-11-888, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Habel J, Schons LM, Alavi S, Wieseke J (2016) Warm glow or extra charge? The ambivalent effect of corporate social responsibility activities on customers’ perceived price fairness. J. Marketing 80(1):84–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harbaugh R, Maxwell JW, Roussillon B (2011) Label confusion: The Groucho Effect of uncertain standards. Management Sci. 57(9):1512–1527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heyes A, Martin S (2016) Social labeling by competing NGOs: a model with multiple issues and entry. Management Sci. 63(6):1800–1813.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horowitz MJ (2001) Economic indicators of market transformation: Energy efficient lighting and EPA’s green lights. Energy J. 22(4):95–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houde S (2018a) How consumers respond to product certification and the value of energy information. RAND J. Econom. 49(2):453–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houde S (2018b) The incidence of coarse certification: Evidence from the ENERGY STAR program. CER-ETH Econom. Working Paper Series), ETH Zurich. 18(290).Google Scholar
  • Ito K, Sallee JM (2018) The economics of attribute-based regulation: Theory and evidence from fuel economy standards. Rev. Econom. Statist. 100(2):319–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kok N, McGraw M, Quigley JM (2011) The diffusion of energy efficiency in building. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):77–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murali K, Lim MK, Petruzzi NC (2019) The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):519–535.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Murray AG, Mills BF (2011) Read the label! Energy Star appliance label awareness and uptake among US consumers. Energy Econom. 33(6):1103–1110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell RG, Siikamäki J (2014) Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econom. 1(4):555–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck E, Taylor TA (2019) Testing by competitors in enforcement of product standards. Management Sci. 65(4):1735–1751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rysman M, Simcoe T, Wang Y (2018) Differentiation strategies in the adoption of environmental standards: LEED From 2000–2014. Working paper, TBD.Google Scholar
  • Spurlock CA (2013) Appliance efficiency standards and price discrimination. Working Paper 6283E, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  • Vives X (1999) Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  • Ward DO, Clark CD, Jensen KL, Yen ST, Russell CS (2011) Factors influencing willingness-to-pay for the ENERGY STAR label. Energy Policy 39(3):1450–1458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.