Accounting Performance Goals in CEO Compensation Contracts and Corporate Risk Taking

References

• Abernethy MA, Dekker HC, Schulz AKD (2015) Are employee selection and incentive contracts complements or substitutes? J. Accounting Res. 53(4):633–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JD, Core JE (2017) Managerial incentives to increase risk provided by debt, stock, and options. Management Sci. 64(9):4408–4432.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CS, Vashishtha R (2012) Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value. J. Financial Econom. 104(1):70–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CS, Glaeser S, Huang S, Taylor DJ (2019) The economics of managerial taxes and corporate risk-taking. Accounting Rev. 94(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold MC, Artz M (2015) Target difficulty, target flexibility, and firm performance: Evidence from business units’ targets. Accounting Organ. Soc. 40:61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold M, Artz M (2019) The use of a single budget or separate budgets for planning and performance evaluation. Accounting Organ. Soc. 73:50–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett B, Bettis JC, Gopalan R, Milbourn T (2017) Compensation goals and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 124(2):307–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis C, Bizjak J, Coles J, Kalpathy S (2010) Stock and option grants with performance-based vesting provisions. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3849–3888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis C, Bizjak J, Coles J, Kalpathy S (2018) Performance-vesting provisions in executive compensation. J. Accounting Econom. 66(1):194–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis JC, Bizjak JM, Coles JL, Young B (2014) The presence, value, and incentive properties of relative performance evaluation in executive compensation contracts. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
• Bol JC (2011) The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1549–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boschen JF, Duru A, Gordon LA, Smith KJ (2003) Accounting and stock price performance in dynamic CEO compensation arrangements. Accounting Rev. 78(1):143–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJI (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouwens J, Kroos P (2011) Target ratcheting and effort reduction. J. Accounting Econom. 51(1–2):171–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Lee YJ (2011) Changes in option-based compensation around the issuance of SFAS 123R. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 38(9-10):1053–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burchman S, Jones B (2015) How to set threshold and maximum payouts that are tailor-made for your company. National Association of Corporate Directors. Accessed April 26, 2021, http://www.semlerbrossy.com/insights/how-to-set-threshold-and-maximum-payouts-that-are-tailor-made-for-your-company/.Google Scholar
• Cadman BD, Campbell JL, Klasa S (2016) Are ex ante CEO severance pay contracts consistent with efficient contracting? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 51(3):737–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campello M, Graham JR, Harvey CR (2010) The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. 97(3):470–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter ME, Lynch LJ, Tuna I (2007) The role of accounting in the design of CEO equity compensation. Accounting Rev. 82(2):327–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow CW, Cooper JC, Waller WS (1988) Participative budgeting: Effects of a truth-inducing pay scheme and information asymmetry on slack and performance. Accounting Rev. 63(1):111–122.Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Core J, Guay W (2002) Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. J. Accounting Res. 40(3):613–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis A, McVay S, Toynbee S (2020) The changing implications of research and development expenditures for future profitability. Rev. Accounting Stud. 25:405–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Wang C, Xie F (2010) Do executive stock options induce excessive risk taking? J. Banking Finance 34(10):2518–2529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Ozbas O, Sensoy BA (2010) Costly external finance, corporate investment, and the subprime mortgage credit crisis. J. Financial Econom. 97(3):418–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunk AS (1995) The joint effects of budgetary slack and task uncertainty. Accounting Finance 35(2):61–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Gabaix X, Jenter D (2017) Executive compensation: A survey of theory and evidence. Hermalin B, Weisbach M, eds. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, Handbooks in Economics, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 383–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhart R, Mahlendorf MD, Reimer M, Schäffer U (2017) Theorizing and testing bidirectional effects: The relationship between strategy formation and involvement of controllers. Accounting Organ. Soc. 61:36–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eskew RK, Faley RH (1988) Some determinants of student performance in the first college-level financial accounting course. Accounting Rev. 63(1):137–147.Google Scholar
• Fisher JG, Peffer SA, Sprinkle GB (2003) Budget‐based contracts, budget levels, and group performance. J. Management Accounting Res. 27(42):245–264.Google Scholar
• Fisher JG, Peffer SA, Sprinkle GB, Williamson MG (2015) Performance target levels and effort: Reciprocity across single- and repeated-interaction settings. J. Management Accounting Res. 27(2):145–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guay WR (1999) The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. J. Financial Econom. 53(1):43–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guay WR, Kepler JD, Tsui D (2019) The role of executive cash bonuses in providing individual and team incentives. J. Financial Econom. 133(2):441–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ham C, Seybert N, Wang S (2018) Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23:234–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy PM (1985) The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):85–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzhacker M, Kramer S, Matějka M, Hoffmeister N (2019) Relative target setting and cooperation. J. Accounting Res. 57(1):211–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Höppe F, Moers F (2011) The choice of different types of subjectivity in CEO annual bonus contracts. Accounting Rev. 86(6):2023–2046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, van Dijk MA, Zhang Y (2012) The implied cost of capital: A new approach. J. Accounting Econom. 53(3):504–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Indjejikian RJ, Nanda D (2002) Executive target bonuses and what they imply about performance standards. Accounting Rev. 77(4):793–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Indjejikian RJ, Matějka M, Merchant KA, Van Der Stede WA (2014) Earnings targets and annual bonus incentives. Accounting Rev. 89(4):1227–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John TA, John K (1993) Top‐management compensation and capital structure. J. Finance 48(3):949–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahle KM, Stulz RM (2013) Access to capital, investment, and the financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. 110(2):280–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, So E, Verdi R (2016) Analysts’ forecasts and asset pricing: A survey. Annu. Rev. Financial Econom. 8(1):197–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert RA (1986) Executive effort and selection of risky projects. RAND J. Econom. 17(1):77–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahlendorf MD, Matějka M, Schhffer U (2015) Target ratcheting and achievability of earnings targets. Working paper, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Nagel S (2011) Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):373–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matějka M (2018) Target setting in multi-divisional organizations. J. Management Accounting Res. 30(3):13–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matějka M, Ray K (2017) Balancing difficulty of performance targets: Theory and evidence. Rev. Accounting Stud. 22(4):1666–1697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrane V, Ackerman A (2015) US regulators revive work on incentive-pay rules. Wall Street Journal (April 17), https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-regulators-revive-work-on-incentive-pay-rules-1424132619.Google Scholar
• Merchant KA (1989) Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Enter Managers (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Merchant KA, Manzoni JF (1989) The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study. Accounting Rev. 64(3):539–558.Google Scholar
• Merchant KA, Stringer C, Shantapriyan P (2018) Setting financial performance thresholds, targets, and maximums in bonus plans. J. Management Accounting Res. 30(3):55–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ (2000) Performance standards in incentive contracts. J. Accounting Econom. 30(3):245–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien PC (1988) Analysts’ forecasts as earnings expectations. J. Accounting Econom. 10(1):53–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park H, Vrettos D (2015) The moderating effect of relative performance evaluation on the risk incentive properties of executives’ equity portfolios. J. Accounting Res. 53(5):1055–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters FS, Wagner AF (2014) The executive turnover risk premium. J. Finance 69(4):1529–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajgopal S, Shevlin T (2002) Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. J. Accounting Econom. 33(2):145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2A (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shields MD, Young SM (1993) Antecedents and consequences of participative budgeting: Evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information. J. Management Accounting Res. 5:265–280.Google Scholar
• Smith CW, Stulz RM (1985) The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 20(4):391–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• So EC (2013) A new approach to predicting analyst forecast errors: Do investors overweight analyst forecasts? J. Financial Econom. 108(3):615–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprinkle GB, Williamson MG, Upton DR (2008) The effort and risk-taking effects of budget-based contracts. Accounting Organ. Soc. 33(4–5):436–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Stede WA (2000) The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation. Accounting Organ. Soc. 25(6):609–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui D (2018) Value-risk tradeoffs and managerial incentives. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Yost BP (2018) Locked-in: The effect of CEOs’ capital gains taxes on corporate risk-taking. Accounting Rev. 93(5):325–358.Crossref, Google Scholar