Like Stars: How Firms Learn at Scientific Conferences

References

• Abadie A , Athey S , Imbens GW , Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M , Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akcigit U , Ates ST (2023) What happened to US business dynamism? J. Political Econom. 131(8):2059–2124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J , Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J , Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O , George G , Salter AJ (2013) Cui Bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):270–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P , Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Andrews D , Criscuolo C , Gal P (2015) Frontier firms, technology diffusion and public policy: Micro evidence from OECD countries. OECD Productivity Working Papers, No. 2, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Arora A , Gambardella A (1994) Evaluating technological information and utilizing it. Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 24(1):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A , Belenzon S , Dionisi B (2023) First-mover advantage and the private value of public science. Res. Policy 52(9):104867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A , Belenzon S , Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A , Belenzon S , Sheer L (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB , Stephan PE (1996) Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):641–652.Google Scholar
• Autor D , Dorn D , Hanson GH , Pisano G , Shu P (2020a) Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from US patents. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(3):357–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor D , Dorn D , Katz LF , Patterson C , Reenen JV (2020b) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Q. J. Econ. 135(2):645–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P , Stuart T , Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Bathelt H , Cohendet P (2014) The creation of knowledge: Local building, global accessing and economic development–toward an agenda. J. Econom. Geogr. 14(5):869–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S , Schankerman M (2013) Spreading the word: Geography, policy, and knowledge spillovers. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(3):884–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M , Marx M (2020) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard MA , Fernandez-Mateo I (2022) Standing on the shoulders of (male) giants: Gender inequality and the technological impact of scientific ideas. Preprint, submitted April 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4059813.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ , Brady T , Ganguli I , Gaule P , Guinan E , Hollenberg A , Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyack KW , Patek M , Ungar LH , Yoon P , Klavans R (2014) Classification of individual articles from all of science by research level. J. Informetrics 8(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S , Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Indust. Corp. Change 10(4):975–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S , Lissoni F (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. J. Econom. Geogr. 9(4):439–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E , Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campante F , Yanagizawa-Drott D (2017) Long-range growth: Economic development in the global network of air links. Quart. J. Econom. 133(3):1395–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C , Fons-Rosen C , Gaulé P (2020) How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Sci. 66(8):3340–3360.Link, Google Scholar
• Cetina KK (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , vol. 53.9 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 1689–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chai S , Freeman RB (2019) Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2138–2164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM , Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capcity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM , Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM , Nelson RR , Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cole JR , Cole S (1973) Social Stratification in Science (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crane D (1969) Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 34(3):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crane D (1974) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L , Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35(8):1243–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle J-m , David PA (2003) The allocation of software development resources in ‘open source’ production mode. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P , David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechenaux E , Goldfarb B , Shane S , Thursby M (2008) Appropriability and commercialization: Evidence from MIT inventions. Management Sci. 54(5):893–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L , Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(89):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L , Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J (2020) Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from apple’s worldwide developers conference. Management Sci. 66(10):4772–4787.Link, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C , Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. 33(2):233–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A , Giarratana MS , Roca E (2015) Walking a slippery line: Investments in social values and product longevity. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1750–1760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franceschet M (2010) The role of conference publications in CS. Commun. ACM 53(12):129–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M (2007) Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organ. Sci. 18(4):724–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M , Kogut B (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Haas MR , Park S (2010) To share or not to share? Professional norms, reference groups, and information withholding among life scientists. Organ. Sci. 21(4):873–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C (2011) Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study. Res. Policy 40(1):105–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C , Jiang L , Thursby J , Thursby M (2014) Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers. Res. Policy 43(3):465–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen TT , Pedersen BD (2018) The impact of academic events—A literature review. Res. Eval. 27(4):358–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann P , Henkel J (2020) The rise of corporate science in AI: Data as a strategic resource. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(3):359–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauss K (2021) What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany. Res. Eval. 30(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks D (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Indust. Corp. Change 4(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB , Trajtenberg M , Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econ. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knaus J , Palzenberger M (2018) PARMA. A full text search based method for matching non-patent literature citations with scientific reference databases. A pilot study. Technical Report by the Max Planck Digital Library, Big Data Analytics Group, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Koffi M , Marx M (2022) Cassatts in the Attic. NBER Working Paper No. 31316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lane JN , Ganguli I , Gaule P , Guinan E , Lakhani KR (2021) Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production? Strategic Manage. J. 42(6):1215–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K , Salter AJ (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Manage. J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK , Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Lopez de Leon FL , McQuillin B (2020) The role of conferences on the pathway to academic impact. J. Hum. Resour. 55(1):164–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskell P (2014) Accessing remote knowledge-the roles of trade fairs, pipelines, crowdsourcing and listening posts. J. Econom. Geogr. 14(5):883–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2011) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A , Stern S (2009) Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of open science. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(3):449–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97(3):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A , Perlis AJ , Simon HA (1967) Computer science. Science 157(3795):1373–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M , Salandra R , Tartari V , McKelvey M , Hughes A (2021) Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Res. Policy 50(1):104114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poege F , Harhoff D , Gaessler F , Baruffaldi S (2019) Science quality and the value of inventions. Sci. Adv. 5(12):eaay7323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F , Theeke M (2012) Getting competition down to a science: The effects of technological competition on firms’ scientific publications. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1135–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Powell WW , Koput KW , Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP , Williamson IO , Petkova AP , Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M , Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnitzer M , Watzinger M (2019) Standing on the shoulders of science. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP1376, CEPR Press, Paris & London.Google Scholar
• Simeth M , Cincera M (2016) Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Management Sci. 62(7):1970–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Simeth M , Raffo JD (2013) What makes companies pursue an Open Science strategy? Res. Policy 42(9):1531–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J , Marx M (2013) Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Sci. 59(9):2056–2078.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organ. 12(1):62–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (1996) The economics of science. J. Econom. Lit. 34(3):1199–1235.Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Tartari V , Salter A (2015) The engagement gap: Exploring gender differences in University – Industry collaboration activities. Res. Policy 44(6):1176–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tartari V , Perkmann M , Salter A (2014) In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Res. Policy 43(7):1189–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verluise C , De Rassenfosse G (2021) patCit. https://github.com/cverluise/PatCit.Google Scholar
• Vlasov SA , Bahlmann MD , Knoben J (2016) A study of how diversity in conference participation relates to SMEs’ innovative performance. J. Econom. Geography 17(1):191–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner S , Hoisl K , Thoma G (2014) Overcoming localization of knowledge - The role of professional service firms. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1671–1688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM , Fleming L (2009) Scanning the commons? Evidence on the benefits to startups participating in open standards development. Management Sci. 55(2):210–223.Link, Google Scholar
• ZEW (Centre for European Economic Research) (2018) Results of CIS 2016 for Germany. Technical report, ZEW, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG , Darby MR , Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG , Darby MR , Brewer MB (2008) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar