Growing up Under Mao and Deng: On Politician Ideology and Corporate Policies

References

• Alwin DF, Krosnick JA (1989) Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(3):416–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alwin DF, Krosnick JA (1991) Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(1):169–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Bennedsen M (2013) The value of local political connections in a low-corruption environment. J. Financial Econom. 110(2):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai CE, Hsieh CT, Song ZM (2020) Special deals with Chinese characteristics. NBER Macroeconom. Ann. 34(1):341–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Boycko M, Shleifer A, Tsukanova N (1996) How does privatization work? Evidence from the Russian shops. J. Political Econom. 104(4):764–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R (2008) Ideology. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(2–3):321–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Trebbi F (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bian Y, Shu X, Logan JR (2001) Communist party membership and regime dynamics in China. Social Forces 79(3):805–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bisetti E, Lewellen S, Sarkar A, Zhao X (2022) Smokestacks and the swamp. Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• Bortolotti B, Fotak V, Megginson W (2015) The sovereign wealth fund discount: Evidence from public equity investments. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(11):2993–3035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boubakri N, Cosset JC, Saffar W (2008) Political connections of newly privatized firms. J. Corporate Finance 14(5):654–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Pantzalis C, Yuan X (2016) The influence of political bias in state pension funds. J. Financial Econom. 119(1):69–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo M, Titiunik R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression‐discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6):2295–2326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantoni D, Chen Y, Yang DY, Yuchtman N, Zhang YJ (2017) Curriculum and ideology. J. Political Econom. 125(2):338–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Managers’ political beliefs and gender inequality among subordinates: Does his ideology matter more than hers? Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):287–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo M, Frandsen B, Titiunik R (2015) Randomization inference in the regression discontinuity design: An application to party advantages in the US Senate. J. Causal Inference 3(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo MD, Jansson M, Ma X (2020) Simple local polynomial density estimators. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(531):1449–1455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang MH (1996) The thought of Deng Xiaoping. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 29(4):377–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Kung JK (2020) The rise of communism in China. Working paper, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• Chin M, Hambrick DC, Trevino LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cingano F, Pinotti P (2013) Politicians at work: The private returns and social costs of political connections. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(2):433–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Fazzini A, Malloy C (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Political Econom. 116(5):951–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Fazzini A, Malloy C (2010) Sell side school ties. J. Finance 65(4):1409–1437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuervo A, Villalonga B (2000) Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization. Acad. Management Rev. 25(3):581–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng X, Kang J, Low B (2013) Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. J. Financial Econom. 110(1):87–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di H (1994) The most respected enemy: Mao Zedong’s perception of the United States. China Quart. 137(1):144–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L, Landes WM, Posner RA (2013) The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan JP, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J. Financial Econom. 84(2):330–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan G, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhu H (2003) Marketization index for China’s provinces. Econom. Res. J. 3(9):18.Google Scholar
• Ferracuti E, Michaely R, Wellman L (2025) Political activism and market power. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 60(6):2879–2920.Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Guriev S, Ioramashvili C, Plekhanov A (2024) Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from around the world. Econom. J. 134(660):1494–1516.Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Shi J, Wang Y, Wu W (2020) Social ties and the selection of China’s political elite. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(6):1752–1781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Briscoe F, Hambrick DC (2017) Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1018–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallward-Driemeier M, Pritchett L (2015) How business is done in the developing world: Deals versus rules. J. Econom. Perspectives 29(3):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassan T, Hollander S, van Lent L, Tahoun A (2019) Firm-level political risk: Measurement and effects. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2135–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Tian X, Yang H, Zuo L (2020) Asymmetric cost behavior and dividend policy. J. Accounting Res. 58(4):989–1021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RM, Nixon DC (2002) Regional court influence over bureaucratic policymaking: Courts, ideological preferences, and the internal revenue service. Political Res. Quart. 55(4):907–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y (2022) Government subsidies and corporate disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 74(1):101480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang A, Hui KW, Li RZ (2019) Federal judge ideology: A new measure of ex ante litigation risk. J. Accounting Res. 57(2):431–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby WG (2014) Is there a culture war? Conflicting value structures in American public opinion. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 108(4):754–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia R (2017) Pollution for promotion. Preprint, submitted December 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3029046.Google Scholar
• Jia R, Kudamatsu M, Seim D (2015) Political selection in China: The complementary roles of connections and performance. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(4):631–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang W (2017) Have instrumental variables brought us closer to the truth. Rev. Corporate Financial Stud. 6(2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Julio B, Yook Y (2012) Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. J. Finance 67(1):45–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrain J (1979) The Concept of Ideology (Hutchinson, London).Google Scholar
• Laudenbach C, Malmendier U, Niessen-Ruenzi A (2018) The long-lasting effects of experiencing communism on financial risk-taking. Working paper, Goethe University, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
• Li B, Walder AG (2001) Career advancement as party patronage: Sponsored mobility into the Chinese administrative elite, 1949–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1371–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lotta R (1994) Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook (Banner Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Malmendier U (2018) Behavioral corporate finance. NBER Working Paper No. 25162, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Nagel S, Yan Z (2021) The making of Hawks and Doves: Inflation experiences on the FOMC. J. Monetary Econom. 117(1):19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannheim K (1929) Ideologie Und Utopie (Cohen, Bonn, Germany).Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qiao K (2020) Waking from Mao’s dream: Communist ideological imprinting and the internationalization of entrepreneurial ventures in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):795–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econom. 142(2):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller HM, Ouimet PP, Simintzi E (2017) Wage inequality and firm growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):379–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Washington E (2009) Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(1):86–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naughton B (1993) Deng Xiaoping: The economist. China Quart. 124(1):491–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naughton B (1996) Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978-1993 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Neretina E (2019) Lobbying externalities and competition. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
• Patil SV (2018) The public doesn’t understand: The self-reinforcing interplay of image discrepancies and political ideologies in law enforcement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):737–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piketty T (2020) Capital and Ideology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 1–27.Google Scholar
• Piketty T, Yang L, Zucman G (2019) Capital accumulation, private property, and rising inequality in China, 1978–2015. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(7):2469–2496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potrafke N (2018) Government ideology and economic policy-making in the United States—A survey. Public Choice 74(1–2):145–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raynard M, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (2013) Legacies of logics: Sources of community variation in CSR implementation in China. Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E, eds. Institutional Logics in Action, Part A (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 243–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ru H, Zou K (2022) How do individual politicians affect privatization? Evidence from China. Rev. Finance 26(3):637–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenherr D (2019) Political connections and allocative distortions. J. Finance 74(2):543–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen N (2013) Maoism and the Buddhist Philosophy of India and China (Creative Publication, Kolkata).Google Scholar
• Shambaugh DL, Brinley JJ (2008) China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staudt N, Epstein L, Wiedenbeck P (2006) The ideological component of judging in the taxation context. Washington University Law Rev. 84(1):1797.Google Scholar
• Thompson JB (1984) Studies in the Theory of Ideology (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh KC (2012) Putting inequality in its place: Rural consciousness and the power of perspective. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 106(3):517–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Du F, Marquis C (2019) Defending Mao’s dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1111–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young LC (1973) Mao Tse-Tung and social inequality. Sociol. Focus 6(4):46–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zingales L (2017) Towards a political theory of the firm. J. Econom. Perspectives 31(3):113–130.Crossref, Google Scholar