Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms

References

• Abernethy MA, Brownell P (1997) Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting Organ. Soc. 22(3-4):233–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abernethy MA, Bouwens J, Van Lent L (2004) Determinants of control system design in divisionalized firms. Accounting Rev. 79(3):545–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abernethy MA, Dekker HC, Schulz AKD (2015) Are employee selection and incentive contracts complements or substitutes? J. Accounting Res. 53(4):633–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York), 267–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Arya A, Mittendorf B, Ramanan R (2019) Beyond profits: The rise of dual-purpose organizations and its consequences for disclosure. Accounting Rev. 94(1):25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack BK (2014) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Potter G, Srinivasan D (2000) An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. Accounting Rev. 75(1):65–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2017) Profit with purpose? A theory of social enterprise. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(3):19–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2018) Prosocial motivation and incentives. Annu. Rev. Econom. 10:411–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner SE, Sprinkle GB (2002) The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting Organ. Soc. 27(4-5):303–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridgstock R, Lettice F, Özbilgin MF, Tatli A (2010) Diversity management for innovation in social enterprises in the UK. Entrepreneurial Regional Development 22(6):557–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D (2012) Employee selection as a control system. J. Accounting Res. 50(4):931–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Gong E (2016) Motivating agents: How much does the mission matter? J. Labor Econom. 34(1):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar L (2019) Job mission as a substitute for monetary incentives: Benefits and limits. Management Sci. 65(2):896–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan EW, Zhang X (2021) Understanding and deterring misreporting in nonprofits: The joint effects of pay level and penalty type. Accounting Rev. 96(4):157–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Levine D (2006) Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Rev. 48(2):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CX, Lill JB, Vance TW (2020a) Management control system design and employees’ autonomous motivation. J. Management Accounting Res. 32(3):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CX, Pesch HL, Wang LW (2020b) Selection benefits of below-market pay in social-mission organizations: Effects on individual performance and team cooperation. Accounting Rev. 95(1):57–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chenhall RH, Langfield-Smith K (1998) The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: An empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting Organ. Soc. 23(3):243–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chenhall RH, Moers F (2015) The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control. Accounting Organ. Soc. 47:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S (2007) A review of adoptability of BSC (balanced scorecard) to social service organizations in Korea. Seoul Stud. 8(4):189–209.Google Scholar
• Correia S (2015) Singletons, cluster-robust standard errors and fixed effects: A bad mix. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Dehaan E, Madsen J, Piotroski JD (2017) Do weather‐induced moods affect the processing of earnings news? J. Accounting Res. 55(3):509–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deller C, Sandino T (2020) Effects of a tournament incentive plan incorporating managerial discretion in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Sci. 66(2):911–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Dikolli SS, Hofmann C, Kulp SL (2009) Interrelated performance measures, interactive effort, and incentive weights. J. Management Accounting Res. 21(1):125–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A (2002) Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. J. Human Resources 37(4):696–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee (2012) The Social Economy in the European Union: Report drawn up for the European Economic and Social Committee by the International Centre of Research and Information on the Public, Social and Cooperative Economy (CIRIEC). Accessed January 10, 2022, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5ddb156a-2ed5-48c5-b6a7-5e44282b7da6.Google Scholar
• Eyring H (2020) Disclosing physician ratings: Performance effects and the difficulty of altering ratings consensus. J. Accounting Res. 58(4):1023–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feltham GA, Xie J (1994) Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. Accounting Rev. 69(3):429–453.Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong G, Li LY, Shin JY (2011) Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts. Accounting Rev. 86(3):1007–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna J (2010) The hard work of measuring social impact. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hecht G, Tafkov I, Towry KL (2012) Performance spillover in a multitask environment. Contempory Accounting Res. 29(2):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Van den Steen E (2015) Why do firms have “purpose”? The firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):326–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobson JL, Sommerfeldt RD, Wang LW (2021) Cheating for the cause: The effects of performance-based pay on socially oriented misreporting. Accounting Rev, 96(5):317–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoque Z, James W (2000) Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. J. Management Accounting Res. 12(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1998) Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. J. Accounting Res. 36:1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ittner CD, Larcker DF, Meyer MW (2003a) Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. Accounting Rev. 78(3):725–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ittner CD, Larcker DF, Randall T (2003b) Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting Organ. Soc. 28(7-8):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins GD Jr, Mitra A, Gupta N, Shaw JD (1998) Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. J. Appl. Psych. 83(5):777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korea Development Institute (2011) Research on capital market financing of social enterprises. KDI Focus, 6. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://www.kdi.re.kr/research/subjects_view.jsp?pub_no=11824.Google Scholar
• Kunz AH, Pfaff D (2002) Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting Organ. Soc. 27:275–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucero MA, Allen RE (1994) Employee benefits: A growing source of psychological contract violations. Human Resources Management 33(3):425–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company (2013) Building the social enterprise. Accessed January 10, 2022, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/building-the-social-enterprise.Google Scholar
• Martin J (1981) Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 3 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 53–107.Google Scholar
• Matsumura EM, Shin JY (2006) An empirical analysis of an incentive plan with relative performance measures: Evidence from a postal service. Accounting Rev. 81(3):533–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merchant KA, Van der Stede WA (2007) Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives (Pearson Education, Essex, England).Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Roberts JD (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Roberts JD (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Roberts JD (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2-3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moers F (2006) Performance measure properties and delegation. Accounting Rev. 81(4):897–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen KJ, Frank RG, Rosenthal MB (2010) Can you get what you pay for? Pay‐for‐performance and the quality of healthcare providers. RAND J. Econom. 41(1):64–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikias AD, Schwartz S, Young RA (2005) Optimal performance measures with task complementarity. J. Management Accounting Res. 17(1):53–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royce M (2007) Using human resource management tools to support social enterprise: Emerging themes from the sector. Soc. Enterprise J. 3(1):10–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serafeim G, Rouen E, Freiberg D (2020) SK Group: Social Progress Credits. HBS No.120-071 (Harvard Business School, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Simons R (2000) Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ströbele A, Wentges P (2018) The role of organizational social capital in the design of management control systems. J. Management Accounting Res. 30(2):187–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker JW (2010) Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. J. Accounting Literature 29:31–57.Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation (Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2003) Complementarity, task assignment, and incentives. J. Management Accounting Res. 15(1):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar