Treatment Allocation with Strategic Agents
References
- (2023) Externally valid treatment choice. Preprint, submitted July 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05561.Google Scholar
- (2021) The strategic perceptron. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 6–25.Google Scholar
- (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Retention futility: Targeting high-risk customers might be ineffective. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):80–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems. Science 355(6324):483–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The econometrics of randomized experiments. Banerjee A, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 73–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Policy learning with observational data. Econometrica 89(1):133–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Using confidence bounds for exploitation-exploration trade-offs. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:397–422.Google Scholar
- (2018) Optimal design of experiments in the presence of interference. Rev. Econom. Statist. 100(5):844–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Multiple randomization designs. Preprint, submitted December 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13495.Google Scholar
- (2023) Scoring strategic agents. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01888.Google Scholar
- (1997) A theory of misgovernance. Quart. J. Econom. 112(4):1289–1332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) From predictive to prescriptive analytics. Management Sci. 66(3):1025–1044.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Inferring welfare maximizing treatment assignment under budget constraints. J. Econometrics 167(1):168–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Behavior revealed in mobile phone usage predicts credit repayment. World Bank Econom. Rev. 34(3):618–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Manipulation-proof machine learning. Preprint, submitted April 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.03865.Google Scholar
- (2020) The role of randomness and noise in strategic classification. Roth A, ed. First Sympos. Foundations Responsible Comput. (Dagstuhl Publishing, Germany), 9:1–9:20.Google Scholar
- (2022) Performative prediction in a stateful world. Camps-Valls G, Ruiz FJR, Valera I, eds. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 6045–6061.Google Scholar
- (2018) Incentivizing exploration by heterogeneous users. Bubeck S, Perchet V, Rigollet P, eds. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 798–818.Google Scholar
- (2020) Learning strategy-aware linear classifiers. Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 33 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 15265–15276.Google Scholar
- (1978) Randomization by group: A formal analysis. Amer. J. Epidemiology 108(2):100–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Stochastic linear optimization under bandit feedback. 21st Annual Conf. Learn. Theory, 355–366.Google Scholar
- (2018) Strategic classification from revealed preferences. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 55–70.Google Scholar
- (2021) Learning models with uniform performance via distributionally robust optimization. Ann. Statist. 49(3):1378–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Online convex optimization in the bandit setting: Gradient descent without a gradient. Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 385–394.Google Scholar
- (2022) Improving information from manipulable data. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 20(1):79–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Incentivizing exploration. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 5–22.Google Scholar
- (2023) Bayesian Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Implicit contracts, moral hazard, and unemployment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):301–307.Google Scholar
- (2021) Maximizing welfare with incentive-aware evaluation mechanisms. Bessiere C, ed. Proc. 29th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (Yokohama, Japan), 160–166.Google Scholar
- (2010) The path to personalized medicine. New England J. Medicine 363(4):301–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Strategic classification. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Innovations Theoretical Comput. Sci. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 111–122.Google Scholar
- (2022) Design and analysis of bipartite experiments under a linear exposure-response model. Proc. 23rd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Google Scholar
- (2005) Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica 73(3):669–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Asymptotics for statistical treatment rules. Econometrica 77(5):1683–1701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Toward causal inference with interference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(482):832–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Incentivizing exploration with selective data disclosure. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 647–648.Google Scholar
- (2021) How to learn when data reacts to your model: Performative gradient descent. Meila M, Zhang T, eds. Proc. 38th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 139 (PMLR, New York), 4641–4650.Google Scholar
- (2021) Minimax-optimal policy learning under unobserved confounding. Management Sci. 67(5):2870–2890.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Doubly robust distributionally robust off-policy evaluation and learning. Chaudhuri K, Jegelka S, Song L, Szepesvari C, Niu G, Sabato S, eds. Proc. 39th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 162 (PMLR, New York), 10598–10632.Google Scholar
- (2018) Who should be treated? Empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice. Econometrica 86(2):591–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) How do classifiers induce agents to invest effort strategically? ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 8(4):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Policy learning under biased sample selection. Preprint, submitted April 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11735.Google Scholar
- (2019) Constrained Bayesian optimization with noisy experiments. Bayesian Anal. 14(2):495–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Statistical inference and A/B testing for first-price pacing equilibria. Preprint, submitted June 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02276.Google Scholar
- (1969) Optimization by Vector Space Methods (Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2004) Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations. Econometrica 72(4):1221–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Choosing treatment policies under ambiguity. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):25–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Bayesian incentive-compatible bandit exploration. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 565–582.Google Scholar
- (2022) Bayesian exploration: Incentivizing exploration in Bayesian games. Oper. Res. 70(2):1105–1127.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Strategic classification is causal modeling in disguise. Daumé III H, Singh A, eds. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 6917–6926.Google Scholar
- (2021) Outside the echo chamber: Optimizing the performative risk. Meila M, Zhang T, eds. Proc. 38th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 7710–7720.Google Scholar
- (2021) Learning optimal distributionally robust individualized treatment rules. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(534):659–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Treatment effects in market equilibrium. Preprint, submitted January 11, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11647.Google Scholar
- (1982) Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal–agent problems. J. Math. Econom. 10(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Experimentation for homogenous policy change. Preprint, submitted January 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12318.Google Scholar
- (2020) Performative prediction. Daumé III H, Singh A, eds. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 7599–7609.Google Scholar
- (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):134–139.Google Scholar
- (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Average treatment effects in the presence of unknown interference. Ann. Statist. 49(2):673–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Distributionally robust batch contextual bandits. Management Sci. 69(10):5772–5793.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Pereira F, Burges CJ, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ, eds. Twenty-Sixth Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
- (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):434–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design. Fürnkranz J, Joachims T, eds. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Omnipress, Madison, WI), 1015–1022.Google Scholar
- (2002) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):460–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) On causal inference in the presence of interference. Statist. Methods Medical Res. 21(1):55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Graph cluster randomization: Network exposure to multiple universes. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 329–337.Google Scholar
- (2019) Selecting optimal subgroups for treatment using many covariates. Epidemiology 30(3):334–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Identification and estimation of spillover effects in randomized experiments. J. Econometrics 237(1):105237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Experimental design under network interference. Preprint, submitted July 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08421.Google Scholar
- (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press).Google Scholar
- (2022) Costly multidimensional screening. Preprint, submitted August 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00487.Google Scholar
- (2018) How do price promotions affect customer behavior on retailing platforms? Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Production Oper. Management 27(12):2343–2345.Crossref, Google Scholar

