A Model of Product Line Marketing

References

• Akerlof (1970) The market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, He C (2009) Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: A strategic analysis. Marketing Sci. 28(3):472–487.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2010) Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Sci. 56(4):621–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1701–1844.Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Ghose S (2003) Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions. J. Marketing 67(1):4–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caminal R (2007) Too many or too few varieties? The role of multiproduct firms. Preprint, submitted January 3, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=954594#.Google Scholar
• Champsaur P, Rochet J-C (1989) Multiproduct duopolists. Econometrica 57(3):533–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Spiegler R (2011) Consideration sets and competitive marketing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):235–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Matutes C (1993) Product line rivalry with brand differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. 41(3):223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grünfeld LA (2003) Meet me halfway but don’t rush: Absorptive capacity and strategic R&D investment revisited. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(8):1091–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui X, Chen Y-J (2014) Product line design with seller-induced learning. Management Sci. 60(3):784–795.Google Scholar
• John DR, Loken B, Joiner C (1998) The negative impact of extensions: Can flagship products be diluted? J. Marketing 62(1):19–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1992) Equilibrium product lines: Competing head-to-head may be less competitive. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(4):740–755.Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis(Dover Publications, Dover, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Putsis WP Jr, Bayus BL (2001) An empirical analysis of firms’ product line decisions. J. Marketing Res. 38(1):110–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes A (2015) Multiproduct retailing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swaminathan V, Fox RJ, Reddy SK (2001) The impact of brand extension introduction on choice. J. Marketing 65(4):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verboven F (1999) Product line rivalry and market segmentation–with an application to automobile optional engine pricing. J. Indust. Econom. 47(4):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2004) Communication strategies and product line design. Marketing Sci. 23(3):304–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Dukes A (2019) Product line design under preference uncertainty using aggregate consumer data. Marketing Sci. 38(4):669–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2011) The perils of behavior-based personalization. Marketing Sci. 30(1):170–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Zou T, Zhou B, Jiang B (2020) Product-line design in the presence of consumers’ anticipated regret. Management Sci 66(12):5665–5682.Link, Google Scholar