Michelin Is Coming to Town: Organizational Responses to Status Shocks

References

• Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):113–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askin N, Bothner MS (2016) Status-aspirational pricing: The “Chivas Regal” strategy in US higher education, 2006–2012. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):217–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2013) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Oliver C (1992) Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(4):540–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz L, Macaulay JR (1961) Some effects of differences in status level and status stability. Human Relations 14(2):135–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Prato M (2018) The structural origins of unearned status: How arbitrary changes in categories affect status position and market impact. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):668–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Lewis BW (2018) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):130–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the US. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cashen LH, Geiger SW (2004) Statistical power and the testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management research and recommendations for future studies. Organ. Res. Methods 7(2):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole JR, Singer B (1991) A theory of limited differences: explaining the productivity puzzle in science. Zuckerman H, Cole JR, Bruer JT, eds. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (Norton, New York), 277–310.Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Greenwood R (2016) How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):507–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demetry D (2013) Regimes of meaning: The intersection of space and time in kitchen cultures. J. Contemp. Ethnography 42(5):576–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, King AA, Verona G (2014) Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1645–1670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, King AA, Verona G (2015) Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Acad. Management J. 58(3):906–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Kremp PA (2016) Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity. Acad. Management J. 59(1):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton D (2003) Authenticity in art. Levinson J, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics (Oxford University Press), 258–274.Google Scholar
• Ferguson PP (2008) Michelin in America. Gastronomica 8(1):49–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gergaud O, Guzman LM, Verardi V (2007) Stardust over Paris gastronomic restaurants. J. Wine Econom. 2(1):24–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gergaud O, Storchmann K, Verardi V (2015) Expert opinion and product quality: Evidence from New York City restaurants. Econom. Inquiry 53(2):812–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City, New York).Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goode WJ (1978) The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman E (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman E, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jourdan J, Durand R, Thornton PH (2017) The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 123(1):232–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurafsky D (2014) The Language of Food: A Linguist Reads the Menu (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Jurafsky D, Chahuneau V, Routledge BR, Smith NA (2016) Linguistic markers of status in food culture: Bordieu’s distinction in a menu corpus. J. Cultural Analytics. 1(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Jensen M (2011) How product order affects market identity: Repertoire ordering in the US opera market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Johnson R (2014) Contrasting alternative explanations for the consequences of category spanning: A study of restaurant reviews and menus in San Francisco. Strategic Organ. 12(1):7–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakoff R (2006) Identity à la carte: You are what you eat. De Fina A, Schiffrin D, Bamberg M, eds. Discourse and Identity, Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, vol. 23 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 142–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman M (2004) Modification as social anxiety. Language Log. Accessed December 21, 2021, http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/∼myl/languagelog/archives/000912.html.Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malter D (2014) On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: Evidence from the Grands Crus Classés of the Médoc. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):271–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park DY, Podolny JM (2000) The competitive dynamics of status and niche width: US investment banking, 1920-1949. Indust. Corporate. Change. 9(3):377–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philippe D, Durand R (2011) The impact of norm‐conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):969–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Castellucci F (2014) Status in organization and management theory. J. Management 40(1):287–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Rees-Jones A, Blank C (2020) The negative consequences of loss-framed performance incentives. NBER Working Paper 26619, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prato M, Kypraios E, Ertug G, Lee YG (2019) Middle-status conformity revisited: The interplay between achieved and ascribed status. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1003–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sands D (2020) Michelin star…or target? The role(s) of third parties in value creation and capture. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Sauder M (2006) Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory Soc. 35(3):299–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Espeland W (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlenker BR (2002) Self-presentation. Leary MR, Tangney JP, eds. Handbook of Self and Identity (Guilford Press, New York), 492–518.Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ, Kovács B (2018) The many gifts of status: How attending to audience reactions drives the use of status. Management Sci. 64(11):5422–5443.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Jensen M (2019) A bridge too far: Divestiture as a strategic reaction to status inconsistency. Management Sci. 65(2):859–878.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wezel FC, Forgues B (2016) Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers’ devaluations? Acad. Management J. 59(1):135–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Painter J, van Ittersum K (2002) How descriptive menu labels influence attitudes and repatronage. Adv. Consumer Res. 29:168–172.Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zwicky AD, Zwicky AM (1980) America’s national dish: The style of restaurant menus. Amer. Speech 55(2):83–92.Crossref, Google Scholar