An Experiment on Gender Representation in Majoritarian Bargaining

References

• Andersen S, Ertac S, Gneezy U, List JA, Maximiano S (2018) On the cultural basis of gender differences in negotiation. Experiment. Econom. 21(4):757–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58(1):78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2009) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Baranski A, Morton R (2022) The determinants of multilateral bargaining: A comprehensive analysis of Baron and Ferejohn majoritarian bargaining experiments. Experiment. Econom. 25(4):1079–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Ferejohn JA (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 83(4):1181–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilén D, Dreber A, Johannesson M (2021) Are women more generous than men? A meta-analysis. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 7(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Brosig-Koch JE (2012) How do coalitions get built? Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with and without communication. Internat. J. Game Theory 41(3):623–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Chatterjee K, McGinn KL (2003) How communication links influence coalition bargaining: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 49(5):583–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Born A, Ranehill E, Sandberg A (2022) Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(2):259–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourreau-Dubois C, Doriat-Duban M, Jeandidier B, Ray J-C (2020) Does gender diversity in panels of judges matter? Evidence from French child support cases. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 63:105929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd CL, Epstein L, Martin AD (2010) Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. Amer. J. Political Sci. 54(2):389–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Nave G, Smith A (2019) Dynamic unstructured bargaining with private information: Theory, experiment, and outcome prediction via machine learning. Management Sci. 65(4):1867–1890.Link, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Gangadharan L, Grossman PJ (2022) Gender, beliefs, and coordination with externalities. J. Public Econom. 214:104744.Google Scholar
• Castillo M, Petrie R, Torero M, Vesterlund L (2013) Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination. J. Public Econom. 99:35–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2016) A failure to communicate: An experimental investigation of the effects of advice on strategic play. Eur. Econom. Rev. 82:24–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, De Oliveira AC, Grossman PJ (2008) Gender and negotiation in the small: Are women (perceived to be) more cooperative than men? Negotiation J. 24(4):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econom. Inquiry 39(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Roberto MA, Watkins MD (2003) A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quart. 14(3):297–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel C (2011) Dictator games: A meta study. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):583–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eraslan H, Evdokimov KS (2019) Legislative and multilateral bargaining. Annual Rev. Econom. 11(1):443–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson KH, Sandberg A (2012) Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter? Negotiation J. 28(4):407–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2020) Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning in. J. Political Econom. 128(3):816–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geraldes D (2020) Women dislike competing against men. Working paper no. 3741649.Google Scholar
• Gillen BSE, Yariv L (2019) Experiments with measurement error: Techniques with applications to the Caltech cohort study. J. Political Econom. 127:1826–1863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J (2000) Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):973–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Arenaz I, Iriberri N (2018) Women ask for less (only from men): Evidence from bargaining in the field. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 152:192–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Arenaz I, Iriberri N (2023) Gender differences in alternating-offer bargaining: An experimental study. Experiment. Econom. 26:879–914.Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Huang J, Krivkovich A, Starikova I, Yee L, Zanoschi D (2019) Women in the workplace. McKinsey & Co. Accessed December 13, 2020, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/women-in-the-workplace-2019.Google Scholar
• Inter-Parliamentary Union (2020) 25 years after Beijing, IPU analysis shows that gender parity is possible [press release]. Accessed December 5, 2020, https://www.ipu.org/news/press-releases/2020-03/25-years-after-beijing-ipu-analysis-shows-gender-parity-possible.Google Scholar
• Kamm A, Siegenthaler S (2022) Commitment timing in coalitional bargaining. Experiment. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laroze D, Hugh-Jones D, Leininger A (2020) The impact of group identity on coalition formation. Res. Politics 7(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020967488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Sci. 61(9):2016–2024.Link, Google Scholar
• Menz M (2012) Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Management 38(1):45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithani MA, O’Brien JP (2021) So what exactly is a “coalition” within an organization? A review and organizing framework. J. Management 47(1):171–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, Van De Kuilen G (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experiment. Econom. 7(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palfrey TR (2016) Experiments in political economy. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 347–434.Google Scholar
• Recalde M, Vesterlund L (2020) Gender differences in negotiation and policy for improvement. NBER working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1995) Introduction to experimental economics. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(5):1068–1095.Google Scholar
• Sandberg S (2013) Lean in: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead (Alfred A. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Säve-Söderbergh J (2019) Gender gaps in salary negotiations: Salary requests and starting salaries in the field. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 161:35–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan X (2020) Does minority status drive women out of male-dominated fields? Accessed December 15, 2020, https://sites.google.com/view/xiaoyueshan/research.Google Scholar
• Solnick SJ (2001) Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Econom. Inquiry 39(2):189–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoddard O, Karpowitz C, Preece J (2020) Strength in numbers: A field experiment in gender, influence, and group dynamics. IZA discussion paper.Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Bosman R, Kocher MG, van Winden F (2009) Gender pairing and bargaining-beware the same sex! Experiment. Econom. 12(3):318–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremewan J, Vanberg C (2020) Voting rules in multilateral bargaining: Using an experiment to relax procedural assumptions. Working paper, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
• Van Veldhuizen R (2022) Gender differences in tournament choices: Risk preferences, overconfidence, or competitiveness? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 20:1595–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wesemann E, Kerr NJ (2020) 2015 global partner compensation survey. Edge International. Accessed December 5, 2022, http://www.edge.ai/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Edge-Compensation-Survey_20150302.pdf.Google Scholar