Project Networks and Reallocation Externalities

References

• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrot J-N, Sauvagnat J (2016) Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks. Quart. J. Econom. 131(3):1543–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Hwang W (2024) Managerial mental accounting and downstream project decisions. Management Sci. 70(12):8612–8630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellamy MA, Ghosh S, Hora M (2014) The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. J. Oper. Management 32(6):357–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordat C, McCullouch BG, Labi S, Sinha KC (2004) An analysis of cost overruns and time delays of INDOT projects. Report, Joint Transportation Research Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvo E, Cui R, Serpa JC (2019) Oversight and efficiency in public projects: A regression discontinuity analysis. Management Sci. 65(12):5651–5675.Link, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Mariniello M (2014) Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. J. Public Econom. 109:76–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Guglielmo A, Spagnolo G (2018) The effect of discretion on procurement performance. Management Sci. 64(2):715–738.Link, Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2006) From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right. Project Management J. 37(3):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2009) Optimism and misrepresentation in early project development. Williams TM, Samset K, Sunnevåg KJ, eds. Making Essential Choices with Scant Information (Palgrave Macmillan UK, London), 147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M (2011) Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 173(7):761–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2007) Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. 53(9):1452–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Imbens GW (2013) Social networks and the identification of peer effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(3):253–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Sivaramakrishnan K (2008) On vendor preferences for contract types in offshore software development: The case of fixed price vs. time and materials contracts. Inform. Systems Res. 19(2):202–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y (2014) New York City Department of Parks and Recreation. University of Virginia Darden School of Business Case QA-0815, Darden Business Publishing, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y (2020) Use data to revolutionize project planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February 26), https://hbr.org/2020/02/use-data-to-revolutionize-project-planning.Google Scholar
• Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15(3):199–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull TS (2019) Audit of cost increases and schedule delays for military construction projects at Joint Region Marianas. Report, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Jain N, Girotra K, Netessine S (2022) Recovering global supply chains from sourcing interruptions: The role of sourcing strategy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):846–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Jordan WC, Graves SC (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. 41(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Yu JV, Zheng Y (2023) Supply chain transparency and sustainability. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 17(2):82–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Kahneman D (2003) Delusions of success: How optimism undermines executives’ decisions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(7):56–63.Google Scholar
• McPhie NAG, Rose MM, Sapin BJ (2005) Contracting officer representatives: Managing the government’s technical experts to achieve positive contract outcomes. Report, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Office of Inspector General (2018) The Fort Bliss Hospital replacement military construction project. Audit Report DODIG-2018-125, Department of Defense, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Osadchiy N, Gaur V, Seshadri S (2016) Systematic risk in supply chain networks. Management Sci. 62(6):1755–1777.Link, Google Scholar
• Roy D, Mishra A, Sinha KK (2022) Taxing the taxpayers: An empirical investigation of the drivers of baseline changes in U.S. federal government technology programs. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):370–391.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt W, Raman A (2022) Operational disruptions, firm risk, and control systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):411–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Serpa JC, Krishnan H (2018) The impact of supply chains on firm-level productivity. Management Sci. 64(2):511–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Milkman KL, Fox CR (2012) The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vartabedian R (2021) Years of delays, billions in overruns: The dismal history of big infrastructure. New York Times (November 28), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/28/us/infrastructure-megaprojects.html.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li J, Wu D, Anupindi R (2021) When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical analysis of subtier supply network structure on firm risk. Management Sci. 67(4):2029–2048.Link, Google Scholar
• Warren PL (2014) Contracting officer workload, incomplete contracting, and contractual terms. RAND J. Econom. 45(2):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar