The Effect of Computer Monitoring on Employees’ Productivity in Telecommuting Arrangements

References

• Abril D, Harwell D (2021) Keystroke tracking, screenshots, and facial recognition: The boss may be watching long after the pandemic ends. Washington Post (September 24), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/24/remote-work-from-home-surveillance/.Google Scholar
• Aiello JR, Svec CM (1993) Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(7):537–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baek IG (2023) The effect of telecommuting on information acquisition: Evidence from the U.S. Patent Office. Accounting Rev. 98(3):21–46.Google Scholar
• Baiman S (1990) Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting Organ. Soc. 15(4):341–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner SE, Sprinkle GB (2002) The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting Organ. Soc. 27(4 − 5):303–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan EW, Kachelmeier SJ, Zhang X (2021) Working longer but not harder: The effects of incentivizing inputs vs. outputs in a heterogeneous workforce. Accounting Rev. 96(5):133–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Foroughi C, Larson B (2021) Work from anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management J. 42(4):655–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark CS (2015) How a no-show patent examiner got paid $25,000 while golfing. Government Executive (August 26), https://www.govexec.com/management/2015/08/how-no-show-patent-examiner-got-paid-25000-while-golfing/119552/.Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Kortum S, Stern S (2002) Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. Working paper, Boston University, University of Minnesota, and Northwestern University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Du M (2023) Locked-in at home: The gender difference in analyst forecasts after the COVID-19 school closures. J. Accounting Econom. 76(1):101603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E (2002) Empirical methods. Accessed May 2021, http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/fichiers/enseig/ecoineg/articl/Duflo2002.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dutcher EG (2012) The effects of telecommuting on productivity: An experimental examination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(1):355–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkens DH, Wang Y, Young SM (2022) Gender inequality in reemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The interplay between remote work, referrals, and gender. Working paper, China Europe International Business School, National University of Singapore, and University of Southern California, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
• Farre-Mensa J, Hedge D, Ljungqvist A (2020) What is a patent worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “lottery.” J. Finance 75(2):639–682.Google Scholar
• Frakes MD, Wasserman MF (2017) Is the time allocated to review patent applications inducing examiners to grant invalid patents? Evidence from microlevel application data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(3):550–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frakes MD, Wasserman MF (2019) Empirical scholarship on the prosecution process at the PTO. Depoorter B, Menell P, Schwarz D, eds. Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 2 (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frakes MD, Wasserman MF (2020) Procrastination at the Patent Office? J. Public Econom. 183:104140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1524–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabner I (2014) Incentive system design in creativity-dependent firms. Accounting Rev. 89(5):1729–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabner I, Speckbacher G (2016) The cost of creativity: A control perspective. Accounting Organ. Soc. 48:31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R, Higgins C (1989) Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service. National Productivity Rev. 8(2):101–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith TL (1993) Teaching big brother to be a team player: Computer monitoring and quality. Acad. Management Perspect. 7(1):73–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO, Howard MJ (2009) Unit-level voluntary turnover rates and customer service quality: Implications of group cohesiveness, newcomer concentration, and size. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):1068–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hecht G, Tafkov I, Towry KL (2012) Performance spillover in a multitask environment. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(2):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Ljungqvist A, Raj M (2022) Quick or broad patents? Evidence from U.S. startups. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(6):2705–2742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochmuth C (2014) What to make of USPTO’s telework troubles. NEXTGOV/FCW (August 25), https://www.nextgov.com/people/2014/08/what-to-make-of-usptos-telework-troubles/255564/.Google Scholar
• Hom PW, Lee TW, Shaw JD, Hausknecht JP (2017) One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):530–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hovorka-Mead AD, Ross WH Jr, Whipple T, Renchin MB (2002) Watching the detectives: Seasonal student employee reactions to electronic monitoring with and without advance notification. Personnel Psych. 55(2):329–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang Y, Erkens DH, Evans JH III (2009) Knowledge sharing and incentive design in production environments: Theory and evidence. Accounting Rev. 84(4):1145–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irving RH, Higgins CA, Safayeni FR (1986) Computerized performance monitoring systems: Use and abuse. Comm. ACM 29(8):794–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung S-M, Shin JY (2022) Social performance incentives in mission-driven firms. Management Sci. 68(10):7631–7657.Link, Google Scholar
• Kurland NB, Egan TD (1999) Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(4):500–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Langinier C, Lluis S (2021) Departure and promotion of U.S. patent examiners: Do patent characteristics matter? Contemporary Econom. Policy 39(2):416–434.Google Scholar
• Lemley MA, Sampat B (2012) Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(3):817–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merchant KA (1985) Controls in Business Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• National Academy of Public Administration (2015) The United States Patent and Trademark Office: A telework internal control and program review. Report, National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Olson MH (1982) New information technology and organizational culture. MIS Quart. 6(SI):71–92.Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piening EP, Baluch AM, Ridder H-G (2014) Mind the intended-implemented gap: Understanding employees’ perceptions of HRM. Human Resource Management 53(4):545–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rein L (2014) Patent office filters out worst telework abuses in report to its watchdog. Washington Post (August 10), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/patent-office-filters-out-worst-telework-abuses-in-report-to-watchdog/2014/08/10/cd5f442e-1e4d-11e4-82f9-2cd6fa8da5c4_story.html.Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Williams HL (2019) How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):203–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Slatis J (2020) How to help home-based workers maintain focus and prevent time theft. Forbes (November 9), https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2020/11/09/how-to-help-home-based-workers-maintain-focus-and-prevent-time-theft/?sh=19bb35021030.Google Scholar
• Smith MJ, Carayon P, Sanders KJ, Lim S-Y, Legrande D (1992) Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Appl. Ergonomics 23(1):17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprinkle GB, Williamson MG (2007) Experimental research in managerial accounting. Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD, eds. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Ltd., Oxford, UK), 415–444.Google Scholar
• Stanton JM (2000) Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. J. Bus. Psych. 15(1):129–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Meyer JP (1993) Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychol. 46(2):259–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce (2014) Abuse of USPTO’s Telework Program: Ensuring Oversight, Accountability, and Quality (Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce (2015) USPTO Needs to Strengthen Patent Quality Assurance Practices (Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce (2016) Analysis of Patent Examiners’ Time and Attendance (Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2013) Inspector General Referral No. 12-1196 H Re: Abuse of telework program at the USPTO. Report, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2021) Performance and accountability report. Report, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar