Failures in Forecasting: An Experiment on Interpersonal Projection Bias

References

• Acland D, Levy M (2015) Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Sci. 61(1):146–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Bernheim D, Ockenfels A (2021) What motivates paternalism? An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):787–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Rabin M (2019) An experiment on time preference and misprediction in unpleasant tasks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(3):941–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badger G, Bickel W, Giordano L, Jacobs E, Loewenstein G, Marsch L (2007) Altered states: The impact of immediate craving on the valuation of current and future opioids. J. Health Econom. 26(5):865–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin D (2019) Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 69–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanco M, Engelmann D, Normann H (2011) A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games Econom. Behav. 72:321–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren A, Hauser D (2021) Learning with model misspecification: Characterization and robustness. Econometrica 89:3025–3077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan J (2020) My reference point, not yours. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 171:297–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busse B, Pope D, Pope J, Silva-Risso J (2015) The psychological effect of weather on car purchases. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):371–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J, Giuliano P, Guiso L (2016) The right amount of trust. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(5):1155–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Weber M (1989) The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. J. Polit. Econom. 97(5):1232–1254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang T, Huang W, Wang Y (2018) Something in the air: Pollution and the demand for health insurance. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(3):1609–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74:1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlin M, O’Donoghue T, Vogelsang T (2007) Projection bias in catalog orders. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1217–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronbach L (1955) Processes affecting scores on ‘understanding others’ and ‘assumed similarity’. Psych. Bull. 52:177–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R (1989) Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R (1990) The potential nonfalsity of the false consensus effect. Hogarth RM, ed. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 179–199.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018a) Predicting experimental results: Who knows what? J. Polit. Econom 126(6):2410–2456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018b) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2022) Stability of experimental results: Forecasts and evidence. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(3):889–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D, Vivalt E (2019) Predict science to improve science. Science 366(6464):428–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Torsvik G, Tjøtta S (2010) Testing guilt aversion. Games Econom. Behav. 68(1):95–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Strobel M (2000) The false consensus effect disappears if representative information and monetary incentives are given. Experiment. Econom. 3:241–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Strobel M (2012) Deconstruction and reconstruction of an anomaly. Games Econom. Behav. 76:678–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Caruso E (2009) Perspective taking: Misstepping into others’ shoes. Markman KD, Klein WMP, Suhr JA, eds. Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), 295–309.Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2012) Overestimating others’ willingness to pay. J. Consumer Res. 39(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frick M, Iijima R, Ishii Y (2020) Misinterpreting others and the fragility of social learning. Econometrica 88:2281–2328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagnon-Bartsch T (2016) Taste projection in models of social learning. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gagnon-Bartsch T, Pagnozzi M, Rosato A (2021) Projection of private values in auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111:3256–3298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Grosser J (2007) Welfare-reducing polls. Econom. Theory 31(1):51–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon RM (1986) Folk psychology as simulation. Mind Language 1(2):158–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick R, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz C, Allport F (1931) Students’ Attitudes (Craftsman Press, Syracuse, NY).Google Scholar
• Kaufmann M (2022) Projection bias in effort choices. Games Econom. Behav. 135:368–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger J, Clement R (1994) The truly false consensus effect—An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social-perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(4):596–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1121–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurt D, Inman J (2013) Mispredicting others’ valuations: Self-other difference in the context of endowment. J. Consumer Res. 40(1):78–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Adler D (1995) A bias in the prediction of tastes. Econom. J. 105(431):929–937.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1209–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madarász K (2012) Information projection: Model and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):961–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madarász K, Danz D, Wang S (2023) Projective thinking: Model, evidence, and applications. Working paper, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Marks G, Miller N (1987) 10 years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psych. Bull. 102(1):72–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• März O (2019) Comment on “Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance.” Management Sci. 65(5):2442–2443.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Read D, van Leeuwen B (1998) Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):189–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L, Greene D, House P (1977) The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 13:279–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R, Ockenfels A (1998) An experimental solidarity game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 34(4):517–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Hovland D (1961) Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Otis N, Abraham J, Markus H, Walton G (2020) Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(27):15546–15553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76:1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G (2003) Social projection of transient drive states. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(9):1159–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G (2005) Empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. Malle BF, Hodges SD, eds. Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others (Guilford Press, New York), 284–297.Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G, Dunning D (2003) Mispredicting the endowment effect: Underestimation of owners’ selling prices by buyers’ agents. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 51:351–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G, Dunning D, Nordgren L (2013) Changing places: A dual judgment model of empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 48 (Academic Press, San Diego), 118–171.Google Scholar
• Ziegler A, Romagnoli G, Offerman T (2022) Morals in multi-unit markets. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar