Do Board Gender Quotas Matter? Selection, Performance, and Stock Market Effects

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2003) Diversity and incentives in teams: Evidence from corporate boards. Working Paper, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Adams R, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ragunathan V (2013) Lehman sisters. FIRN Research Paper, posted September 3, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2380036.Google Scholar
• Adams R, Gray S, Nowland J (2012) Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Preprint, submitted November 2, 2011; last revised July 23, 2012, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Garofalo O, Minichilli A (2014) Gender interactions within the family firm. Management Sci. 60(5):1083–1097.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagues M, Esteve-Volart B (2010) Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77:1301–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagues M, Sylos Labini M, Zinovyeva N (2017) Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1207–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltrunaite A, Casarico A, Profeta P (2015) Affirmative action and the power of the elderly. CESifo Econopm. Stud. 61(1):148–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltrunaite A, Bello P, Casarico A, Profeta P (2014) Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. J. Public Econom. 118:62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender, chapter 17. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4b (Elsevier), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
• Besley TJ, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J (2017) Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2204–2242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianco M, Ciavarella A, Signoretti R (2015) Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance 23(2):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N (2014) Fluctuations in uncertainty. J. Econom. Perspective 28(2):153–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohern O, Staubo S (2014) Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational firm to avoid board upheaval. J. Corporate Finance 28:152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple L, Humphrey JE (2014) Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. J. Bus. Ethics 122:709–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conde-Ruiz JI, Ganuza J, Profeta P (2015) Statistical discrimination and the efficiency of quotas. Working paper, Fedea 2017/04.Google Scholar
• Consob (2015) Relazione annuale. Available at https://www.consob.it/web/area-pubblica/relazione-annuale.Google Scholar
• Dhir A (2015) Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Jung J (2011) Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias. North Carolina Law Rev. 89(3):809–840.Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2021) Valuation effects of Norway’s board gender-quota law revisited. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4031.Link, Google Scholar
• Engelstad F, Teigen M (2012) Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. (Emerald, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernàndez R (2013) Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labor force participation over a century. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):472–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernàndez R, Fogli A, Olivetti C (2004) Mothers and sons: Preference formation and female labor force dynamics. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1249–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D (2015) Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance 23(2):108–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flabbi L, Macis M, Moro A, Schivardi F (2019) Do female executives make a difference? The impact of female leadership on gender gaps and firm performance. Econom. J. (London) 129(622):2390–2423.Google Scholar
• Gagliarducci S, Paserman D (2015) The effect of female leadership on establishment and employee outcomes: evidence from linked employer-employee data. Res. Labor Econom. 41:341–372.Google Scholar
• Galasso V, Nannicini T (2011) Competing on good politicians. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(1):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giannetti M, Zhao M (2019) Board ancestral diversity and firm performance volatility. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54(3):1117–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzer HJ, Neumark D (2006) Affirmative action: What do we know? J. Policy Anal. Management 26(2):463–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsieh CT, Hurst E, Jones CI, Klenow PJ (2019) The allocation of talent and US economic growth. Econometrica 87(5):1439–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huse M, Seierstad C (2013) Getting women on to corporate boards: Consequences of the Norwegian gender balance law. Eur. Financial Rev. 12:37–39.Google Scholar
• IMF (2014) Annual Report 2014. From Stabilization to Sustainable Growth (IMF, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Jianakoplos NA, Bernasek A (1998) Are women more risk averse? Econom. Inquiry 36:620–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari S, Warner JB (2006) Econometrics of event studies (Empirical Corporate Finance), chapter 1. Espen Eckbo B, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, vol. A, Handbooks in Finance Series (Elsevier, North-Holland, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Lee PM, James EH (2007) She-e-os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management J. 28(3):227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mateos de Cabo R, Terjesen S, Escot L, Gimeno R (2019) Do “soft law” board gender quotas work? Evidence from a natural experiment. Eur. Management J. 37(5):611–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nygaard K (2011) Forced Board Changes: Evidence from Norway (Institutt for Samfunnsokonomi, The Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
• OECD (2012) Closing the Gender Gap (OECD Publishing, Paris).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pande R, Ford D (2011) Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background Paper for the World Development Report on Gender. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9120.Google Scholar
• Profeta P, Amidani Alberti L, Casarico A, D’Amico M, Puccio A(2014) Women Directors: The Italian Way and Beyond (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose C (2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance 2:404–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi F, Cebula R (2015) Stock market reactions to announcements of the board of directors: Evidence from Italy. Appl. Econom. 47(20):2102–2118.Google Scholar
• Ryan MK, Haslam SA (2005) The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British J. Management 16:81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Ziv M (2017) Gender and board activeness: The role of a critical mass. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 52(2):751–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seierstad C, Opsahl T (2011) For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Scandinavian J. Management 27(1):44–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solimene S, Coluccia D, Fontana S (2017) Gender diversity on corporate boards: An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies. Palgrave Comm. 3(1):16109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundèn AE, Surette BJ (1998) Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88:207–211.Google Scholar
• Van Der Walt N, Ingley C (2003) Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance 11(3):218–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M, Kelan E (2013) The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. J. Bus. Ethics 117:449–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfers J (2010) Diagnosing discrimination: Stock returns and CEO gender. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(2-3):531–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2021) The Global Gender Gap Report 2021. World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar