Information Ambiguity, Market Institutions, and Asset Prices: Experimental Evidence

References

• Ahn D, Choi S, Gale D, Kariv S (2014) Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quant. Econom. 5(2):195–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akiyama E, Hanaki N, Ishikawa R (2017) It is not just confusion! Strategic uncertainty in an experimental asset market. Econom. J. 127(605):F563–F580.Google Scholar
• Allen F, Morris S, Shin HS (2006) Beauty contests and iterated expectations in asset markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 19(3):719–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asparouhova E, Bossaerts P, Eguia J, Zame W (2015) Asset pricing and asymmetric reasoning. J. Political Econom. 123(1):66–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econom. Perspect. 11(1):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Wang X, Loewenstein G (1996) Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Weber M (2009) Hindsight bias, risk perception, and investment performance. Management Sci. 55(6):1018–1029.Link, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Hilton D, Mazurier K, Pouget S (2005) Judgmental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(2):287–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Tallon J-M (2018) Ambiguity preferences and portfolio choices: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 65(4):1486–1501.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleaney M, Humphrey SJ (2006) An experimental test of generalized ambiguity aversion using lottery pricing tasks. Theory Decision 60(2–3):257–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bossaerts P, Ghirardato P, Guarnaschelli S, Zame WR (2010) Ambiguity in asset markets: Theory and experiment. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boswijk HP, Hommes CH, Manzan S (2007) Behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 31(6):1938–1970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner M, Izhakian Y (2018) Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):503–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao HH, Wang T, Zhang HH (2005) Model uncertainty, limited market participation, and asset prices. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1219–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caskey JA (2008) Information in equity markets with ambiguity-averse investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(9):3595–3627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Epstein L (2002) Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70(4):1403–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Miao B, Zhong S (2017) Partial ambiguity. Econometrica 85(4):1239–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Kujal P, Porter D (2012) Reaction to public information in markets: How much does ambiguity matter? Econom. J. 123(569):699–737.Google Scholar
• De Filippis R, Guarino A, Jehiel P, Kitagawa T (2017) Updating ambiguous beliefs in a social learning experiment. Cemmap Working Paper No. CWP13/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, London.Google Scholar
• Deck C, Servátka M, Tucker S (2020) Designing call auction institutions to eliminate price bubbles: Is English Dutch the best? Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(2):225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diks C, Hommes C, Wang J (2019) Critical slowing down as an early warning signal for financial crises? Empirical Econom. 57(4):1201–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2015) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Mitchell OS, Peijnenburg K (2016) Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence. J. Financial Econom. 119(3):559–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Friedman D, Rabanal JP, Rud O (2022) Trade, voting, and ESG policies: Theory and evidence. Preprint, submitted December 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4306156.Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Hopkins E, Kornienko T, Ma M (2019) Information choice in a social learning experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 118:295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley D, O’Hara M, Yang L (2014) Opaque trading, disclosure, and asset prices: Implications for hedge fund regulation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(4):1190–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eil D, Rao JM (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(2):114–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enke B, Zimmermann F (2019) Correlation neglect in belief formation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):313–332.Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Halevy Y (2024) Hard-to-interpret signals. J. Europe. Econom. Assoc. 22(1):393–427.Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Schneider M (2008) Ambiguity, information quality, and asset pricing. J. Finance 63(1):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ert E, Trautmann ST (2014) Sampling experience reverses preferences for ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 49(1):31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Füllbrunn S, Rau HA, Weitzel U (2014) Does ambiguity aversion survive in experimental asset markets? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107:810–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallant AR, Jahan-Parvar MR, Liu H (2015) Measuring ambiguity aversion. FEDS Working Paper, The Fed–Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (2011) Portfolio choices and asset prices: The comparative statics of ambiguity aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1329–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2007) Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica 75(2):503–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinemann F, Nagel R, Ockenfels P (2004) The theory of global games on test: Experimental analysis of coordination games with public and private information. Econometrica 72(5):1583–1599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzmeister F, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Weitzel U, Zeisberger S (2020) What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and laypeople. Management Sci. 66(9):3977–4002.Link, Google Scholar
• Hommes C, Kopányi-Peuker A, Sonnemans J (2021) Bubbles, crashes and information contagion in large-group asset market experiments. Experiment. Econom. 24:414–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang RJ, Tzeng LY, Zhao L (2020) Fractional degree stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 66(10):4630–4647.Link, Google Scholar
• Illeditsch PK (2011) Ambiguous information, portfolio inertia, and excess volatility. J. Finance 66(6):2213–2247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen DJ, Li J, Qiu J, Weitzel U (2020) The disposition effect and underreaction to private information. J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 113:103856.Google Scholar
• Jeong D, Kim H, Park JY (2015) Does ambiguity matter? Estimating asset pricing models with a multiple-priors recursive utility. J. Financial Econom. 115(2):361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Hanany E (2007) Updating preferences with multiple priors. Theoret. Econom. 2(3):261–298.Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2009) Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):930–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG, Trautmann ST (2013) Selection into auctions for risky and ambiguous prospects. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):882–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher MG, Lahno A, Trautmann ST (2018) Ambiguity aversion is not universal. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101:268–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Markov S, Shu S (2023) Motivational optimism and short-term investment efficiency. Accounting Rev. 98(5):429–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang Y (2019) Learning from unknown information sources. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
• Machina MJ (1989) Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econom. Literature 27(4):1622–1668.Google Scholar
• Miao B, Zhong S (2012) An experimental study of attitude toward compound lottery. Preprint, submitted April 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2039216.Google Scholar
• Moreno OM, Rosokha Y (2016) Learning under compound risk vs. learning under ambiguity—An experiment. J. Risk Uncertainty 53(2–3):137–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noussair CN, Trautmann ST, Van de Kuilen G (2014) Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(1):325–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plous S (1993) The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Sarin RK, Weber M (1993) Effects of ambiguity in market experiments. Management Sci. 39(5):602–615.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith VL, Suchanek GL, Williams AW (1988) Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica 56(5):1119–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stöckl T, Huber J, Kirchler M (2010) Bubble measures in experimental asset markets. Experiment. Econom. 13(3):284–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, Van De Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, Vieider FM, Wakker PP (2008) Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known vs. unknown preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, Vieider FM, Wakker PP (2011) Preference reversals for ambiguity aversion. Management Sci. 57(7):1320–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzel U, Huber C, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Rose J (2020) Bubbles and financial professionals. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(6):2659–2696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang XF (2006) Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Finance 61(1):105–137.Crossref, Google Scholar