Profitability and Financial Leverage: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

References

• Abel A (2018) Optimal debt and profitability in the trade-off theory model. J. Finance 73(1):95–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker M, Wurgler J (2002) Market timing and capital structure. J. Finance 57(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M (2000) Streamlining the Federal Trademark Dilution Act to apply to truly famous marks. Iowa Law Rev. 85:1387–1471.Google Scholar
• Beebe B (2007) The continuing debacle of U.S. antidilution law: Evidence from the first year of Trademark Dilution Revision Act case law. Santa Clara High Tech. Law J. 24(3):449–467.Google Scholar
• Belonozhko N (2015) Famous trademarks in fashion: Why federal trademark dilution law favors a monopoly over small business success. Willamette Law Rev. 51(3):365–406.Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cendali D, Schriefer B (2006) The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006: A welcome and needed-change. Michigan Law Rev. First Impressions 105(1):108–112.Google Scholar
• Chava S, Nanda V, Xiao S (2017) Lending to innovative firms. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 6(2):234–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornaggia K, Franzen L, Simin T (2013) Bringing leased assets onto the balance sheet. J. Corporate Finance 22:345–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danis A, Rettl D, Whited T (2014) Refinancing, profitability, and capital structure. J. Financial Econom. 114(3):424–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Whited T (2011) Capital structure dynamics and transitory debt. J. Financial Econom. 99(2):235–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeAngelo H, Gonçalves A, Stulz R (2018) Corporate deleveraging and financial flexibility. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(8):3122–3174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis D, McKeon S (2012) Debt financing and financial flexibility evidence from proactive leverage increases. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(6):1897–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dollinger P (2001) The Federal Trademark Anti-Dilution Act: How famous is famous? Working paper.Google Scholar
• Duffy G (1997) Trademark dilution under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995: You’ve come a long way baby—Too far maybe? South Texas Law Rev. 39:133–164.Google Scholar
• Eckbo E, Kisser M (2021) The leverage-profitability puzzle resurrected. Rev. Finance 25(4):1089–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisfeldt A, Rampini A (2009) Leasing, ability to repossess, and debt capacity. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(4):1621–1657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (2002) Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev. Financial Stud. 15(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farre-Mensa J, Hegde D, Ljungqvist A (2020) What is a patent worth? Evidence from the U.S. patent “lottery.” J. Finance 75(2):639–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkender M, Flannery MJ, Hankins KW, Smith JM (2012) Cash flows and leverage adjustments. J. Financial Econom. 103(3):632–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Rangan KP (2006) Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. J. Financial Econom. 79(3):469–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank M, Goyal V (2009) Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management 38(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank M, Goyal V (2015) The profits-leverage puzzle revisited. Rev. Finance 19(4):1415–1453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR (1996) Debt and the marginal tax rate. J. Financial Econom. 41(1):41–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Lemmon M, Schallheim J (1998) Debt, leases, and the endogeneity of corporate tax status. J. Finance 53(1):131–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath D, Mace C (2020) The strategic effects of trademark protection. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(4):1848–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessy C, Whited T (2005) Debt dynamics. J. Finance 60(3):1129–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):169–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PE (2001) Preventing dilution of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act: Why the FTDA requires actual economic harm. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 50(2):719–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klasa S, Ortiz-Molina H, Serfling M, Srinivasan S (2018) Protection of trade secrets and capital structure decisions. J. Financial Econom. 128(2):226–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary M, Roberts M (2005) Do firms rebalance their capital structures? J. Finance 60(6):2575–2619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary M, Roberts M (2010) The pecking order, debt capacity, and information asymmetry. J. Financial Econom. 95(3):332–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemmon M, Zender J (2010) Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(5):1161–1187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maksimovic V (1988) Capital structure in repeated oligopolies. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):389–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann W (2018) Creditor rights and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 130(1):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manyika J, Roxburgh C (2011) The Great Transformer: The Impact of the Internet on Economic Growth and Prosperity (McKinsey Global Institute, New York).Google Scholar
• Myers S (1993) Still searching for optimal capital structure. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 6(1):4–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswald LJ (1999) Tarnishment and blurring under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995. Amer. Bus. Law J. 36(2):255–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ovtchinnikov A (2010) Capital structure decisions: Evidence from deregulated industries. J. Financial Econom. 95(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulliam A (2003) Raising the bar too high: Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. and relief under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act. Catholic Univ. Law Rev. 53:887–911.Google Scholar
• Saidi F, Zaldokas A (2020) How does firms’ innovation disclosure affect their banking relationships? Management Sci. 67(2):742–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Strebulaev I (2007) Do tests of capital structure theory mean what they say? J. Finance 62(4):1747–1787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I (2004) Capital structure and stock returns. J. Political Econom. 112(1):106–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whited T, Wu G (2006) Financial constraints risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 19(2):531–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welkowitz DS (2012) Trademark Dilution: Federal, State, and International Law, 2nd ed. (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Xu J (2012) Profitability and capital structure: Evidence from import penetration. J. Financial Econom. 106(2):427–446.Crossref, Google Scholar