Salient Cues and Complexity

References

• Abeler J, Jäger S (2015) Complex tax incentives. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 7(3):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackert LF, Church BK, Qi L (2015) An experimental examination of portfolio choice. Rev. Finance 20(4):1427–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alós-Ferrer C, Fehr E, Netzer N (2021) Time will tell: Recovering preferences when choices are noisy. J. Political Econom. 129(6):1828–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azevedo EM, Gottlieb D (2012) Risk-neutral firms can extract unbounded profits from consumers with prospect theory preferences. J. Econom. Theory 147(3):1291–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltussen G, Post T (2011) Irrational diversification: An examination of the portfolio construction decision. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(5):1463–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banovetz J, Oprea R (2023) Complexity and procedural choice. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 15(2):384–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2066–2100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2001) Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava S, Loewenstein G, Sydnor J (2017) Choose to lose: Health plan choices from a menu with dominated option. Quart. J. Econom. 132(3):1319–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013a) Salience and asset prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):623–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013b) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Competition for attention. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):481–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2022) Salience. Annual Rev. Econom. 14:521–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Tabellini M, Yang D (2021) Issue salience and political stereotypes. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://www.dropbox.com/s/89w017ylutzdrb3/Stereotypes_and_Politics___201912-11.pdf?dl=0.Google Scholar
• Breunig C, Huck S, Schmidt T, Weizsäcker G (2021) The standard portfolio choice problem in Germany. Econom. J. (London) 131(638):2413–2446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cakici N, Zaremba A (2022) Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):689–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H (1994) Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty 8(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Dean M (2015) Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(7):2183–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernev A, Böckenholt U, Goodman J (2015) Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. J. Consumer Psych. 25(2):333–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosemans M, Frehen R (2021) Salience theory and stock prices: Empirical evidence. J. Financial Econom. 140(2):460–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007) Fatal attraction: Salience, naivete, and sophistication in experimental “hide-and-seek” games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1731–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dertwinkel-Kalt M, Frey J (2024) Optimal stopping in a dynamic salience model. Internat. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dertwinkel-Kalt M, Köster M (2020) Salience and skewness preferences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(5):2057–2107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dertwinkel-Kalt M, Ebert S, Köster M (2023) On correlated lotteries in economic applications. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 215:292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dertwinkel-Kalt M, Köster M, Peiseler F (2019) Attention-driven demand for bonus contracts. Eur. Econom. Rev. 115:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S (2015) On skewed risks in economic models and experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 112:85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Wiesen D (2011) Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Sci. 57(7):1334–1349.Link, Google Scholar
• Enke B, Graeber T, Oprea R (2023) Complexity and hyperbolic discounting. Accessed March 30, 2023, https://benjamin-enke.com/pdf/Complexity_time.pdf.Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Weizsäcker G (2016) Correlation neglect in portfolio choice: Laboratory evidence. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://www.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/en/Professorships/vwl/microeconomics/people/gweizsaecker/paper_gweizsaecker_ewmaintext.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):24–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Mormann MM (2018) The role of salience in choice under risk: An experimental investigation. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rppqC5EaGmUgH7RS9EE3LCR5_WugFvzX/view.Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Wang B (2020) The impact of salience on investor behavior: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Finance 75(1):229–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Lanzani G, Strack P (2023) Selective memory equilibrium. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4015313.Google Scholar
• Gabaix X (2014) A sparsity-based model of bounded rationality. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1661–1710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagnon-Bartsch T, Rabin M, Schwartzstein J (2023) Channeled attention and stable errors. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://gagnon-bartsch.com/files/ChanneledAttention2023.pdf.Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Harvey CR, Huang H (2009) Investor competence, trading frequency, and home bias. Management Sci. 55(7):1094–1106.Link, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2007) Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica 75(2):503–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y, Mayraz G (2024) Identifying rule-based rationality. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartzmark SM, Hirshman SD, Imas A (2021) Ownership, learning, and beliefs. Quart. J. Econom. 136(3):1665–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastings JS, Madrian BC, Skimmyhorn WL (2013) Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes. Annual Rev. Econom. 5(1):347–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herman LM, Bahrick HP (1966) Information encoding and decision time as variables in human choice behavior. J. Experiment. Psych. 71(5):718–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalaycı K, Serra-Garcia M (2016) Complexity and biases. Experiment. Econom. 19(1):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallir I, Sonsino D (2009) The neglect of correlation in allocation decisions. Southern Econom. J. 75(4):1045–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Szeidl A (2013) A model of focusing in economic choice. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):53–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunar MA, Watson DG, Tsetsos K, Chater N (2017) The influence of attention on value integration. Attention Perception Psychophysics 79(6):1615–1627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanzani G (2022) Correlation made simple: Applications to salience and regret theory. Quart. J. Econom. 137(2):959–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Camerer CF (2022) Predictable effects of visual salience in experimental decisions and games. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1849–1900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1958) A probabilistic theory of utility. Econometrica 26(2):193–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell O (2011) Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2014) The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Literature 52(1):5–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maćkowiak B, Matějka F, Wiederholt M (2023) Rational inattention: A review. J. Econom. Literature 61(1):226–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mao JC (1970) Survey of capital budgeting: Theory and practice. J. Finance 25(2):349–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matějka F, McKay A (2015) Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):272–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J. Bus. 53(3):13–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitton T, Vorkink K (2007) Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(4):1255–1288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz VG, Greenleaf EA, Johnson EJ (1998) Divide and prosper: Consumers’ reactions to partitioned prices. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):453–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnari S, Zápal J (2022) A model of focusing in political choice. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://snunnari.github.io/nz_focusinpolitics.pdf.Google Scholar
• Oprea R (2020) What makes a rule complex? Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(12):3913–3951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Primi C, Morsanyi K, Chiesi F, Donati MA, Hamilton J (2016) The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (IRT). J. Behav. Decision Making 29(5):453–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1988) Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). J. Econom. Theory 46(1):145–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schkade DA, Kahneman D (1998) Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psych. Sci. 9(5):340–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49(1–2):11–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sims CA (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taubinsky D, Rees-Jones A (2018) Attention variation and welfare: Theory and evidence from a tax salience experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(4):2462–2496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ungeheuer M, Weber M (2021) The perception of dependence, investment decisions, and stock prices. J. Finance 76(2):797–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valletti T, Veiga A (2021) Attention, recall and purchase: Experimental evidence on online news and advertising. Accessed March 30, 2024, https://www.cesifo.org/sites/default/files/events/2020/ed20_Valletti.pdf.Google Scholar
• van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R (2011) Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financial Econom. 101(2):449–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox NT (1993) Lottery choice: Incentives, complexity and decision time. Econom. J. (London) 103(421):1397–1417.Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS (2017) Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behav. 1(3):1–8.Google Scholar