The Price of Imposing Vertical Equity Through Asymmetric Outcome Constraints

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4287

References

  • Androutsopoulos KN, Madas MA (2019) Being fair or efficient? A fairness-driven modeling extension to the strategic airport slot scheduling problem. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 130:37–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ares JN, De Vries H, Huisman D (2016) A column generation approach for locating roadside clinics in Africa based on effectiveness and equity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254(3):1002–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C, Bertsimas D, Caramanis C, Fearing D (2012) Equitable and efficient coordination in traffic flow management. Transportation Sci. 46(2):262–280.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Gupta S (2015) Fairness and collaboration in network air traffic flow management: An optimization approach. Transportation Sci. 50(1):57–76.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2013) Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation. Oper. Res. 61(1):73–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borndörfer R, Reuther M, Schlechte T, Schulz C, Swarat E, Weider S (2015) Duty rostering in public transport-facing preferences, fairness, and fatigue. Conf. Adv. Systems Public Transport. http://www.rotterdam2015.caspt.org/proceedings/paper118.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Breugem T, Dollevoet T, Huisman D (2021) Is equality always desirable? Analyzing the trade-off between fairness and attractiveness in crew rostering, Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.4005.Google Scholar
  • Camelo S, Ciocan D, Iancu D, Warnes X, Zoumpoulis S (2021) Quantifying the benefits of targeting for pandemic response. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Caragiannis I, Kaklamanis C, Kanellopoulos P, Kyropoulou M (2012) The efficiency of fair division. Theory Comput. Systems 50(4):589–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickerson JP, Procaccia AD, Sandholm T (2014) Price of fairness in kidney exchange. AAMAS’14 Proc. 2014 Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Systems (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 1013–1020.Google Scholar
  • Dickerson JP, Procaccia AD, Sandholm T (2019) Failure-aware kidney exchange. Management Sci. 65(4):1768–1791.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhandler O, Tzur M (2019) The humanitarian pickup and distribution problem. Oper. Res. 67(1):10–32.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hooker JN, Williams HP (2012) Combining equity and utilitarianism in a mathematical programming model. Management Sci. 58(9):1682–1693.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacquillat A, Vaze V (2018) Interairline equity in airport scheduling interventions. Transportation Sci. 52(4):941–964.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: Interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45(7):1623–1630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43(3):513–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karsu Ö, Morton A (2015) Inequity averse optimization in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245(2):343–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh MT, Schilling DA (1994) Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin S, Ouelhadj D, Smet P, Vanden Berghe G, ÖZcan E (2013) Cooperative search for fair nurse rosters. Expert Systems Appl. 40(16):6674–6683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • McCoy J, Lee H (2014) Using fairness models to improve equity in health delivery fleet management. Production Oper. Management 23(6):965–977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mo J, Walrand J (2000) Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 8(5):556–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishi T, Sugiyama T, Inuiguchi M (2014) Two-level decomposition algorithm for crew rostering problems with fair working condition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237(2):465–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarzinger M, Watson V, Arwidson P, Alla F, Luchini S (2021) COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: A survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. Lancet Public Health 6(4):e210–e221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yadav P (2010) Improving public health in developing countries through operations research. Cochran JJ, Cox LA, Keskinocak P, Kharoufeh JP, Smith JC, eds. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0401.Google Scholar
  • Zografos KG, Jiang Y (2019) A bi-objective efficiency-fairness model for scheduling slots at congested airports. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 102:336–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.