Behavioral Microfoundations of New Practice Adoption: The Effects of Rewards, Training and Population Dynamics

References

• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):487–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1997) Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota production system: A case study of Nummi’s 1993 model introduction. ILR Rev. 50(3):416–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2005) How much do we care about absolute vs. relative income and consumption? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 56(3):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O (2018) Social incentives in organizations. Annu. Rev. Econom. 10:439–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avcı B, Loutfi Z, Mihm J, Belavina E, Keck S (2014) Comparison as incentive: Newsvendor decisions in a social context. Production Oper. Management 23(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin M, Mussweiler T (2018) The culture of social comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(39):E9067–E9074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bault N, Joffily M, Rustichini A, Coricelli G (2011) Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(38):16044–16049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) Culture and the Evolutionary Process (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion vs. structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(6):1287–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D (2019) The truth about behavioral change. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 60(2):1–8.Google Scholar
• Chamley CP (2004) Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Kavadias S, Hutchison-Krupat J (2009) Innovation processes. Technical report, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee RA, Eliashberg J (1990) The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach. Management Sci. 36(9):1057–1079.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho S-H, McCardle KF (2009) The adoption of multiple dependent technologies. Oper. Res. 57(1):157–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Chun J, Brockner J, De Cremer D (2018) People don’t want to be compared with others in performance reviews. They want to be compared with themselves. Harvard Bus. Rev, 5.Google Scholar
• Corcoran K, Crusius J, Mussweiler T (2011) Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. Chadee D, ed. Theories in Social Psychology (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ), 119–139.Google Scholar
• Coricelli G, Rustichini A (2010) Counterfactual thinking and emotions: Regret and envy learning. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 365(1538):241–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelius PB, Gokpinar B, Sting FJ (2021) Sparking manufacturing innovation: How temporary interplant assignments increase employee idea values. Management Sci. 67(4):2231–2250.Link, Google Scholar
• Crama P, Sting FJ, Wu Y (2019) Encouraging help across projects. Management Sci. 65(3):1408–1429.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm (Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dessart FJ, Barreiro-Hurlé J, van Bavel R (2019) Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 46(3):417–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Gaba V (2012) Venturing into new territory: Career experiences of corporate venture capital managers and practice variation. Acad. Management J. 55(3):563–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dvash J, Gilam G, Ben-Ze’ev A, Hendler T, Shamay-Tsoory SG (2010) The envious brain: The neural basis of social comparison. Human Brain Mapping 31(11):1741–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckles D, Kizilcec RF, Bakshy E (2016) Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7316–7322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D (1993) Rules of thumb for social learning. J. Polit. Econom. 101(4):612–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feylessoufi A (2020) Adoption of innovations: Modelling the interplay of behavioural biases, incentives and network structure. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald G, Russo NL (2005) The turnaround of the London Ambulance Service Computer-Aided Despatch system (LASCAD). Eur. J. Inform. Systems 14(3):244–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Khan B (2003) Adoption of new technology. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hannan TH, McDowell JM (1984) The determinants of technology adoption: The case of the banking firm. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):328–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchison-Krupat J, Kavadias S (2015) Strategic resource allocation: Top-down, bottom-up, and the value of strategic buckets. Management Sci. 61(2):391–412.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobs BW, Swink M, Linderman K (2015) Performance effects of early and late Six Sigma adoptions. J. Oper. Management 36:244–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y (1994) Learning by doing and the choice of technology. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kramer T, Yucel-Aybat O, Lau-Gesk L (2011) The effect of schadenfreude on choice of conventional vs. unconventional options. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):140–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahno AM, Serra-Garcia M (2015) Peer effects in risk taking: Envy or conformity? J. Risk Uncertainty 50(1):73–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Huberman BA (1999) A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Sci. 45(2):160–177.Link, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Wu Y (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11):1835–1849.Link, Google Scholar
• Long X, Nasiry J (2020) Wage transparency and social comparison in sales force compensation. Management Sci. 66(11):5290–5315.Link, Google Scholar
• Ma T (2010) Coping with uncertainties in technological learning. Management Sci. 56(1):192–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1990) New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing 54(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCardle KF (1985) Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. 31(11):1372–1389.Link, Google Scholar
• Michel-Guillou E, Moser G (2006) Commitment of farmers to environmental protection: From social pressure to environmental conscience. J. Environ. Psycho 26(3):227–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Momot R, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) The use and value of social information in selective selling of exclusive products. Management Sci. 66(6):2610–2627.Link, Google Scholar
• Naumovska I, Gaba V, Greve H (2021) The diffusion of differences: A review and reorientation of 20 years of diffusion research. Acad. Management Ann. 15(2):377–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özkan-Seely GF, Gaimon C, Kavadias S (2015) Dynamic knowledge transfer and knowledge development for product and process design teams. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):177–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Peres R, Muller E, Mahajan V (2010) Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(2):91–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J. Econom. Lit. 36(1):11–46.Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2013) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1972) Factors affecting the diffusion of technology. Explorations Econom. Hist. 10(1):3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandholm WH (2010) Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schlag KH (1998) Why imitate, and if so, how?: A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. J. Econom. Theory 78(1):130–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E (2008) The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Management Sci. 54(5):863–877.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Ulu C (2012) Technology adoption with uncertain future costs and quality. Oper. Res. 60(2):262–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (2005) Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econom. Lit. 43(2):392–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2017) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2014) Realizing the need for rework: From task interdependence to social networks. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1312–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sting FJ, Mihm J, Loch CH, Clement J (2022) Decision allocation in collaborative search: The value of shared control between domain experts and non-experts. Preprint, submitted July 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826309.Google Scholar
• Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24(1):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D, Sull C, Chamberlain A (2019) Measuring culture in leading companies. MIT Sloan Management Rev.Google Scholar
• Vermeulen F (2018) A basic theory of inheritance: How bad practice prevails. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1603–1629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weibull JW (1997) Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar