Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment

References

• Agresti A (2013) Categorical Data Analysis, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Carlana M, La Ferrara E, Pinotti P (2024) Revealing stereotypes: Evidence from immigrants in schools. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. Ashenfelter O, Rees A, eds. Discrimination in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–33.Google Scholar
• Ayres I, Siegelman P (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):304–321.Google Scholar
• Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (1995) Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(2):181–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Lane T, Nosenzo D (2018) On the social inappropriateness of discrimination. J. Public Econom. 164:153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee A, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Field Experiments (North Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Chugh D, Mullainathan S (2005) Implicit discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):94–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Kobrynowicz D (1997) Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3):544–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Lit. 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Van Geen A, Bazerman M (2015) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Hull P, Imas A (2022) Systemic discrimination: Theory and measurement. Preprint, submitted April 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4088566.Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Haggag K, Imas A, Pope DG (2023) Inaccurate statistical discrimination: An identification problem. Rev. Econom. Statist., ePub ahead of print September 27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacault MP, Grieder M (2019) How group identification distorts beliefs. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 164:63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campos-Mercade P, Mengel F (2023) Non-Bayesian statistical discrimination. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 31, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4824.Google Scholar
• Card D, DellaVigna S, Funk P, Iriberri N (2020) Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):269–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlana M (2019) Implicit stereotypes: Evidence from teachers’ gender bias. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1163–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charles KK, Guryan J (2011) Studying discrimination: Fundamental challenges and recent progress. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):479–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chauvin KP (2023) A misattribution theory of discrimination. Working paper, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coate S, Loury GC (1993) Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1220–1240.Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Collis M, Kulkarni L (2023) Stereotypes and belief updating. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021b) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Flikkema CB, Shurchkov O (2021c) Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions. Games Econom. Behav. 129:329–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Ugalde Araya P, Zafar B (2021a) A (dynamic) investigation of stereotypes, belief-updating, and behavior. NBER Working Paper No. 29382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Corno L, La Ferrara E, Burns J (2022) Interaction, stereotypes and performance: Evidence from South Africa. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(12):3848–3875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham T, de Quidt J (2023) Implicit preferences. Working paper, IIES Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Pearson AR (2017) Aversive racism and contemporary bias. Sibley C, Barlow F, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 267–294.Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Ufkes EG, Saguy T, Pearson AR (2016) Included but invisible? Subtle bias, common identity, and the darker side of “we.” Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 10(1):6–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkal N, Gangadharan L, Koh BH (2021) Discrimination in evaluation criteria: The role of beliefs versus outcomes. Preprint, submitted December 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3979701.Google Scholar
• Esponda I, Oprea R, Yuksel S (2023) Seeing what is representative. Quart. J. Econom. 138(4):2607–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyting M (2022) Why do we discriminate? The role of motivated reasoning. SAFE Working Paper No. 356. Preprint, submitted September 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4210315.Google Scholar
• Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2000) The aversive form of racism. Stangor C, ed. Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings (Psychology Press, London), 289–304.Google Scholar
• Glick P, Zion C, Nelson C (1988) What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):178–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glover D, Pallais A, Pariente W (2017) Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Evidence from French grocery stores. Quart. J. Econom. 132(3):1219–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(6):1464–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hengel E (2022) Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Econom. J. 132(648):2951–2991.Google Scholar
• Hilton JL, Von Hippel W (1996) Stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psych. 47(1):237–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson G, Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2002) Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(4):460–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson G, Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2010) The aversive form of racism. Chin JL, ed. The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. Volume 1. Racism in America (Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT), 119–135.Google Scholar
• Hübert R, Little AT (2023) A behavioural theory of discrimination in policing. Econom. J. 133(655):2828–2843.Google Scholar
• Isaksson S (2018) It takes two: Gender differences in group work. Working paper, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Jowell R, Prescott-Clarke P (1970) Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race 11(4):397–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, Park B (1993) Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovel J (1970) White Racism: A Psychohistory (Pantheon, New York).Google Scholar
• Kübler D, Schmid J, Stüber R (2018) Gender discrimination in hiring across occupations: A nationally-representative vignette study. Labour Econom. 55:215–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurdi B, Seitchik AE, Axt JR, Carroll TJ, Karapetyan A, Kaushik N, Tomezsko D, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (2019) Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. Amer. Psych. 74(5):569–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Skinner AL, Cooley E, Murrar S, Brauer M, Devos T, Calanchini J, et al. (2016) Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 145(8):1001–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane T (2016) Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 90:375–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepage L-P (2024) Experience-based discrimination. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• McIntyre S, Moberg DJ, Posner BZ (1980) Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Acad. Management J. 23(4):738–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chugh D (2015) What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1678–1712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumark D (2018) Experimental research on labor market discrimination. J. Econom. Lit. 56(3):799–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumark D, Bank RJ, Van Nort KD (1996) Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quart. J. Econom. 111(3):915–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman JM (1978) Discrimination in recruitment: An empirical analysis. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 32(1):15–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norton MI, Vandello JA, Darley JM (2004) Casuistry and social category bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(6):817–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716-1–aac4716-8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE (2015) Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(4):562–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Rackstraw E (2022) Bias-motivated updating in the labor market. Preprint, submitted December 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4278076.Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (1987) Testing for sexual discrimination in the labour market. Aust. Econom. Papers 26(49):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Econom. J. 112(483):F480–F518.Google Scholar
• Rooth D-O (2010) Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Econom. 17(3):523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarsons H (2019) Interpreting signals in the labor market: Evidence from medical referrals. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Sarsons H, Gërxhani K, Reuben E, Schram A (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. J. Political Econom. 129(1):101–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage RP Jr (1994) The paradox of nontransitive dice. Amer. Math. Monthly 101(5):429–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Gelfand M, Babcock L, Gettman H (2007) Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):600–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder ML, Kleck RE, Strenta A, Mentzer SJ (1979) Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(12):2297–2306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL (2005) Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psych. Sci. 16(6):474–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yinger J (1986) Measuring racial discrimination with fair housing audits: Caught in the act. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):881–893.Google Scholar
• Yu CW, Zhang YJ, Zuo SX (2021) Multiple switching and data quality in the multiple price list. Rev. Econom. Statist. 103(1):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar