Noise Trading and Asset Pricing Factors
References
- (2018) Why do mutual funds hold lottery stocks? Preprint, submitted April 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3164692.Google Scholar
- (2020) Do mutual fund investors overweight the probability of extreme payoffs in the return distribution? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55:223–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Smart money, dumb money, and capital market anomalies. J. Financial Econom. 118:355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Predictive regressions: A reduced-bias estimation method. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 39:813–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) An anatomy of long-short equity funds. Preprint, submitted February 26, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813790.Google Scholar
- (2014) Connected stocks. J. Finance 69:1099–1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Factor momentum. Preprint, submitted March 22, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116974.Google Scholar
- (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Finance 61:1645–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Which factors matter to investors? Evidence from mutual fund flows. Rev. Financial Stud. 29:2600–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Style investing. J. Financial Econom. 68:161–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022a) Ratings-driven demand and systematic price fluctuations. Rev. Financial Stud. 35:2790–2838.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022b) What do mutual fund investors really care about? Rev. Financial Stud. 35:1723–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Assessing asset pricing models using revealed preference. J. Financial Econom. 119:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) When anomalies are publicized broadly, do institutions trade accordingly? Management Sci. 65:4555–4574.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Arbitrage trading: The long and the short of it. Rev. Financial Stud. 32:1608–1646.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Cho T (2018) Heat as a sedative: A natural experiment on noise trading and aggregate stock market reversals. Working paper, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
- (2020) The causal effect of limits to arbitrage on asset pricing anomalies. J. Finance 75:2631–2672.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A simple way to estimate bid-ask spreads from daily high and low prices. J. Finance 67:719–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Asset fire sales (and purchases) in equity markets. J. Financial Econom. 86:479–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Polit. Econom. 98:703–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal vs. naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Stud. 22:1915–1953.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Institutional investors and stock return anomalies. J. Financial Econom. 119:472–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Taming the factor zoo: A test of new factors. J. Finance 75:1327–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Dumb money: Mutual fund flows and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 88:299–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Style investing and institutional investors. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 43:883–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) In search of the origins of financial fluctuations: The inelastic markets hypothesis. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2017) Institutional ownership and return predictability across economically unrelated stocks. J. Financial Intermediation 31:45–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Institutional investors and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116:229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Stock price fragility. J. Financial Econom. 102:471–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. J. Bus. 62:393–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Limits of arbitrage: The state of the theory. Annu. Rev. Financial Econom. 2:251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The dynamics of financially constrained arbitrage. J. Finance 73:1713–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Choice of sample split in out-of-sample forecast evaluation. Preprint, submitted February 7, https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/aahcreate/2012-43.htm.Google Scholar
- (2014) The growth and limits of arbitrage: Evidence from short interest. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:1238–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Presidential address: The scientific outlook in financial economics. J. Finance 72:1399–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) …And the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 29:5–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Investor psychology and asset pricing. J. Finance 56:1533–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Replicating anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. 33:2019–2133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Huang S, Liu X, Lou D, Polk C (2024) The booms and busts of beta arbitrage. Management Sci. 70(8):5367–5385.Google Scholar
- (2019) How do factor premia vary over time? A century of evidence. Preprint, submitted June 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3400998.Google Scholar
- (2000) Truth in mutual fund advertising: Evidence on future performance and fund flows. J. Finance 55:937–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48:65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) WSJ Category Kings—The impact of media attention on consumer and mutual fund investment decisions. J. Financial Econom. 123:337–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return. J. Financial Econom. 134:501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) A demand system approach to asset pricing. J. Polit. Econom. 127:1475–1515.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Interpreting factor models. J. Finance 73:1183–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Shrinking the cross-section. J. Financial Econom. 135:271–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. J. Finance 46:75–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Institutional investors and the limits of arbitrage. J. Financial Econom. 102:62–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) What drives the size and value factors? Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 12:845–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The history of the cross-section of stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31:2606–2649.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A flow-based explanation for return predictability. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:3457–3489.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Comomentum: Inferring arbitrage activity from return correlations. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(7):3272–3302.Google Scholar
- (2007) Asymptotics for out of sample tests of Granger causality. J. Econometrics 140:719–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J. Finance 71:5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Investing in equity mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 63:351–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Factor rebalancing. Preprint, submitted March 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3327849.Google Scholar
- (2010) Average correlation and stock market returns. J. Financial Econom. 96:364–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Winners in the spotlight: Media coverage of fund holdings as a driver of flows. J. Financial Econom. 113:53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The mismatch between mutual fund scale and skill. J. Finance 75(5):2555–2589.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Predictive regressions. J. Financial Econom. 54:375–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The short of it: Investor sentiment and anomalies. J. Financial Econom. 104:288–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Style effects in the cross-section of stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 74:367–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev. Financial Stud. 21:1455–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar

