Privacy Choice During Crisis
Published Online:25 Sep 2025https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00017
References
- (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy 3(1):26–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Lit. 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Choice architecture, framing, and cascaded privacy choices. Management Sci. 65(5):2267–2290.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2016) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective versus relative risk in privacy decision making. Preprint, submitted April 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765097.Google Scholar
- (2020) Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 26946, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Almagro M, Coven J, Gupta A, Orane-Hutchinson A (2023) Disparities in COVID-19 risk exposure: Evidence from geolocation data. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 102:103933.Google Scholar
- (2020) Effect of Social Distancing Measures in the New York City Metropolitan Area (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2021) Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):862–879.Google Scholar
- (1987) How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):163.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Frontier culture: The roots and persistence of “rugged individualism” in the United States. Econometrica 88(6):2329–2368.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) “Rugged individualism” and collective (in) action during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Public Econom. 195:104357.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Rationing social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: Transmission risk and social benefits of US locations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(26):14642–14644.Google Scholar
- (2022) Individualism during crises. Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):368–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 37(3):466–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Mechanism design for “free” but “no free disposal” services: The economics of personalization under privacy concerns. Management Sci. 56(10):1766–1780.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) That could have been me: Director deaths, CEO mortality salience, and corporate prosocial behavior. Management Sci. 66(7):3142–3161.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Social distancing, internet access and inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 26982, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) From terror to joy: Automatic tuning to positive affective information following mortality salience. Psych. Sci. 18(11):984–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):639–655.Link, Google Scholar
- (1972) Disasters and charity: Some aspects of cooperative economic behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):580–590.Google Scholar
- (2009) Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Brit. J. Soc. Psych. 48(3):487–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A little piece of me: When mortality reminders lead to giving to others. J. Consumer Res. 47(3):431–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Social identity theory. Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2 (Sage Publications Ltd, London), 379–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Heterogeneous actions, beliefs, constraints and risk tolerance during the COVID-19 pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 27211, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2005) Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die: Effects of mortality salience and self-esteem on self-regulation in consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):65–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Fear of death and the judgment of social transgressions: A multidimensional test of terror management theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(2):369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Why prosocial referral incentives work: The interplay of reputational benefits and action costs. J. Marketing Res. 57(1):156–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Ghose A, Li B, Liu S (2019) Mobile targeting using customer trajectory patterns. Management Sci. 65(11):5027–5049.Google Scholar
- (2015) Privacy and marketing externalities: Evidence from Do Not Call. Management Sci. 61(12):2982–3000.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):349–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The use of mobile phone data to inform analysis of COVID-19 pandemic epidemiology. Nat. Commun. 11(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Does social distancing matter? University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2020-26, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (2012) The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-Being (Psychology Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Research note—Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Consumer privacy choice in online advertising: Who opts out and at what cost to industry? Marketing Sci. 39(1):33–51.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Managing consumer privacy concerns in personalization: A strategic analysis of privacy protection. MIS Quart. 35(2):423–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. 32(4):616–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Macha M, Foutz NZ, Li B, Ghose A (2023) Personalized privacy preservation in consumer mobile trajectories. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):249–271.Google Scholar
- (2025) Perils of location tracking? Personalized and interpretable privacy preservation in consumer mobile trajectories. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):249–271.Google Scholar
- (2020) Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle. Sci. Adv. 6(23):eabc0764.Google Scholar
- (2007) Citizen communications in crisis: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 727–736.Google Scholar
- (2015) Thirty years of terror management theory: From genesis to revelation. Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 52 (Academic Press, Amsterdam), 1–70.Google Scholar
- (2020) Mobility patterns and income distribution in times of crisis: U.S. urban centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint, submitted April 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572324.Google Scholar
- (2005) Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. J. Risk Res. 8(2):145–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Sensor data and behavioral tracking: Does usage-based auto insurance benefit drivers? Marketing Sci. 38(1):21–43.Link, Google Scholar
- Sun C, Adamopoulos P, Ghose A, Luo X (2022) Predicting stages in omnichannel path to purchase: A deep learning model. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):429–445.Google Scholar
- (2004) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Hatch MJ, Schultz M, eds. Organizational Identity: A Reader (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 56–65.Google Scholar
- (2014) Representation in municipal government. Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108(3):605–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Individualism & Collectivism (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
- (2013) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) The significance of the frontier in American history (1893). Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner: ‘The Significance of the Frontier in American History’ and Other Essays (Henry Holt & Company, New York), 31–60.Google Scholar
- (1987) Collective Behavior, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2016) Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. J. Marketing 80(6):97–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Intracommunity gifting at the intersection of contemporary moral and market economies. J. Consumer Res. 39(1):74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with covid-19 shelter-in-place protocols. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2020-40, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2011) The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems 51(1):42–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Yang Z, Krishnan R, Li B (2024) The interplay between individual mobility, health risk, and economic choice: A holistic model for COVID-19 policy intervention. INFORMS J. Data Sci. 3(1):6–27.Google Scholar
- Zhang Y, Li B, Qian S (2023) Ridesharing and digital resilience for urban anomalies: Evidence from the New York City taxi market. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1775–1790.Google Scholar

