Managing with Style? Microevidence on the Allocation of Managerial Attention

References

• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A, Luo H (2018) Slack time and innovation. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1056–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Andrews J, Smith DC (1996) In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):174–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M (1990) Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker V, Mueller G (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Sci. 48(6):782–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT (1955) The informant in quantitative research. Amer. J. Sociol. 60(4):339–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 13(1):40–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Gerard Sanders W (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Santos T (2021) Managerial style and attention. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):372–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hambrick D (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2005) Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad. Manage. Rev. 30(3):472–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon HH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis (University of Chicago, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Good LK, Page TJ Jr, Young CE (1996) Assessing hierarchical differences in job-related attitudes and turnover among retail managers. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 24(2):148–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H (2015) Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change 12(5):1051–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Cognition, capabilities and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. 51(4):672–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Klebanov MM, Sorensen M (2012) Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? J. Finance 67(3):973–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karau SJ, Kelly JR (1992) The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 28:542–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Angelmar R, Mehra A (2000) Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organ. Sci. 11(1):21–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy O (2005) The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. J. Organ. Behav. 26(7):797–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo D, Ghosh M, Lafontaine F (2011) The incentive and selection roles of sales force compensation contracts. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):781–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittal B (1994) An integrated framework for relating: Diverse consumer characteristics to supermarket couple redemption. J. Marketing Res. 31(4):533–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Sharif E (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Allen Lane Publishers, London).Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neely BH Jr, Lovelace JB, Cowen AP, Hiller NJ (2020) Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. J. Management 46(6):1029–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Adv. Strategic Management 22(18):39–61.Google Scholar
• Reina CS, Peterson SJ, Zhang Z (2017) Adverse effects of CEO family-to-work conflict on firm performance. Organ. Sci. 28(2):228–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Saris WE, Gallhofer IN (2014) Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrage M (2013) Just how valuable is Google’s “20% time”? Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 20), https://hbr.org/2013/08/just-how-valuable-is-googles-2-1.Google Scholar
• Schriber JB, Gutek BA (1987) Some time dimensions of work: Measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. J. Appl. Psych. 72(4):642–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah AK, Mullainathan S, Shafir E (2012) Some consequences of having too little. Science 338(6107):682–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. GreenbergerM, ed. Communications, Computers, and the Public Interest (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore), 37–72.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Chen G (2015) CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):31–65.Crossref, Google Scholar