Design of Electricity Demand-Response Programs

References

• AEE (2019) Maryland’s behavioral demand response program. Advanced Energy Economy (AEE). Accessed February 6, 2020, https://perma.cc/XVV2-QR7B.Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Bellos I (2016a) Servicizing in supply chains and environmental implications. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains, vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin), 109–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Bellos I (2016b) The potential of servicizing as a green business model. Management Sci. 63(5):1545–1562.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Yücel Ş (2021) Renewable energy sourcing. Swaminathan J, Deshpande V, eds. Responsible Business Operations, vol. 10 (Springer, Berlin), 211–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Atasu A, Ülkü S (2021) Leasing, modularity, and the circular economy. Management Sci. 67(11):6782–6802.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L (2019) OM forum—New opportunities for operations management research in sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):1–12.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Toktay B, Yücel Ş (2022) Non-ownership business models for solar energy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Toktay B, Thomas V (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Al-Gwaiz M, Chao X, Wu O (2016) Understanding how generation flexibility and renewable energy affect power market competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):114–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Iravani F, Yücel Ş (2021) Investment in wind energy: The role of subsidies. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Ameren (2019) Peak time rewards. Accessed December 4, 2019, https://perma.cc/7MHE-DUMJ.Google Scholar
• Astashkina E, Belavina E, Marinesi S (2019) The environmental impact of the advent of online grocery retailing. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Avci B, Girotra K, Netessine S (2015) Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: Adoption and environmental impact. Management Sci. 61(4):772–794.Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Lobel R, Yücel Ş (2020) Promoting solar panel investments: Feed-in-tariff vs. tax-rebate policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1148–1164.Link, Google Scholar
• Belavina E, Girotra K, Kabra A (2016) Online grocery retail: Revenue models and environmental impact. Management Sci. 63(6):1781–1799.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellos I, Ferguson M, Toktay B (2017) The car sharing economy: Interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):185–201.Link, Google Scholar
• BG&E (2019) Energy savings days. Baltimore Gas & Electric (BG&E). Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/7FJY-9RDL.Google Scholar
• Bushnell J, Hobbs B, Wolak F (2009) When it comes to demand response, is FERC its own worst enemy? Electr. J. 22(8):9–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Corbett C, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C, DeCroix G (2001) Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. 47(7):881–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C, DeCroix G, Ha A (2005) Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contracts and double moral hazard. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(3):653–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CPUC (2019) Demand response. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/J9Q4-DVZY.Google Scholar
• Dahlke S, McFarlane D (2015) Environmental benefits of demand response. Great Plains Institute. Accessed January 17, 2020, https://perma.cc/834J-ASSE.Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Lobel R (2015) Demand response in electricity markets: Voluntary and automated curtailment contracts. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• DP&LC (2019) Peak energy savings credit. Delmarva Power & Light Company (DP&LC). Accessed October 2, 2019, https://www.delmarva.com/WaysToSave/ForYourHome/Pages/MD/AboutPeakEnergySavingsCredit.aspx.Google Scholar
• Drake D (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign production cost advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Duke Energy (2022) Energywise home. Accessed January 15, 2022, https://perma.cc/XM2Y-JYMT.Google Scholar
• EDF (2014) What is demand response? Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Accessed March 1, 2019, https://perma.cc/U7PQ-N2LA.Google Scholar
• EIA (2011) Demand response can lower electric power load when needed. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/QG5J-4Z8G.Google Scholar
• EIA (2019a) 2018 utility bundled retail sales-residential. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Accessed February 6, 2020, https://perma.cc/RP6A-E5VR.Google Scholar
• EIA (2019b) Annual electric power industry report. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Accessed November 19, 2019, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861.Google Scholar
• EIA (2019c) Demand-side management programs save energy and reduce peak demand. Energy Information Agency (EIA). Accessed January 17, 2020, https://perma.cc/6F42-9ZUC.Google Scholar
• EnerNOC (2011) The demand response baseline. Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/PB4P-QJWM.Google Scholar
• FERC (2013) Measurement and verification for demand response. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/C248-DJ72.Google Scholar
• Gagne D, Settle E, Aznar A, Bracho R (2018) Demand response compensation methodologies: Case studies for Mexico. Accessed October 7, 2019, https://perma.cc/78MX-TKVX.Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Netessine S (2013) Om forum—business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):537–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Hurley D, Peterson P, Whited M (2013) Demand response as a power system resource. The Regulatory Assistance Project. Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/9URU-F2EH.Google Scholar
• ISO-NE (2019) 2018 annual markets report. Independent System Operator New England (ISO-NE). Accessed October 9, 2019, https://perma.cc/2LPY-AFWW.Google Scholar
• Kök G, Shang K, Yücel Ş (2018) Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1):131–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök G, Shang K, Yücel Ş (2020) Investments in renewable and conventional energy: The role of operational flexibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):925–941.Link, Google Scholar
• Maryland PSC (2019) The EmPOWER maryland energy efficiency act report of 2019. Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC). Accessed April 14, 2021, https://perma.cc/QBM9-GMLK.Google Scholar
• Muthulingam S, Corbett C, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.Link, Google Scholar
• PEPCO (2013) Pepco directed by pjm, regional grid operator, to extend energy wise rewards. The Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). Accessed October 6, 2019, https://perma.cc/8XRM-CBPC.Google Scholar
• PEPCO (2019a) About peak energy savings credit. The Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). Accessed October 2, 2019, https://www.pepco.com/WaysToSave/ForYourHome/Pages/MD/AboutPeakEnergySavingsCredit.aspx.Google Scholar
• PEPCO (2019b) Peak energy savings credit. The Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). Accessed October 2, 2019, https://www.pepco.com/WaysToSave/ForYourHome/Pages/MD/PeakEnergySavingsCredit.aspx.Google Scholar
• PEPCO (2019c) Peak energy savings credit, FAQs. The Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). Accessed October 2, 2019, https://www.pepco.com/WaysToSave/ForYourHome/Pages/MD/FAQs.aspx.Google Scholar
• PGE (2019) Peak time rebates. Portland General Electric (PGE). Accessed December 4, 2019, https://perma.cc/D4DL-JGJT.Google Scholar
• PJM (2014) Analysis of operational events and market impacts during the January 2014 cold weather events. Pennsylvania New Jersey Maryland Interconnection (PJM). Accessed October 5, 2019, https://perma.cc/QS5W-36RG.Google Scholar
• PJM (2017) Retail electricity consumer opportunities for demand response in PJM’s wholesale markets. Pennsylvania New Jersey Maryland Interconnection (PJM). Accessed October 5, 2019, https://perma.cc/2TYW-URKV.Google Scholar
• Potomac Economics (2019) 2018 state of the market report for the ERCOT electricity markets. Accessed October 9, 2019, https://perma.cc/Q9YT-76X6.Google Scholar
• SCE (2019) SCE smart energy program. Southern California Edison (SCE). Accessed November 17, 2019, https://perma.cc/6Y7V-LDL3.Google Scholar
• SDG&E (2019) AC saver. San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). Accessed November 17, 2019, https://perma.cc/W2FJ-LBNQ.Google Scholar
• Singh S, Scheller-Wolf A (2021) That’s not fair: Tariff structures for electricity markets with rooftop solar. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print January 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0930.Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Birge J (2019) Strategic commitment to a production schedule with uncertain supply and demand: Renewable energy in day-ahead electricity markets. Management Sci. 65(2):714–734.Link, Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Swaminathan JM (2021) Net-metered distributed renewable energy: A peril for utilities? Management Sci. 67(11):6716–6733.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiernan T (2019) ERCOT dealing with record demand, generator outages, high prices. Foster Report No. 3262. Accessed October 9, 2019, https://perma.cc/CN8F-T5SF.Google Scholar
• Webb E, Wu O, Cattani K (2019) Coordinating energy efficiency and incentive-based demand response. Working paper, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
• Wu O, Yücel Ş, Zhou Y (2021) Smart charging of electric vehicles: An innovative business model for utility firms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print November 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1019.Link, Google Scholar