Self-Selection of Peers and Performance

References

• Ager P, Bursztyn L, Leucht L, Voth HJ (2021) Killer incentives: Rivalry, performance and risk-taking among German fighter pilots, 1939-45. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Allport FH (1920) The influence of the group upon association and thought. J. Experiment. Psych. 3(3):159–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Elder TE, Taber CR (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113(1):151–184. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2013) Discretion, productivity, and work satisfaction. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. 169(1):4–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckmann M, Cornelissen T, Kräkel M (2017) Self-managed working time and employee effort: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 133:285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):608–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, van de Ven J (2011) Friendships and favouritism on the schoolground—A framed field experiment. Econom. J. (London) 121(557):1228–1251.Google Scholar
• Betts JR (2011) The economics of tracking in education. Hanushek EA, Machin S, Woessmann L, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 341–381.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bó PD, Foster A, Putterman L (2010) Institutions and behavior: Experimental evidence on the effects of democracy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2205–2229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper D, Weber R (2014) Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Sci. 61(11):2627–2645.Link, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Ederer F, Ferman B, Yuchtman N (2014) Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Econometrica 82(4):1273–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell S, Sacerdote B, West J (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar L, Meier S (2018) Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):215–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TJ, Lam CT (2015) Type of peers matters: A study of peer effects of friends, studymates and seatmates on academic performance. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Chen R, Gong J (2018) Can self selection create high-performing teams? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 148:20–33. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Chen MK, Rossi PE, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicala S, Fryer R, Spenkuch J (2018) Self-selection and comparative advantage in social interactions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 16(4):983–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, Hernán-González R (2015) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.Link, Google Scholar
• Deci E, Ryan R (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E, Ryan R (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psych. Inquiry 11(4):227–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Isphording I (2017) A big fish in a small pond: Ability rank and human capital investment. J. Labor Econom. 35(3):787–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2011) The tradeoff between performance and quitting in high power tournaments. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(2):318–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friebel G, Heinz M, Hoffman M, Zubanov N (2020) What do employee referral programs do? Measuring the direct and overall effects of a management practice. NBER Working Paper No. 25920, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fu C, Mehta N (2018) Ability tracking, school and parental effort, and student achievement: A structural model and estimation. J. Labor Econom. 36(4):923–979. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garlick R (2018) Academic peer effects with different group assignment policies: Residential tracking versus random assignment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 10(3):345–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons F, Buunk B (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(1):129–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Kissová Z, Lee J, Prowse V (2019) First-place loving and last-place loathing: How rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision. Management Sci. 65(2):494–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golsteyn B, Non A, Zölitz U (2021) The impact of peer personality on academic achievement. J. Political Econom. 129(4):1052–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbst D, Mas A (2015) Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Sci. 350(6260):545–549. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt PJ, Hillery JM (1973) Social facilitation in a coaction setting: An examination of the effects over learning trials. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 9(6):563–571. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irving R (1985) An efficient algorithm for the “stable roommates” problem. J. Algorithms 6(4):577–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson CK, Bruegmann E (2009) Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):85–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiessling L, Norris J (2020) The long-run effects of peers on mental health. Discussion Paper 2020/12, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn.Google Scholar
• Kiessling L, Radbruch J, Schaube S (2020) Determinants of peer selection. CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper No. 092, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
• Koch AK, Nafziger J (2011) Self-regulation through goal setting. Scandinavian J. Econom. 113(1):212–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kräkel M (2016) Peer effects and incentives. Games Econom. Behav. 97:120–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Oyer P (2012) Personnel economics. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Shaw K (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):91–114. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt S, List J, Neckermann S, Sadoff S (2016) The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(4):183–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linardi S, McConnell MA (2011) No excuses for good behavior: Volunteering and the social environment. J. Public Econom. 95(5):445–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Pallais A (2017) Valuing alternative work arrangements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3722–3759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy R, Weinhardt F (2020) Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(6):2777–2826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owens D, Grossman Z, Fackler R (2014) The control premium: A preference for payoff autonomy. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 6(4):138–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S (2019) Socializing at work: Evidence from a field experiment with manufacturing workers. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(3):424–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao G (2019) Familiarity does not breed contempt: Generosity, discrimination, and diversity in Delhi schools. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):774–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosaz J, Slonim R, Villeval MC (2016) Quitting and peer effects at work. Labour Econom. 39:55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psych. Monographs 80(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Schupp J (2011) The social comparison scale: Testing the validity, reliability, and applicability of the IOWA-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM) on the German population. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 360, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Glätzle-Rützler D (2015) Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Sci. 61(10):2339–2354. Link, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Haigner S, Kocher MG (2010) Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1540–1566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tincani M (2018) Heterogeneous peer effects in the classroom. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Towler G (1986) From zero to one hundred: Coaction in a natural setting. Perceptual Motor Skills 62(2):377–378. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval MC (2020) Performance feedback and peer effects. GLO Discussion Paper No. 482, Global Labor Organization, Essen, Germany.Google Scholar
• Weinhardt M, Schupp J (2014) Multi-Itemskalen im SOEP-Jugendfragebogen. SOEP Survey Papers No. 234, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Wiswall M, Zafar B (2017) Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):457–507. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1965) Social facilitation. Sci. 149(3681):269–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Záraté RA (2021) Uncovering peer effects in social and academic skills. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar