Aligning Differences: Discursive Diversity and Team Performance

References

• Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2019) Team creativity, cognition, and cognitive style diversity. Management Sci. 65(4):1586–1599.Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D, Chong C-L (1996) Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:251–284.Google Scholar
• Ancona D, Chong C-L (1999) Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. Wageman R, ed. Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Groups in Context, vol. 2 (Elsevier Science/JAI Press, Bingley, UK), 33–48.Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor, New York).Google Scholar
• Brereton MF, Cannon DM, Mabogunje A, Leifer LJ (1996) Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. Christiaans H, Cross N, Dorst K, eds. Analyzing Design Activity (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 319–341.Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Boumgarden P (2010) Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. 21(3):609–624.Link, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Castellan NJ Jr, ed. Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ), 221–246.Google Scholar
• Carley KM (1997) Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 18(S1):533–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Halevi MY (2009) How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. Leadership Quart. 20(2):207–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cejka MA, Eagly AH (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(4):413–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple ED (1974) Culture and biological man: Explorations in behavioral anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 15:53–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Handron C, Hudson L (2013) The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69(1):58–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R (2014) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR, Todorova G (2011) Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):571–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Res. J. 18(3):391–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, West MA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1191–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Bernier C, Heckscher C, Mimno D (2018) Interaction ritual threads: Does IRC theory apply online? Weininger EB, Lareau A, Lizardo O, eds. Ritual, Emotion, Violence: Studies on the Micro-Sociology of Randall Collins (Routledge, New York), 99–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliasoph N, Lichterman P (2003) Culture in interaction. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):735–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleishman EA, Zaccaro SJ (1992) Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. Swezey RW, Salas E, eds. Teams: Their Training and Performance (Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT), 31–56.Google Scholar
• Foucault M (2002) Archaeology of Knowledge (Psychology Press, Hove, UK).Google Scholar
• Garg N, Schiebinger L, Jurafsky D, Zou J (2018) Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(16):E3635–E3644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Martin WT (1962) Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: International patterns. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(5):667–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psych. Rev. 102(1):4–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Neale MA (2001) Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Res. Organ. Behav. 23:379–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guerin B (1986) Mere presence effects in humans: A review. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 22(1):38–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (2011) Collaborative Intelligence: Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Harkins SG (1987) Social loafing and social facilitation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 23(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser OP, Gino F, Norton MI (2018) Budging beliefs, nudging behaviour. Mind Soc. 17(1-2):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healey MP, Vuori T, Hodgkinson GP (2015) When teams agree while disagreeing: Reflexion and reflection in shared cognition. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):399–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, George G, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2008) Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. J. Management Stud. 45(5)982–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Karau SJ (1993) Entrainment of creativity in small groups. Small Group Res. 24(2):179–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, McGrath JE (1985) Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 49(2):395–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly J, Futoran GC, McGrath JE (1990) Capacity and capability: Seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates. Small Group Res. 21(3):283–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. 20(5):445–465.Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina K, Bruegger U (2002) Global microstructures: The virtual societies of financial markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(4):905–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski AC, Taddy M, Evans JA (2019) The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(5):905–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (2010) In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lewis D (2002) Convention: A Philosophical Study (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang D, Moreland R, Argote L (1995) Group vs. individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Res. 22(2):147–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Kelly JR (1986) Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Kelly JR, Machatka DE (1984) The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. Appl. Soc. Psych. Annu. 5:21–44.Google Scholar
• Mihalache OR, Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2014) Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: A moderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 8(2):128–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Burges CJC, Bottou L, Welling M, Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26. (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3111–3119.Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Burke LM, Glick WH (1998) Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management J. 19(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):402–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Ferzandi L, Hamilton K (2010) Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. J. Management 36(4):876–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. Nye JL, Brower AM, eds. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R, Argote L, Krishnan R (1998) Training people to work in groups. Tindale R, Heath L, eds. Theory and Research on Small Groups (Plenum Press, New York), 37–60.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page SE (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies, new ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prince C, Salas E (1993) Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, eds. Cockpit Resource Management (Academic Press, San Diego), 337–366.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Miron-Spektor E, Argote L (2016) Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1108–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid FJM, Reed S (2000) Cognitive entrainment in engineering design teams. Small Group Res. 31(3):354–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Mors ML (2014) A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1860–1877.Link, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) Social information-processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):224–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroeder J, Kardas M, Epley N (2017) The humanizing voice: Speech reveals, and text conceals, a more thoughtful mind in the midst of disagreement. Psych. Sci. 28(12):1745–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K (1997) SCRUM development process. Sutherland J, Casanave C, Miller J, Patel P, Hollowell G, eds. Business Object Design and Implementation (Springer, London), 117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Harvey S, Peterson R (2016) A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):453–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Banaji MR (2011) Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64(3):1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• ten Brinke L, Liu CC, Keltner D, Srivastava SB (2016) Virtues, vices, and political influence in the US Senate. Psych. Sci. 27(1):85–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L, Fine GA (1999) Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(4):278–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38(4):8–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warner RM (1979) Periodic rhythms in conversational speech. Language Speech 22(4):381–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warner RM (1992) Cyclicity of vocal activity increases during conversation: Support for a nonlinear systems model of dyadic social interaction. Behav. Sci. 37(2):128–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior, Springer Series in Social Psychology (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Erber R, Raymond P (1991) Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(6):923–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (AddisonWesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar