Science and the Market for Technology

References

• Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M, Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse J-F (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A (1995) Licensing tacit knowledge: Intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 4(1):41–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2000) The market for technology in the chemical industry: Causes and consequences. Rev. Econom. Indust. 92(2):317–334.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Cohen W, Lee H (2018) Are ideas getting harder to find, or have firms just become too big? Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Arque-Castells P, Spulber DF (2017) The market for technology: Harnessing creative destruction. Working paper, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Arts S, Hou J, Gomez JC (2021) Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. Res. Policy 50(2):104144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Association of University Technology Managers (2015) Licensing activity survey, FY2015 (Association of University Technology Managers, Washington DC). https://autm.net/surveys-and-tools/surveys/licensing-survey/archived-licensing-surveys.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fons-Rosen C, Zivin JSG (2015) Does science advance one funeral at a time? NBER Working Paper No. 21788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Schankerman M (2009) University knowledge transfer: Private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. J. Law Econom. 52(1):111–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brannon HD, Wood WD, Rickards AR, Stephenson CJ (2007) Methods and compositions of a storable relatively lightweight proppant slurry for hydraulic fracturing and gravel packing applications. US Patent 7,971,643, filed December 5, 2007, and issued July 5, 2011.Google Scholar
• Bryan KA, Ozcan Y, Sampat B (2020) In-text patent citations: A user’s guide. Res. Policy 49(4):103946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnegie A (2006) The Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie and the Gospel of Wealth (Signet, New York).Google Scholar
• Cotropia CA, Lemley MA, Sampat B (2013) Do applicant patent citations matter? Res. Policy 42(4):844–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JC, Hoang VL, Subramanian K (2003) Oil and gas recovery from subterranean formations. US Patent 7,012,044, filed September 5, 2003, and issued March 14, 2006.Google Scholar
• Dernis H, Khan M (2004) Triadic patent families methodology. OECD Science, Technology and Industry working papers no. 2004/02, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Figueroa N, Serrano CJ (2019) Patent trading flows of small and large firms. Res. Policy 48(7):1601–1616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Greene H, Li G, Marx M, Yao D (2019) Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science 364(6446):1139–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M (2014) Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):317–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M (2018) Patent rights, innovation, and firm exit. RAND J. Econom. 49(1):64–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M, Serrano CJ (2013) Trading and enforcing patent rights. RAND J. Econom. 44(2):275–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S (2008) The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: Evidence from patent grant delays. Management Sci. 54(5):982–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao J, Turaga D, Vu LH, Xiao H (2016) Network security apparatus and method of detecting malicious behavior in computer networks via cost-sensitive and connectivity constrained classification. US Patent 10,305,921, filed April 28, 2016, and issued May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Marco AC, Myers AF (2018) Patent transactions in the marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO patent assignment data set. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(3):343–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haynes W (1945) American Chemical Industry: The World War I Period: 1912–1922, vol. 3 (Van Nostrand, New York).Google Scholar
• Hogan JP, Banks RL (1956) Solid polymers of olefins and production of such polymers. US Patent 4,376,851, filed January 11, 1956, and issued March 15, 1983.Google Scholar
• Hogan JP, Banks RL (1958) Polymers and production thereof. US Patent 2,825,721, filed March 26, 1956, and issued March 4, 1958.Google Scholar
• Hounshell D, Smith JKJ (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S (1994) Rheology of aqueous gels. Unpublished PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn JM (2016) Property rights and frictions in the sale of patents. Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
• Lai R, D’Amour A, Yu A, Sun Y, Fleming L (2011) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010) (Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1987(3):783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma S, Tong JT, Wang W (2021) Bankrupt innovative firms. NBER Working Paper No. 28856, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Manadhata PK, Yadav S, Rao P, Horne W (2014) Detecting malicious domains via graph inference. Kutyłowski M, Vaidya J, eds. Eur. Symp. Res. Comput. Security (Springer, London), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1980) Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(5):863–873.Google Scholar
• Marco AD, Scellato G, Ughetto E, Caviggioli F (2017) Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions. Res. Policy 46(9):1644–1654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marco AC, Myers AF, Graham SJ, D’Agostino PA, Apple K (2015) The USPTO Patent Assignment Data set: Descriptions and analysis. USPTO Economic working paper no. 2015-2, Office of Chief Economist, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMillan FM (1979) The Chain Straighteners: Fruitful Innovation: The Discovery of Linear and Stereoregular Synthetic Polymers(Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Merges RP, Nelson RR (1990) On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Rev. 90(4):839–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R (2017) Incubation of an industry: Heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strategic Management J. 38(3):566–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nakamura S (1992) Crystal growth method for gallium nitride-based compound semiconductor, US Patent 5,290,393, filed January 28, 1992, and issued March 1, 1994.Google Scholar
• Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D (1997) The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Res. Policy 26(3):317–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natta G, Pino P, Mazzanti G (1957) Isotactic polypropylene. US Patent 3,112,300, filed December 9, 1957, and issued November 26, 1963.Google Scholar
• Natta G, Paolo C, Italo P, Mario P, Mario P (1960) Polypropylene having syndiotactic structure. US Patent 3,258,455, filed June 6, 1960, and issued June 28, 1966.Google Scholar
• Natta G, Pino P, Corradini P, Danusso F, Mantica E, Mazzanti G, Moraglio G (1955) Crystalline high polymers of α-olefins. J. Amer. Chemical Soc. 77(6):1708–1710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (2015) Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serrano CJ (2010) The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents. RAND J. Econom. 41(4):686–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serrano CJ (2018) Estimating the gains from trade in the market for patent rights. Internat. Econom. Rev. 59(4):1877–1904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver SF (1970) Acrylate copolymer microspheres. US Patent 3691140, filed March 9, 1970, and issued September 12, 1972.Google Scholar
• Thurgood L, Golladay MJ, Hill ST (2006) US Doctorates in the 20th Century (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veugelers R, Wang J (2019) Scientific novelty and technological impact. Res. Policy 48(6):1362–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Yampolskiy A, Blackin R, Heid A, Kassoumeh S (2020) Cybersecurity risk assessment on an industry basis. US Patent 10,848,517, filed July 17, 2020, and issued November 24, 2020.Google Scholar
• Ziedonis R (2004) Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. 50(6):804–820.Link, Google Scholar