Rank-Dependent Utility Under Multiple Priors

References

• Abdellaoui M (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46(11):1497–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M (2002) A genuine rank-dependent generalization of the Von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theorem. Econometrica 70(2):717–736. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Wakker PP (2005) The likelihood method for decision under uncertainty. Theory Decision 58:3–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O (2008) A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):245–266.Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) L’extension des théories de l’équilibre économique général et du rendement social au cas du risque. Econometrica 21(2):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alon S, Schmeidler D (2014) Purely subjective maxmin expected utility. J. Econom. Theory 152:382–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1974) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, vol. 121 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Baillon A, L’Haridon O, Placido L (2011) Ambiguity models and the Machina paradoxes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1547–1560. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean M, Ortoleva P (2017) Allais, Ellsberg, and preferences for hedging. Theoretical Econom. 12:377–424. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean M, Ortoleva P (2018) Is it all connected? A testing ground for unified theories of behavioral economics phenomena. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Dillenberger D, Segal U (2015) Recursive ambiguity and Machina’s examples. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(1):55–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Dominiak A, Lefort J-P (2021) Ambiguity and probabilistic information. Management Sci. 67(7):4310–4326.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psych. Bull. 51(4):380–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG (1999) A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):579–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P, Edwards W (1997) Discount-neutral utility models for denumerable time streams. Theory Decision 43:139–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Marinacci M (2002) Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. J. Econom. Theory 102(2):251–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Siniscalchi M (2003) A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica 71(6):1897–1908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I (1987) Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. 16(1):65–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Minardi S, Samuelson L, Schmeidler D (2020) States and contingencies: How to understand Savage without anyone being hanged. Revue Économique 71:365–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S, Polak B, Strzalecki T (2009) Second-order expected utility. Working paper, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
• Gul F (1998) A comment on Aumann’s Bayesian view. Econometrica 66(4):923–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP, Sargent TJ (2008) Robustness (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey CM (1986) Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. 32(9):1123–1139. Link, Google Scholar
• He Y (2021) Revisiting Ellsberg’s and Machina’s paradoxes: A two-stage evaluation model under ambiguity. Management Sci. 67(11):6897–6914.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2003) Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: A generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28(3):395–423.Link, Google Scholar
• L’Haridon O, Placido L (2010) Betting on Machina’s reflection example: An experiment on ambiguity. Theory Decision 69:375–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6):1447–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (2009) Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):385–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (2014) Ambiguity aversion with three or more outcomes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3814–3840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston MG, Baratta P (1948) An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. Amer. J. Psych. 61(2):183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal U (1987) The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28(1):175–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strzalecki T (2011) Axiomatic foundations of multiplier preferences. Econometrica 79(1):47–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2 (Wiley), 89–116.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Wakker PP (1995) Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica 63(6):1255–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vind K (1991) Independent preferences. J. Math. Econom. 20(1):119–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (Dordorecht).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (1994) Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory Decision 36:1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang F (2019) Comparative ambiguity attitudes. Working paper, ESSEC, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Werner J (2005) A simple axiomatization of risk-averse expected utility. Econom. Lett. 88(1):73–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar