Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century

References

• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(6):1488–1542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2022) Power and Prediction: The Disruptive Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Atack J, Margo RA, Rhode PW (2019) ‘Automation’ of manufacturing in the late nineteenth century: The hand and machine labor study. J. Econom. Perspective 33(2):51–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AT&T (1917) Standard Occupational Classification of Telephone Employees: Bell Telephone System (Baker Library, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• AT&T (1937) First Dial Cutover and Per Cent Dial Stations of Total Stations (as of 12-31-37) in Cities of 50,000 Population or Over (AT&T Archives and History Center, Warren, NJ).Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspective 29(3):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY (2018) Bottlenecks, modules and dynamic architectural capabilities. Teece DJ, Heaton S, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Dynamic Capabilities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basker E (2012) Raising the barcode scanner: Technology and productivity in the retail sector. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(3):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basker E, Simcoe T (2021) Upstream, downstream: Diffusion and impacts of the universal product code. J. Political Econom. 129(4):1252–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen JE (2015) Learning by Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2014) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Management Sci. 60(12):2859–2885.Link, Google Scholar
• Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Rev. Econom. Stud., ePub ahead of print February 6, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae007.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF (2021) Artificial intelligence technologies and aggregate growth prospects. Diamond JW, Zodrow GR, eds. Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 132–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies: ‘Engines of growth’? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Jin W, McElheran K (2021a) The power of prediction: Predictive analytics, workplace complements, and business performance. Bus. Econom. 56:217–239.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2021b) The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 13(1):333–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapuis R (1982) 100 Years of Telephone Switching (North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Cohen LE (2013) Assembling jobs: A model of how tasks are bundled into and across jobs. Organ. Sci. 24(2):432–454.Link, Google Scholar
• David PA (1990) The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):355–361.Google Scholar
• Erickson E (1947) Typical Women’s Jobs in the Telephone Industry (Department of Labor Women’s Bureau, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum JJ, Gross DP (2022) Answering the call of automation: How the labor market adjusted to the mechanization of telephone operation. NBER Working Paper No. 28061, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Freeman WG (1937) History of the Development of the Panel Machine Switching System (AT&T Archives and History Center, Warren, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gherardi B (1917) Memorandum for J J. Carty, Chief Engineer (AT&T Archives and History Center, Warren, NJ).Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Ferguson J-P, Koning R (2015) The lives and deaths of jobs: Technical interdependence and survival in a job structure. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1665–1681.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juhász R, Squicciarini MP, Ander NV (2020) Technology adoption and productivity growth: Evidence from industrialization in France. NBER Working Paper No. 27503, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Karim S, Lee CH, Hoehn-Weiss MN (2023) Task bottlenecks and resource bottlenecks. Strategic Management J. 44(8):1839–1878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN (2002) Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 49(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Lipartito K (1994a) Component innovation: The case of automatic telephone switching, 1891–1920. Industrial Corporate Change 3(2):325–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipartito K (1994b) When women were switches: Technology, work, and gender in the telephone industry, 1890–1920. Amer. History Rev. 99(4):1075–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher J, Miller NH, Osborne M (2021) Finding Mr. Schumpeter: Technology adoption in the cement industry. RAND J. Econom. 52:1101–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller M (1997) Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• National Labor Relations Board (NRLB) (1944) Board Decision. 55 N.L.R.B. 1058.Google Scholar
• Orbach WM (1930) Memorandum for W J. O’Connor, Assistant to the President (AT&T Archives and History Center, Warren, NJ).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M (2013) Interdependence and organization design. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 193–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Ruggles S, Flood S, Goeken R, Grover J, Meyer E, Pacas J, Sobek M (2019) IPUMS USA: Version 9.0 [data set] (IPUMS, Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(suppl. 2):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Sullivan R (1940) Testimony to the temporary National Economic Committee. Hearings Before the Tempoeary National Economic Committee, Seventy-Sixth Congress, Third Session, Part 30, No. 1: Technology and Concentration of Economic Power (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), 16669–16688.Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Turner WO (1958) Memorandum for File: History of the Bell System Telephone Numbering Plan (April 28) (AT&T Archives and History Center, Warren, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (1964) Impact of office automation in the internal revenue service: A study of the manpower implications during the first stages of the changeover. Bulletin No. 1364, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar