Industry-University Collaboration and Commercializing Chinese Corporate Innovation

References

• Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1992) Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(1):363–367.Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1994) R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76(2):336–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams JD (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J. Political Econom. 98(4):673–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK (2001) University‐to‐industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. Internat. J. Management Rev. 3(4):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appelbaum RP, Gebbie MA, Han X, Stocking G, Kay L (2016) Will China’s quest for indigenous innovation succeed? Some lessons from nanotechnology. Tech. Soc. 46:149–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021a) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021b) Matching patents to Compustat firms, 1980–2015: Dynamic reassignment, name changes, and ownership structures. Res. Policy 50(5):104217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Stephan PE (1996) Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):641–652.Google Scholar
• Babina T, He AX, Howell ST, Perlman ER, Staudt J (2020) The color of money: Federal vs. industry funding of university research. NBER Working Paper No. 28160, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Becker W, Dietz J (2004) R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Res. Policy 33(2):209–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B (2004) Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res. Policy 33(10):1477–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L (2013) Toward an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Res. Policy 42(1):117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt L, Van Biesebroeck J, Zhang Y (2014) Challenges of working with the Chinese NBS firm-level data. China Econom. Rev. 30:339–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehm S, Lundin N (2012) University–industry linkages and absorptive capacity: An empirical analysis of China’s manufacturing industry. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 21(8):837–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruneel J, D’Este P, Salter A (2010) Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Res. Policy 39(7):858–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2002) R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1169–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chari M, Steensma HK, Connaughton C, Heidl R (2022) The influence of patent assertion entities on inventor behavior. Strategic Management J. 43(8):1666–1690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K, Kenney M (2007) Universities/research institutes and regional innovation systems: The cases of Beijing and Shenzhen. World Development 35(6):1056–1074.Google Scholar
• Chen A, Patton D, Kenney M (2016) University technology transfer in China: A literature review and taxonomy. J. Tech. Transfer 41:891–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper LG (2000) Strategic marketing planning for radically new products. J. Marketing 64(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. 34(3):555–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1095–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Marco A, Scellato G, Ughetto E, Caviggioli F (2017) Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions. Res. Policy 46(9):1644–1654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eun JH, Lee K, Wu G (2006) Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Res. Policy 35(9):1329–1346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang J, He H, Li N (2020) China’s rising IQ (Innovation Quotient) and growth: Firm-level evidence. J. Development Econom. 147:102561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP (1994) Knowledge complementarity and innovation. Small Bus. Econom. 6:363–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Porter ME, Stern S (2002) The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31(6):899–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godin B, Gingras Y (2000) Impact of collaborative research on academic science. Sci. Public Policy 27(1):65–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. 80(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Marco AC, Myers AF (2018) Patent transactions in the marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO patent assignment data set. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(3):343–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):92–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan JC, Yam RC, Mok CK (2005) Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 17(3):339–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT (2003) Universities as research partners. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(2):485–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu PH, Li D (2018) Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(7):2553–2605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W (2008) Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Res. Policy 37(4):580–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Su YS (2013) The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data. Res. Policy 42(2):454–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Hsu PH, Zhao Q (2021) Rich on paper? Chinese firms’ academic publications, patents, and market value. Res. Policy 50(9):104319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu PH, Lee HH, Zhou T (2022) Patent thickets, stock returns, and conditional CAPM. Management Sci. 68(11):8343–8367.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang KGL, Geng X, Wang H (2017) Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China. Organ. Sci. 28(2):355–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1989a) Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Res. Policy 18(2):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1989b) Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5):957–970.Google Scholar
• Jia R, Li H (2021) Just above the exam cutoff score: Elite college admission and wages in China. J. Public Econom. 196:104371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kafouros M, Wang C, Piperopoulos P, Zhang M (2015) Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. Res. Policy 44(3):803–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Kongsted HC, Laursen K, Ejsing AK (2018) Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1935–1958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann A, Tödtling F (2001) Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Res. Policy 30(5):791–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelm KM, Narayanan VK, Pinches GE (1995) Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Acad. Management J. 38(3):770–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klevorick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Res. Policy 24(2):185–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Political Econom. 99(3):483–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1995) Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. 38(2):463–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim K (2009) The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Indust. Corporate Change 18(6):1249–1284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link AN, Rees J (1990) Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Bus. Econom. 2:25–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Jiang Y (2001) Technology transfer from higher education institutions to industry in China: Nature and implications. Technovation 21(3):175–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, White S (2001) Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Res. Policy 30(7):1091–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maietta OW (2015) Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Res. Policy 44(7):1341–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Res. Policy 20(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1998) Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Res. Policy 26(7–8):773–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E, Lee JY (1996) The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Res. Policy 25(7):1047–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matolcsy ZP, Wyatt A (2008) The association between technological conditions and the market value of equity. Accounting Rev. 83(2):479–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motohashi K (2005) University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Res. Policy 34(5):583–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motohashi K, Yun X (2007) China’s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages. Res. Policy 36(8):1251–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Ziedonis AA (2015) Markets vs. spillovers in outflows of university research. Res. Policy 44(1):50–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nasiriyar M, Nesta L, Dibiaggio L (2014) The moderating role of the complementary nature of technological resources in the diversification–performance relationship. Indust. Corporate Change 23(5):1357–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1986) Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):186–189.Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ (2009) Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Res. Policy 38(6):994–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K (1991) What makes basic research economically useful? Res. Policy 20(2):109–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peri G (2005) Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(2):308–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Salter A (2012) How to create productive partnerships with universities. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 53(4):53417.Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, et al. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy 41(155):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poyago‐Theotoky J, Beath J, Siegel DS (2002) Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 18(1):10–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prager DJ, Omenn GS (1980) Research, innovation, and university-industry linkages. Science 207(4429):379–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW (1999) Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 20(7):655–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Res. Policy 32(1):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simeth M, Cincera M (2016) Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Management Sci. 62(7):1970–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Zhang C, Kok RA (2020) The role of research outcome quality in the relationship between university research collaboration and technology transfer: Empirical results from China. Scientometrics 122:1003–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan J (2006) Growth of industry clusters and innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park. J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):827–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2006) Reflections on “profiting from innovation.” Res. Policy 35(8):1131–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2018) Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 47(8):1367–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tijssen RJ (2001) Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science–technology interactions and knowledge flows. Res. Policy 30(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Lee YN, Nagaoka S (2016) Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation. Res. Policy 45(8):1660–1671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Shapira P (2012) Partnering with universities: A good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? Small Bus. Econom. 38:197–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Huang J, Chen Y, Pan X, Chen J (2013) Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective. Scientometrics 97:207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu W (2010) Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. J. Tech. Transfer 35:203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu W, Zhou Y (2012) The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. J. Tech. Transfer 37:812–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Nielsen AP (2002) Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management J. 23(5):377–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Patton D, Kenney M (2013) Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Res. Policy 42(3):765–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou W (2012) Determinants and effects of research partnerships in China’s emerging market. Contemporary Econom. Policy 30(1):129–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (2001) Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products. J. Tech. Transfer 26(1):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (1998a) Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econom. Inquiry 36(1):65–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998b) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar