“Just Words? Just Speeches?” On the Economic Value of Charismatic Leadership

References

• Alimo-Metcalfe B, Alban-Metcalfe RJ (2001) The development of a new transformational leadership questionnaire. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 79:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Fenley M, Liechti S (2011) Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 10(3):374–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Fenley M, Liechti S (2012) Learning charisma: Transform yourself into someone people want to follow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June):127–130.Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Bastardoz N, Jacquart P, Shamir B (2016) Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):293–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quart. 21(6):1086–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G, Mazar N (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):451–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker GP (1992) Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Political Econom. 100(3):598–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks GC, Engemann KN, Williams CE, Gooty J, McCauley KD, Medaugh MR (2017) A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quart. 28:508–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1940) The Nature of Leadership (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bass BM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1995) MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire for Research: Permission Set (Mindgarden, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Waldman DA, Avolio BJ, Bebb M (1987) Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group Organ. Stud. 12(1):73–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Falk A, Tirole J (2018) Narratives, imperatives, and moral reasoning. NBER Working Paper No. w24798, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bott KM, Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2020) You’ve got mail: A randomized field experiment on tax evasion. Management Sci. 66(7):2801–2819.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2007) It’s what you say, not what you pay: An experimental study of manager-employee relationships in overcoming coordination failure. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1223–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ, Weber RA (2015) Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Sci. 61(11):2627–2645.Link, Google Scholar
• Burns JM (1978) Leadership (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Byron K, Khazanchi S (2012) Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psych. Bull. 138(4):809–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN, Menon ST, Mathur P (1997) Measuring charisma: Dimensionality and validity of the Conger‐Kanungo scale of charismatic leadership. Canadian J. Admin. Sci. [Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration] 14(3):290–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper WH, Richardson AJ (1986) Unfair comparisons. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):179–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronshaw SF, Lord RG (1987) Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 72(1):97–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• d’Adda G, Darai D, Pavanini N, Weber R (2017) Do leaders affect ethical conduct? An experimental study. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(6):1177–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó E, Dal Bó P (2014) “Do the right thing”: The effects of moral suasion on cooperation. J. Public Econom. 117:28–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM, McTavish J, Shaklee H (1977) Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Quidt J, Haushofer J, Roth C (2018) Measuring and bounding experimenter demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(11):3266–3302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Den Hartog DN, Verburg RM (1997) Charisma and rhetoric: Communicative techniques of international business leaders. Leadership Quart. 8(4):355–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Hoogh A, Den Hartog D, Koopman P (2004) De ontwikkeling van de CLIO: een vragenlijst voor charismatisch leiderschap in organisaties. Gedrag Organ. 17(5):354–381.Google Scholar
• Deutsch M, Epstein Y, Canavan D, Gumpert P (1967) Strategies of inducing cooperation: An experimental study. J. Conflict Resolution 11(3):345–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downton JV (1973) Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in the Revolutionary Process (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Eden D (2021) The science of leadership: A journey from survey research to field experimentation. Leadership Quart. 32(3):101472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Grimm S, Grothe D, Schindler D, Schudy S (2019) A field experiment on leadership and team performance in non-routine analytical team tasks. Working paper, University of Munich (LMU).Google Scholar
• Ernst BA, Banks G, Loignon AC, Frear KA, Williams CE, Arciniega LM, Gupta RK, Kodydek G, Subramanian D (2021) Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries. Leadership Quart. 101541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fest S, Kvaløy O, Nieken P, Schöttner A (2021) How (not) to motivate online workers: Two controlled field experiments on leadership in the gig economy. Leadership. Quart. 101514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer T, Hambrick DC, Sajons GB, Van Quaquebeke N (2020) Beyond the ritualized use of questionnaires: Toward a science of actual behaviors and psychological states. Leadership Quart. 31(4):101449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frese M, Beimel S, Schoenborn S (2003) Action training for charismatic leadership: Two evaluations of studies of a commercial training module on inspirational communication of a vision. Personnel Psych. 56:671–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. J. Appl. Psych. 9:108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1:114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gottfredson RK, Wright SL, Heaphy ED (2020) A critique of the leader-member exchange construct: Back to square one. Leadership Quart. 31(6):101385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güntner AV, Klonek FE, Lehmann-Willenbrock N, Kauffeld S (2020) Follower behavior renders leader behavior endogenous: The simultaneity problem, estimation challenges, and solutions. Leadership Quart. 31(6):101441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Levati MV, Sutter M, Van Der Heijden E (2007) Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments. J. Public Econom. 91(5-6):1023–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haushofer J, Shapiro J (2016) The short-term impact of unconditional cash transfers to the poor: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1973–2042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE (1998) Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88:1188–1206.Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE (2022) At the helm, Kirk or Spock? The pros and cons of charismatic leadership. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5:184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13:324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House RJ (1977) A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. Hunt JG, Larson LL, eds. The Cutting Edge (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL).Google Scholar
• Howell JM, Frost PJ (1989) A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 43(2):243–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacquart P, Antonakis J (2015) When does charisma matter for top-level leaders? Effect of attributional ambiguity. Acad. Management J. 58:1051–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Koopman PAR (1984) Confidence intervals for the ratio of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 40(2):513–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Am. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3:86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Rustagi D (2015) Leader punishment and cooperation in groups: Experimental field evidence from commons management in Ethiopia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):747–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S, Yang X (2014) Knowing that you matter, matters! The interplay of meaning, monetary incentives, and worker recognition. IZA Discussion Paper 8055, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvaløy O, Schöttner A (2015) Incentives to motivate. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvaløy O, Nieken P, Schöttner A (2015) Hidden benefits of reward: A field experiment on motivation and monetary incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 76:188–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank and order tournament: An optimal labor contract. J. Political Econom. 89:841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonati S, Quiroga BF, Zehnder C, Antonakis J (2018) On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. J. Oper. Management 64:19–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenzie D, Ozier O (2019) Why ex-post power using estimated effect sizes is bad, but an ex-post MDE is not. World Bank Development Impact Blog (May 16), https://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/why-ex-post-power-using-estimated-effect-sizes-bad-ex-post-mde-not.Google Scholar
• Meslec N, Curseu P, Fodor OC, Kenda R (2020) Effects of charismatic leadership and rewards on individual performance. Leadership Quart. 31(6):101423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minozzi W, Neblo MA, Esterling KM, Lazer DMJ (2015) Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(13):3937–3942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R (1990) Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on follower’s trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quart. 1(2):107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potters J, Sefton M, Vesterlund L (2007) Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study. Econom. Theory 33:169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sajons GB (2020) Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables. Leadership Quart. 31(5):101348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B, Arthur MB, House RJ (1994) The rhetoric of charismatic leadership: A theoretical extension, a case study, and implications for research. Leadership Quart. 5(1):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B, House RJ, Arthur MB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. 4(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Shea CM, Howell JM (1999) Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance. Leadership Quart. 10:375–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shearer B (2004) Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71:513–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sieweke J, Santoni S (2020) Natural experiments in leadership research: An introduction, review, and guidelines. Leadership Quart. 31(1):101338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towler AJ (2003) Effects of charismatic influence training on attitudes, behavior, and performance. Personnel Psych. 56(2):363–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tur B, Harstad J, Antonakis J (2021) Effect of charismatic signaling in social media settings: Evidence from TED and Twitter. Leadership Quart. 101476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, McGarty C (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(5):454–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Vugt M, De Cremer D (1999) Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(4):587–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman DA, Bass BM, Yammarino FJ (1990) Adding to contingent-reward behavior—The augmenting effect of charismatic leadership. Group Organ. Stud. 15(4):381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Parsons T, trans.) (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Willner AR (1984) The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership(Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl GA (1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quart. 10(2):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar