Investor Logins and the Disposition Effect

References

• Agnew J, Balduzzi P, Sundén A (2003) Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):193–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2016) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
• An L, Engelberg J, Henriksson M, Wang B, Williams J (2024) The portfolio-driven disposition effect. Preprint, submitted January 19, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126997.Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim SS (2010) A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: Evidence from China, Korea, and the US. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 112(2):99–111.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2000) Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. J. Finance 55(2):773–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2013) The behavior of individual investors. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1533–1570.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Lee Y-T, Liu Y-J, Odean T (2007) Is the aggregate investor reluctant to realise losses? Evidence from Taiwan. Eur. Financial Management 13(3):423–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N (2012) A model of casino gambling. Management Sci. 58(1):35–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance 64(2):751–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2012) Realization utility. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David I, Hirshleifer D (2012) Are investors really reluctant to realize their losses? Trading responses to past returns and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2485–2532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bewley TF (1999) Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birru J (2015) Confusion of confusions: A test of the disposition effect and momentum. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(7):1849–1873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolte L, Raymond C (2023) Emotional inattention. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Memory and reference prices: An application to rental choice. AEA Papers Proc. 109:572–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bracha A, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G (2015) Relative pay and labor supply. J. Labor Econom. 33(2):297–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown GDA, Gardner J, Oswald AJ, Qian J (2008) Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being? Indust. Relations 47(3):355–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown P, Chappel N, da Silva Rosa R, Walter T (2006) The reach of the disposition effect: Large sample evidence across investor classes. Internat. Rev. Finance 6(1–2):43–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvet LE, Campbell JY, Sodini P (2009) Measuring the financial sophistication of households. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang TY, Solomon DH, Westerfield MM (2016) Looking for someone to blame: Delegation, cognitive dissonance, and the disposition effect. J. Finance 71(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng T-CF, Huang H-H, Lin T-C, Yang T-T, Zhu J-D (2022) Pure windfall gain and stock market participation: Evidence from administrative data. Preprint, submitted February 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3981321.Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins RL (1996) For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psych. Bull. 119(1):51–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pollet JM (2009) Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements. J. Finance 64(2):709–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Lindner A, Reizer B, Schmieder JF (2017) Reference-dependent job search: Evidence from Hungary. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1969–2018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Zhu N (2006) Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Sci. 52(5):726–740.Link, Google Scholar
• Dorn D, Huberman G (2005) Talk and action: What individual investors say and what they do. Rev. Finance 9(4):437–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus H (1913) Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Ann. Neuroscience 20(4):155–156.Google Scholar
• Feng L, Seasholes MS (2005) Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance 9(3):305–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A (2009) E-ztax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):969–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Rangel A (2014) Debiasing the disposition effect by reducing the saliency of information about a stock’s purchase price. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107(B):541–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Hartzmark SM, Solomon DH (2018) Rolling mental accounts. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(1):362–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Barberis N, Camerer C, Bossaerts P, Rangel A (2014) Using neural data to test a theory of investor behavior: An application to realization utility. J. Finance 69(2):907–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2018) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia and information suppression in competitive markets. Tremblay VJ, Schroeder E, Tremblay CH, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 40–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gherzi S, Egan D, Stewart N, Haisley E, Ayton P (2014) The meerkat effect: Personality and market returns affect investors’ portfolio monitoring behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107(B):512–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist DS, Sands EG (2016) Something to talk about: Social spillovers in movie consumption. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1339–1382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Updating the reference level: Experimental evidence. Zwick R, Rapoport A, eds. Experimental Business Research (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 263–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WN, Kumar A (2008) Equity portfolio diversification. Rev. Finance 12(3):433–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WN, Zhu N (2005) Rain or shine: Where is the weather effect? Eur. Financial Management 11(5):559–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WN, Kim D, Kumar A, Wang Q (2015) Weather-induced mood, institutional investors, and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(1):73–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Gurney N, Loewenstein G (2020) Information gaps for risk and ambiguity. Psych. Rev. 128(1):86–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) What makes investors trade? J. Finance 56(2):589–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie BG, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartzmark SM (2015) The worst, the best, ignoring all the rest: The rank effect and trading behavior. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(4):1024–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer RZ (2016) Peer pressure: Social interaction and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3177–3209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer R, Iliewa Z, Imas A, Weber M (2023) Dynamic inconsistency in risky choice: Evidence from the laboratory and field. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3600583.Google Scholar
• Henderson V (2012) Prospect theory, liquidation, and the disposition effect. Management Sci. 58(2):445–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Hens T, Vlcek M (2011) Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? J. Behav. Finance 12(3):141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homonoff TA (2018) Can small incentives have large effects? The impact of taxes vs. bonuses on disposable bag use. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(4):177–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2016) The realization effect: Risk-taking after realized vs. paper losses. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(8):2086–2109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingersoll JE, Jin LJ (2013) Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):723–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Fredrickson BL, Schreiber CA, Redelmeier DA (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psych. Sci. 4(6):401–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M (2010) Prospect theory and the disposition effect. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(3):791–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koop GJ, Johnson JG (2012) The use of multiple reference points in risky decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 25(1):49–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li JJ, Massa M, Zhang H, Zhang J (2019) Air pollution, behavioral bias, and the disposition effect in China. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):641–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes LL, Oden GC (1999) The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. J. Math. Psych. 43(2):286–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo C, Ravina E, Sammon M, Viceira LM (2020) Retail investors’ contrarian behavior around news and the momentum effect. Preprint, submitted April 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544949.Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markle A, Wu G, White R, Sackett A (2018) Goals as reference points in marathon running: A novel test of reference dependence. J. Risk Uncertainty 56(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell OS, Mottola GR, Utkus SP, Yamaguchi T (2008) The inattentive participant: Portfolio trading behavior in 401(k) plans. Preprint, submitted February 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1094834.Google Scholar
• Murdock BB (1962) The serial position effect of free recall. J. Experiment. Psych. 64(5):482–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordóñez LD, Connolly T, Coughlan R (2000) Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(3):329–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagel M (2018) A news-utility theory for inattention and delegation in portfolio choice. Econometrica 86(2):491–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quispe-Torreblanca E, Gathergood J, Loewenstein G, Stewart N (2022) Attention utility: Evidence from individual investors. Preprint, submitted September 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527082.Google Scholar
• Quispe-Torreblanca E, Hume D, Gathergood J, Loewenstein G, Stewart N (2023) At the top of the mind: Peak prices and the disposition effect. Preprint, submitted January 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3879102.Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Fallon AE (1987) A perspective on disgust. Psych. Rev. 94(1):23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seru A, Shumway T, Stoffman N (2010) Learning by trading. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(2):705–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shampanier K, Mazar N, Ariely D (2007) Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Sci. 26(6):742–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z, Venezia I (2001) Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors. J. Banking Finance 25(8):1573–1587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H, Statman M (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sicherman N, Loewenstein G, Seppi DJ, Utkus SP (2015) Financial attention. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):863–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan K, Kida T (1995) The effect of multiple reference points and prior gains and losses on managers’ risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 64(1):76–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tryon WW (1994) Expectation. Ramachandran VS, ed. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, vol. 2 (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA) 313–319.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Herpen E, Hieke S, van Trijp HC (2014) Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling. The influence of reference points. Appetite 72:138–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward G (2002) A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall. Memory Cognition 30:885–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M, Camerer CF (1998) The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 33(2):167–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu T (2018) Learning from the crowd: The feedback value of crowdfunding. Preprint, submitted August 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2637699.Google Scholar
• Yaniv G (1999) Tax compliance and advance tax payments: A prospect theory analysis. National Tax J. 52(4):753–764.Crossref, Google Scholar